Here comes another "GIANT Nightmare"

[rbaloha1]

Slow painful loss.

[mmmdk]

I guarantee a Packers win!

[Bretsky]

you dudes know my mojo
I like finding thought intriguing articles and stirring the pot in my threads
If posting the thoughts elsewhere can help GB win I'm all for it

But my point that the Giants have the make up in the trenches to stick it to Green Bay again...............that's a definite possiblity.

I feel bad going into this one............which typically provided a decent end outcome so that's a good thing

[pbmax]

McCarthy said he was doubtful about Matthews. Essentially the same thing for Jennings, though he was slightly more circumspect there. Usually, he doesn't sandbag injuries or do a Lou Holtz routine.

With a relatively healthy team, the Packers O went up and down the field on that dominating Giants D line in the regular season. The D was its normal porous self in that game after a fast start. Then it played one of its better halves versus the G-Men in the playoffs only to have the O disappear.

Missing Jennings and having Finley living inside of his own nightmare (kind of like a Twilight Zone episode) means the Packer O has a tougher time using the passing game to make up for the running game versus the Cover 2.

Finley might be breaking out and Starks will at least knock some defenders on their keister. We'll see.

[Joemailman]

The 2 times the Packers haven't been able to beat the Giants in the playoffs, no one else could either. The Giants were in the middle of great playoff runs that resulted in Lombardi Trophies. So I don't know if the Giants had the Packers number any more than they had anyone else's number. When they are playing well, they can beat anyone. Their defense does have the ability, when playing well, to put pressure on the opposing QB without doing a lot of blitzing, although they haven't been playing like that lately.

By the way, for those who think the Packers have to play in a dome to beat a good team late in the season, I would point out that the temperature was 25 at game time and dropping when the Packers clobbered the Giants at Lambeau in 2010.

[Fritz]

The 2 times the Packers haven't been able to beat the Giants in the playoffs, no one else could either. The Giants were in the middle of great playoff runs that resulted in Lombardi Trophies. So I don't know if the Giants had the Packers number any more than they had anyone else's number. When they are playing well, they can beat anyone. Their defense does have the ability, when playing well, to put pressure on the opposing QB without doing a lot of blitzing, although they haven't been playing like that lately.

By the way, for those who think the Packers have to play in a dome to beat a good team late in the season, I would point out that the temperature was 25 at game time and dropping when the Packers clobbered the Giants at Lambeau in 2010.

I am highly curious as to how Finley plays, and if the Offense tries to get him the ball. I'd like to see them work the middle of the field with Finley, and get him going.

I was encouraged by the push the Packers' defensive line in the middle gave in the Leos game. I'd like to see that again. I'm hoping this defense is gaining confidence.

But we shall see.

[pbmax]

Pickett is having a whale of a year from an energy and penetration standpoint. The rest provided by Raji, Worthy, Neal and Daniels has really perked up his pass rush. If I was going to mind read, I also suspect spending some time in his familiar nose tackle spot has him excited too.

[Tony Oday]

The Pack lose in a laugher. 35-14.

[Pugger]

The Pack lose in a laugher. 35-14.

Unless our O line plays better than it did against the loins you might be right.

[Cheesehead Craig]

Packers will win, most will be happy here, some will be sad.

[denverYooper]

Unless our O line plays better than it did against the loins you might be right.

The Packers haven't lost by 14 or more since NO in 2008, when they lost 51-29. Under Rodgers and M3, they haven't been prone to getting totally blown out, though they have had some rough patches in individual games.

[Joemailman]

The Packers haven't lost by 14 or more since NO in 2008, when they lost 51-29. Under Rodgers and M3, they haven't been prone to getting totally blown out, though they have had some rough patches in individual games.

That is the last game where the Packers did not have a legitimate shot at winning the game. Every game since then, they have been within 7 points at some point in the 4th quarter. The Packers ability to stay competitive in a game in which they are not playing great is probably unmatched in the NFL.

[QBME]

IMHO- Eli is feeling the pressure from big brother. He is going to try and force the issue, much to his demise.

Pack 31
G Men 10

[Pugger]

Packers will win, most will be happy here, some will be sad.

Huh?

[Guiness]

With a relatively healthy team, the Packers O went up and down the field on that dominating Giants D line in the regular season. The D was its normal porous self in that game after a fast start. Then it played one of its better halves versus the G-Men in the playoffs only to have the O disappear.

You taught me new word! The plural of half is halves, spelt with a very. Didn't know that