Originally posted by mraynrand
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jermichael Decorean Finley, PhD, Chemistry, University of Texas - Green Bay
Collapse
X
-
They can probably trade him for a late round pick if his contract isn't a big issue. Finley has a base salary next year of 4.45 million. He also has a misc. bonus (roster bonus?) of 3.8 million. If a team trades for Finley, do they have to pay the bonus? Teams might be willing to trade for Finley if the price tag is 4.45 million. Not so sure about 8.25 million.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
-
Originally posted by Joemailman View PostThey can probably trade him for a late round pick if his contract isn't a big issue. Finley has a base salary next year of 4.45 million. He also has a misc. bonus (roster bonus?) of 3.8 million. If a team trades for Finley, do they have to pay the bonus? Teams might be willing to trade for Finley if the price tag is 4.45 million. Not so sure about 8.25 million.
I am fairly sure if they trade him by March the new team would pay the bonus
They won't trade Finley unless they can give his current agent time to work out a deal with a new team.
This would be a hard bluff to make. They won't get much more than a lower draft pick for elite type talent because in the end most GM's will know he's getting cut anyways.
In the old days this would have Al Davis writtern all over it.........................Jerry Jones, anyone ?TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Sounds like a leak meant to start a fire right before they wish to get hot.
Benching Colledge worked, not sure how Finley will respond to this. Its a lot more public but easier to deny.
Bob has one possible outcome nailed down here, but the phrase "barring a shocking turn of events in the next month or so" could mean a lot of different things. I do agree this is a decision they usually wait to make as they already budgeted for him. It will make a hash of the KGB and AJ Hawk examples.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
That's a good question. Would they hold the new team's feet to the fire? If they don't, he gets $7 million almost certainly, though not protected for injury. Would the market support giving him another $7 million in a new bonus for an extension?Originally posted by Bretsky View PostI am fairly sure if they trade him by March the new team would pay the bonus
They won't trade Finley unless they can give his current agent time to work out a deal with a new team.
This would be a hard bluff to make. They won't get much more than a lower draft pick for elite type talent because in the end most GM's will know he's getting cut anyways.
In the old days this would have Al Davis writtern all over it.........................Jerry Jones, anyone ?Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
I'm not sure the Vikings would have much interest. The already have two young, high 2nd round TEs in Kyle Rudolph and John Carlson. Rudolph has been said to be Ponder's favorite target, and has been at least OK. Carlson was pretty productive in Seattle before coming to MN for $25 million.Originally posted by mraynrand View PostI hope the Packers can trade him, because the two most likely landing spots are Chicago and Minnesota.
Comment
-
This presupposes rational Viking front office decisions.Originally posted by Patler View PostI'm not sure the Vikings would have much interest. The already have two young, high 2nd round TEs in Kyle Rudolph and John Carlson. Rudolph has been said to be Ponder's favorite target, and has been at least OK. Carlson was pretty productive in Seattle before coming to MN for $25 million.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
$8.750 million cap hit in 2013. Ouch. That will need to be renegotiated.
Packers probably absorb $500,000 of that. But its still a hefty number.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
I dont see why you sissy girls would be worried about him going to the bears or vikings. He doesnt fit either offense really. They have strong run games and we know finley aint trying to break a nail out there. Plus vikings wont want a nutjob fucking with there shaky, young QB's confidence. Finley cries about Rodgers? You seen how cutler acts with his teammates, he isnt considerate enough to use the kid gloves Rodgers has used with Finley all these years. The reality is the only NFCN team finely fits on is the lions. Dysfunctional would feel right at home for him.
Comment
-
If we move Finley who will be our starter? Quarless? We have no clue if he'll ever be the player he once was. Williams? Taylor? Crabby? How come none of these guys have been able to unseat Finley as our starter who most here have no use for? I say until we find someone better either in the offseason either in FA or the draft Finley isn't going anywhere.
Comment
-
Don't we have several clues that finley will never be the player he once was?Originally posted by Pugger View PostIf we move Finley who will be our starter? Quarless? We have no clue if he'll ever be the player he once was. Williams? Taylor? Crabby? How come none of these guys have been able to unseat Finley as our starter who most here have no use for? I say until we find someone better either in the offseason either in FA or the draft Finley isn't going anywhere.
Comment
-
maybe because we kept playing him based on potential?Originally posted by Pugger View PostIf we move Finley who will be our starter? Quarless? We have no clue if he'll ever be the player he once was. Williams? Taylor? Crabby? How come none of these guys have been able to unseat Finley as our starter who most here have no use for? I say until we find someone better either in the offseason either in FA or the draft Finley isn't going anywhere.
i'm honestly more comfortable right now with crabtree then i am finley. crab isn't a world beater, but he can block AND make a catch when needed
Comment
-
Yes, Crabby is a good blocker - much better than Finley - but I've seen Crabtree drop a few passes too. If he was better than Finley he'd be the starter. I hope we find somebody better than any of the TEs we presently have on the roster in 2013.Originally posted by red View Postmaybe because we kept playing him based on potential?
i'm honestly more comfortable right now with crabtree then i am finley. crab isn't a world beater, but he can block AND make a catch when needed
Comment
-
we have a ton of good WR's, even if jennings leaves. we don't need an all world TE, just a reliable one imoOriginally posted by Pugger View PostYes, Crabby is a good blocker - much better than Finley - but I've seen Crabtree drop a few passes too. If he was better than Finley he'd be the starter. I hope we find somebody better than any of the TEs we presently have on the roster in 2013.
Comment

Comment