PackerStats: NFL team-by-team injuries

[sharpe1027]

I think he was joking

I think I was joking.

[Zool]

Was I joking too? Very confused now.

[denverYooper]

I think I was joking.

I think you were joking.

[pbmax]

You typically don't know how injury-prone a player is until he plays in the NFL.

We had a poster, might still have him, who insisted it is a rule that any player who has a history of two major injuries (even if they are to minor body parts ) had to be ignored as a rule. They claimed this explained the colossal error that was the Justin Harrell pick. Everyone in the NFL knew this rule except Ted.

[denverYooper]

We had a poster, might still have him, who insisted it is a rule that any player who has a history of two major injuries (even if they are to minor body parts ) had to be ignored as a rule. They claimed this explained the colossal error that was the Justin Harrell pick. Everyone in the NFL knew this rule except Ted.

Ted is not one of those crazy stat heads. Everyone knows he just falls in love with how a guy looks in shorts

[sharpe1027]

We had a poster, might still have him, who insisted it is a rule that any player who has a history of two major injuries (even if they are to minor body parts ) had to be ignored as a rule. They claimed this explained the colossal error that was the Justin Harrell pick. Everyone in the NFL knew this rule except Ted.

I remember a similar discussion. I've always wanted to see evidence of a statistical correlation between past injuries and future injuries. I would guess that you might find it for certain, related injuries. For example, some injuries may never lead to a full recovery - thus there is an increased chance of re-injury. However, the above premise is that any injury history can predict future injuries that are totally unrelated. For example, Harrell's back injury was predicted because he tore his bicep in college.

At this point it is nothing more than a random theory without anything to back it up.

[denverYooper]

I remember a similar discussion. I've always wanted to see evidence of a statistical correlation between past injuries and future injuries. I would guess that you might find it for certain, related injuries. For example, some injuries may never lead to a full recovery - thus there is an increased chance of re-injury. However, the above premise is that any injury history can predict future injuries that are totally unrelated. For example, Harrell's back injury was predicted because he tore his bicep in college.

At this point it is nothing more than a random theory without anything to back it up.

Fucking Rock Gullickson.

[mraynrand]

Was I joking too? Very confused now.

Stop joking off!

[mraynrand]

I remember a similar discussion. I've always wanted to see evidence of a statistical correlation between past injuries and future injuries. I would guess that you might find it for certain, related injuries. For example, some injuries may never lead to a full recovery - thus there is an increased chance of re-injury. However, the above premise is that any injury history can predict future injuries that are totally unrelated. For example, Harrell's back injury was predicted because he tore his bicep in college.

At this point it is nothing more than a random theory without anything to back it up.

I see what you did there.

[Zool]

Stop joking off!

Is that why my eye-sight is going to shit?

[sharpe1027]

I see what you did there.

I am glad you saw it. I completely missed it.

[Guiness]

I remember a similar discussion. I've always wanted to see evidence of a statistical correlation between past injuries and future injuries. I would guess that you might find it for certain, related injuries. For example, some injuries may never lead to a full recovery - thus there is an increased chance of re-injury. However, the above premise is that any injury history can predict future injuries that are totally unrelated. For example, Harrell's back injury was predicted because he tore his bicep in college.

At this point it is nothing more than a random theory without anything to back it up.

Yup, all kinds of random. To try and pretend you can figure it out is crazy, there is so much that is just a fluke. Collin's injury is exhibit A. An obvious exception the other way is knees - if a guy has had a few knee injuries, you have to be all kinds of careful. Jason White comes to mind...

[sharpe1027]

Adrian Peterson: injury #1 LCL; injury #2 collar bone. Must be ignored and a colossal error.

[Freak Out]

Rodgers was injury prone....now isn't. Hooray!

[sharpe1027]

Rodgers was injury prone....now isn't. Hooray!

And there was much rejoicing.

Didn't Favre have the same degenerative hip condition that ended Bo Jackson's career? Injury prone!