Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Your 2012 Packers Offense

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Your 2012 Packers Offense

    Is most likely going to look very different from last year's by the end of the year for many reasons:

    The bad
    1.) Jennings has been hurt. The number of commercials he is in these days makes me think that he is starting to focus on life after football. He's cashing in while he can.
    2.) Finley has been hurt and can't seem to get out of his own head. I think his receiving has actually regressed even more. He's often double clutching, which is really disconcerting.
    3.) Jordy goes missing for large portions of games. I don't really know why. Are teams focusing on taking him away because of his deep plays last year?
    4.) Benson is hurt. They were gravitating toward a Benson-led balanced attack that seemed to show promise for all of 8 quarters (2nd half SEA, NO, 1st half IND) but then went back into passwackiland when he went down.
    5.) The staff has been reshuffled
    6.) Saturday "is what he is". He's new and his game these days is his smarts and knowledge of the offense. He just may not have the line calls down pat yet. When it comes down to it, I don't think he's losing them games but given everything else, a new C is one more weakness.
    7.) Bulaga is injured or something. He's regressed but I suspect it is due to something that we do not know about. Anyway, he's just not the same.
    8.) Rodgers is in a bit of a shell at the moment. Too many changes for him to be comfortable? Maybe he needs a lot of structure in place to be comfortable.

    The good:
    1.) Randall Cobb looks like he could be an elite player. Why are they not trying to get him the ball more? I've mentioned before that he is the one guy who is making plays for them when they get stuck but most of the time he's being forgotten. PFF had Rodgers rating when throwing at Cobb a 158.3.
    2.) James Jones is playing like a pretty good power forward. He's mixing it up, boxing guys out. and catching most of the more impressive TDs that Rodgers has thrown. If he could only learn to make a play on an INT intended for him, he'd be a fairly complete physical receiver.
    3.) DJ Williams has shown some reliability and the best hands of the TE group.
    4.) Lang and Sitton at times look like the best guard tandem in the entire league. Lang gets beat occasionally on tricks but they usually don't work on him more than once and the man will straight up beat the snot out of dudes across from him with an impressive fire. Sitton is quietly having a very good year again. Their work downfield last game was shocking. In a way it's too bad that Saturday is not a more physical guy because that GCG unit could just be destroying teams on their own if so.

    The unknown:
    1.) What will come of the running game now? Maybe the Stark Plug will come back and relight the fire a la 2010.
    2.) What of Quarless and/or Sherrod? They are largely unknown right now but Quarless could be another player to come around and spark the offense. Maybe because he has so much time in the offense (an important consideration with this staff), they'll trust him to come in and play as soon as they feel his conditioning is up.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

  • #2
    One other thing about Lang. He's become somewhat of a vocal leader on that offense. I'd bet that the team doesn't appreciate his outbursts about refs and the Packers pass wackiness but maybe they need that voice right now. The guy who is pissed off in love with his team and who is all football right now. The guy who speaks for the Packerrats .
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by denverYooper View Post
      One other thing about Lang. He's become somewhat of a vocal leader on that offense. I'd bet that the team doesn't appreciate his outbursts about refs and the Packers pass wackiness but maybe they need that voice right now. The guy who is pissed off in love with his team and who is all football right now. The guy who speaks for the Packerrats .
      I mean, it's kind of a refreshing change to hear him say what everyone is complaining about: teams are going after Rodgers hard because they keep trying to drop back to pass. Instead of the bland statements of "we thought we had some matchups on the outside that we could take advantage of."
      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think the offense is lackluster because of the "wanting to get an explosive play" MM refers to this often, but I really disagree with him. Maybe a couple times a game you take a shot, but it seems that our passing offense had evolved into 15 yard routes. With teams playing SS over the top, most DB are sitting on the 10-15 yard route. What is so wrong with taking the check-down....that is what the defense is giving us! You would hope with the "talent" that everyone says our WR/TE's have, they would be able to get 3-5 yards on every play!

