Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PackerStats -- Green Bay at Halfway

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PackerStats -- Green Bay at Halfway

    Your 2012 Green Bay Packers halfway stat snapshot, with 2011 final numbers for reference. There are a ton more things that *could* be added, but the things on here were the numbers that have often been bandied about in describing performance for this team. If you have suggested metrics, please post or suggest them.



    Record by quarter:
    Q1: 2-2
    Q2: 3-1

    Surprises? Disappointments?
    Last edited by denverYooper; 10-29-2012, 11:48 AM.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

  • #2
    It seems as though they're playing overall better defense and not just living off of turnovers.
    Last edited by denverYooper; 10-29-2012, 11:50 AM.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

    Comment


    • #3
      DVOA numbers are only week 7. If I have time, I'll update the table once they post their week 8 numbers.
      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think it's interesting that the points given up per game is relatively close, despite defensive improvement. I'm not sure what to make of that; is it mostly a reflection of the drop in offensive production and better field position/more opportunities for the opposition...
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
          I think it's interesting that the points given up per game is relatively close, despite defensive improvement. I'm not sure what to make of that; is it mostly a reflection of the drop in offensive production and better field position/more opportunities for the opposition...
          Fewer turnovers. So there are more drives that go their natural distance. Meaning they probably have more stops on downs, but the field position battle is more favorable to the oppo this year.
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #6
            I forgot to add the 3rd down pct. for 2012

            D is at 36% (10th)
            Offense is 42% (12th)
            When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

            Comment


            • #7
              How about that deal where you hand a guy a ball and he runs somewhere with it?

              Or isn't that even worth keeping track of anymore?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                I think it's interesting that the points given up per game is relatively close, despite defensive improvement. I'm not sure what to make of that; is it mostly a reflection of the drop in offensive production and better field position/more opportunities for the opposition...
                My gut feeling is that it has to do with the turnovers. The defense is playing only about 1 snap more per game right now (66.7) than last year (65.5) giving up over a yard less per play so there could be a field position component as well.
                When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                  How about that deal where you hand a guy a ball and he runs somewhere with it?

                  Or isn't that even worth keeping track of anymore?
                  Lol. I'll add that.
                  When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    With the improvement in our defense we will be a formidable team once we get some of our offensive starters back in the lineup.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                      With the improvement in our defense we will be a formidable team once we get some of our offensive starters back in the lineup.
                      Do the stats show an improved defense? Maybe in yards allowed, but not in points allowed. Does it really matter how many yards you gain or give up?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Patler View Post
                        Do the stats show an improved defense? Maybe in yards allowed, but not in points allowed. Does it really matter how many yards you gain or give up?
                        My gut feel is that ayn is right - our O isn't as explosive, the other team is getting better starting field position.

                        Can we find out what the average start location of opponents drives is?
                        --
                        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Guiness View Post
                          My gut feel is that ayn is right - our O isn't as explosive, the other team is getting better starting field position.

                          Can we find out what the average start location of opponents drives is?
                          Gamebooks have it.
                          When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Patler View Post
                            Do the stats show an improved defense? Maybe in yards allowed, but not in points allowed. Does it really matter how many yards you gain or give up?
                            But the thing is we were taking the ball away at an astronomical rate last year. I think that we are definitely better this year. We're leading the league in sacks. Our secondary has had its slumps, but overall it has been harder to complete passes against us. Obviously the big loss is Nick Collins, but he was out most of last year too.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by BobDobbs View Post
                              But the thing is we were taking the ball away at an astronomical rate last year. I think that we are definitely better this year. We're leading the league in sacks. Our secondary has had its slumps, but overall it has been harder to complete passes against us. Obviously the big loss is Nick Collins, but he was out most of last year too.
                              Yet, the points against average is almost identical to last year.

                              The other factor to consider is that last year the offense was scoring so prolifically, that the defense was often protecting multi-score leads; and in the NFL for the last 40 years that means a "prevent" defense, the philosophy being that surrendering yards has little meaning if you use up the clock and/or hold them to a FG at most. The opponents were desperate to catch up, and took risks for quick scores, or scores of any type. More desperate play leads to more turnovers.

                              That said, I think they pieces are there for an improved defense, but in the end it matters most how many points are allowed. So far that hasn't changed a lot. Last year it was due to turnovers, this year sacks and maybe somewhat improved play overall.
                              Last edited by Patler; 10-30-2012, 04:38 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X