Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IR - Designated to Return

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IR - Designated to Return

    From when it was first mentioned as a possible new provision, I never understood why it required designating the player at the time he is placed on IR. Why not just allow the team to bring back one player, any player, X weeks after going on IR? Why make a team predict the results of rehab before rehab even starts?

    You can have a guy like Benson, who doesn't recover, and the designation is worthless.
    You can also have a player who recovers much quicker than expected, but is ineligible to return because he was not designated at the time he was placed on IR.

    Why should it be necessary to make the designation at the time the player is placed on IR?

  • #2
    Originally posted by Patler View Post
    From when it was first mentioned as a possible new provision, I never understood why it required designating the player at the time he is placed on IR. Why not just allow the team to bring back one player, any player, X weeks after going on IR? Why make a team predict the results of rehab before rehab even starts?

    You can have a guy like Benson, who doesn't recover, and the designation is worthless.
    You can also have a player who recovers much quicker than expected, but is ineligible to return because he was not designated at the time he was placed on IR.

    Why should it be necessary to make the designation at the time the player is placed on IR?

    When I saw that Benson would not be back, I wondered why the team couldn't move that designation to a different player. It would make sense to do such a thing. And if you didn't have a player you wanted to give that designation to, the next time a guy got hurt, you could IR him, designate him to return, and have a free roster spot for the four or five weeks you needed.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #3
      Sam Shields is starting to look like a guy the designation would have been good for. They have already ruled him out this weekend. That's six games and seven weeks he has been out

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm not sure why the NFL and players did not make this a floating designation. Were they afraid of game-playing by teams? And if so, so what? So what if you designate Benson to return, then move it to Woodson or Shields? How does that bother any other teams?

        Weird that they didn't think this through. The only explanation I have, having helped negotiate a few contracts myself, is that lots of stuff gets thrown around right at the end of negotiations, when a deal is close. It doesn't always get thought through.
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Fritz View Post
          I'm not sure why the NFL and players did not make this a floating designation. Were they afraid of game-playing by teams? And if so, so what? So what if you designate Benson to return, then move it to Woodson or Shields? How does that bother any other teams?

          I can agree with that, yes.
          When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

          Comment


          • #6
            I felt the same way. Why not just have IR in football? 4 week IR. I don't understand why the NFL is different than other leagues in this regard.
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • #7
              just another stupid nfl rule that makes no sense'

              like the whole red flag after a turnover/touchdown bs. what harm does a coach throwing a flag on a play thats already being reviewed do

              so asshole in the nfl has to think those were somehow good ideas at one point

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                I'm not sure why the NFL and players did not make this a floating designation. Were they afraid of game-playing by teams? And if so, so what? So what if you designate Benson to return, then move it to Woodson or Shields? How does that bother any other teams?

                Weird that they didn't think this through. The only explanation I have, having helped negotiate a few contracts myself, is that lots of stuff gets thrown around right at the end of negotiations, when a deal is close. It doesn't always get thought through.
                Yes, why not because they can only use it on one player at a time anyway.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Its a player cost issue and probably a marquee franchise issue. The more flexibility you have with an IR list, the larger the number of players under contact that can be called upon, which effectively increases your roster number. Small revenue teams don't want to pay the freight of maintaining a returning to play IR and they don't want successful teams to be able to lock up more players.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X