Tweet
Originally posted by Fosco33
View Post
-
Yep, I about peed myself on the first one. This one, I chuckled a couple times. -
-
Thats why I was wondering if it was the same dudes. The first one came off like a real shit talking session. This one was kinda forced but still funny.Originally posted by Fosco33 View PostComment
-
The first one was definitely funnier...but i did LOL over "The fuck you're not...DID YOU GET A DOG?" hahahaComment
-
this one had me in tears.
Comment
-
THought this one was better.Comment
-
First one was better but still funny.
Comment
-
I had a hard time finding anything that was genuinely funny in this one. As Mad said, it was a lot of forced attempts at funny, and the name calling sounds like a 11 year old hacked his Moms AOL and had fun.Originally posted by Fosco33 View Post
Kinda like this one was nothing more than a recap of the weeks games, whereas the first one took good deep shots at the QBs
Last edited by Jimx29; 10-17-2012, 07:32 PM.The Bottom Line:
Formally Numb, same person, same views of M3Comment
-
I think this one is less funny because it's no longer novel. In truth, it's probably done by the same guys looking to duplicate a hit. And they probably came close (although I think the topics aren't quite as funny as round one). But without novelty it was pretty much blah.No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.Comment
-
The first one was comedic gold. I truly don't remember the last time I laughed so hard. It was a masterful use of parodic knowledge of the subjects in question. It was a brilliant series of in-jokes that we, as football fans, were in on. This one was good for a couple of chuckles but the first bordered on genius.Comment
-
There were a couple of good lines in this one. "The fuck you're not. DID YOU GET A DOG?" made me laugh 'cause it's how I would've said it. "Slap-nuts" made me laugh for some reason
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...Comment
Comment