        By doing this, it helps in two(2) areas:

        1) More of a systematic approach, long drives keeping the opponents defense on the field. They longer they are on the field, the more likely a mistake will be made and then you will get your "explosive play" that you are looking for. The defense will creep closer to the line, leaving single SS or nothing over the top.

        2) Keep our defense on the sidelines. We all know a rested defense is a better defense....what did the Colts run, 20 more plays than us?
        If you don't like me....bite me...
        ....want some, come get some!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by denverYooper View Post
          8.) Rodgers is in a bit of a shell at the moment. Too many changes for him to be comfortable? Maybe he needs a lot of structure in place to be comfortable..
          He needs a structure alright - a pocket. Newhouse and Bulaga slow-down the speed rushers, but now Rodgers can't step up after 3 Mississippis. I blame Saturday because I saw two or three bad plays, for whatever that is worth.

          Comment


          • #6
            The biggest question for me has been where the heck has Jordy been.

            All the reports out of TC were that he was rolling and was ready to build on last year. Are teams taking him away deep?
            Go PACK

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
              He needs a structure alright - a pocket. Newhouse and Bulaga slow-down the speed rushers, but now Rodgers can't step up after 3 Mississippis. I blame Saturday because I saw two or three bad plays, for whatever that is worth.
              It can't be Saturday, when I said Wells would be missed all the "experts" on here said no way.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                It can't be Saturday, when I said Wells would be missed all the "experts" on here said no way.
                You've reached your quota for "I told you so" for the month. Shouldn't you be a GM somewhere with all your insight?
                Originally posted by 3irty1
                This is museum quality stupidity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                  It can't be Saturday, when I said Wells would be missed all the "experts" on here said no way.
                  I think you are grossly mischaracterizing what was said. I don't recall anyone who wouldn't have liked to have Wells back. The problem was the cost of the contract he wanted and got. Even after losing Wells, they may not have enough room to retain Jennings. That's what happens with a salary cap.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                    It can't be Saturday, when I said Wells would be missed all the "experts" on here said no way.
                    Of course, the Cardinals have been missing Wells too.
                    I can't run no more
                    With that lawless crowd
                    While the killers in high places
                    Say their prayers out loud
                    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                    A thundercloud
                    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                      Of course, the Cardinals have been missing Wells too.
                      Wells signed with the Rams.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
                        Wells signed with the Rams.
                        Oops! Well, the Cardinals used to be in St. Louis.
                        I can't run no more
                        With that lawless crowd
                        While the killers in high places
                        Say their prayers out loud
                        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                        A thundercloud
                        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Rutnstrut View Post
                          It can't be Saturday, when I said Wells would be missed all the "experts" on here said no way.
                          Peeps come on here to have an opinion on football, I dont recall anyone calling themselves an "expert". Except maybe Harlan and Nutty. Those pricks.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                            Oops! Well, the Cardinals used to be in St. Louis.
                            Forgetting the plays? Time to retire your number?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Ballboy View Post
                              I think the offense is lackluster because of the "wanting to get an explosive play" MM refers to this often, but I really disagree with him. Maybe a couple times a game you take a shot, but it seems that our passing offense had evolved into 15 yard routes. With teams playing SS over the top, most DB are sitting on the 10-15 yard route. What is so wrong with taking the check-down....that is what the defense is giving us! You would hope with the "talent" that everyone says our WR/TE's have, they would be able to get 3-5 yards on every play!

                              By doing this, it helps in two(2) areas:

                              1) More of a systematic approach, long drives keeping the opponents defense on the field. They longer they are on the field, the more likely a mistake will be made and then you will get your "explosive play" that you are looking for. The defense will creep closer to the line, leaving single SS or nothing over the top.

                              2) Keep our defense on the sidelines. We all know a rested defense is a better defense....what did the Colts run, 20 more plays than us?
                              I am frustrated by all the missed connections on the deep throws, but lets be honest here. Very few plays or situations have every receiver going long. Rodger repeatedly overlooked shorter throws this season and did it again twice in Indy. He has to get in sync with what's available as well.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X