Time to face fact

[George Cumby]

I think we can try to put this thread back on topic. If we can remember what it was.

Fact to be faced:

Packers are 3-3 with the toughest part of the schedule behind them.

[pbmax]

Excellent. I have a question. One of ND's complaints was about the O line. They did a reasonable job versus a good front seven in Houston esp. with pass protection. Rodgers was sacked twice and he ran into JJ Watt's second sack. I watched Saturday and Newhouse mainly. While Newhouse occasionally got a little loose with his set and hands on his DE, Saturday seemed solid and Rodgers called out the protection only on a few occasions at it was their best game outside of the New Orleans game.

Did anyone see this differently? And how did Bulaga look?

[Joemailman]

Fact: Packers were 3-3 after 6 games in 2010.

Pact: Packers have faced 4 of the top 6 ranked defenses in the NFL so far.

Fact: Their next opponent is #7.

[denverYooper]

Fact to be faced:

Packers are 3-3 with the toughest part of the schedule behind them.

I think the Rams game will still be pretty tough. Hope they don't take that one off.

[pbmax]

Fact: Packers were 3-3 after 6 games in 2010.

Pact: Packers have faced 4 of the top 6 ranked defenses in the NFL so far.

Fact: Their next opponent is #7.

7th opponent AND seventh ranked D? Might need some voodoo for this road game.

[MadtownPacker]

Dont worry I got a chicken that will be choked 7 times before the Sunday. This will please the football Gods...

[MadtownPacker]

Sometimes, your wrongness is stunning even to me after all these years.

I was reacting to multiple requests to remove the post. If it were anywhere but in the Packer room it would have stayed. I wasn't permanently deleted in case someone decided I over-reacted. Also, I don't think I would ever do something to teach you a lesson. That would indicate you have the ability to learn about consequences for actions. I don't give you that much credit.

Dammit!! I shoulda known this would happen when I brought in moderators from the Lingerie forum!!

[Harlan Huckleby]

Youtube and Packerrats can essentially do what they want, and it's tough titties for you and everyone else..

Same strawman argument. I never disputed that websites can do what they want. Youtube chooses to set policies that balance decency standards with free speech, and they follow those standards.

Somehow, I suspect you will survive the injustice you've been dealt. You want to post snuff videos with impunity? Start your own website.

I did not post a snuff video. I post a .gif of the kennedy assasination, the Zapruder frames that have been seen by all hundreds of times. The purpose was as a prop for a joke related to the football topic. Nothing I did was against the policies of this website, AFAIK.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Harlan.

Fuck it.

What is this, the 5000th iteration of this shit?

Yes, same old stump speech. Yet ....... still no answers.

Maybe Officer Zool thought he was acting within the guidelines of this website. Maybe the guideline is that any image in the Packer section that causes anyone to complain should be removed. Well, if that is the rule, then the issue really is not recreational censorship. The problem is some reflexively tight sphincter muscles among the townfolk.

Why do people demand that an image be removed? To protect the children? To prevent outbreak of "snuff films"? I would say they want to validate their feelings, get officially sanction that they are OK and the other person is not.

[Joemailman]

Yes, same old stump speech. Yet ....... still no answers.

Enough. Take this conversation to the RR.

[Harlan Huckleby]

"Values" is another term for a moral code shared by a group of people. Given the response to the .gif in question, I think that the group has spoken. And what the group has said is that that particular video crossed the boundary of what is acceptable here. i.e.: A violation of the shared moral code.

Perhaps so. It could be that the group is rather intolerant, identical to the Muslims demanding censorship because they were offended.

[sharpe1027]

I would say HH wants to validate his feelings, get officially sanction that he is OK and the other person is not.

Fixed.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Enough. Take this conversation to the RR.

Don't blame me - I'm just responding to people who won't let it go.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Fixed.

Hardly. I am not expecting any sanction or validation. I'm just standing up for principle.

[MadtownPacker]

It could be that the group is rather intolerant

A bunch of Whiteys from WI? I cant imagine it!

There is a thread in the RR waiting for all your wonderful replies. Join us...