Dynasty

[run pMc]

Those were some sexy broads. I wonder which one would've been kinkier?

My money's on Joan Collins.

[Fritz]

Probably right. But those seemingly "good" girls, well, we know what they're like underneath. That's why we all love Ziggy so much!

[pbmax]

Probably right. But those seemingly "good" girls, well, we know what they're like underneath. That's why we all love Ziggy so much!

She dated John Derek. Collins slept with Warren Beatty. Its a tough call.

[mraynrand]

Collins slept with Warren Beatty. Its a tough call.

who didn't?

[rbaloha1]

Weight is not the determining factor in SB trophies.
If it were, there would be a race to sign the fattest people on Earth. Then we could have Jillian Michaels weigh them and declare a winner without having to sit through all those terrible games that eat up our Sundays!

It's a copycat league. As soon as most teams go to size/weight, someone like Chip Kelly will come up with a speedy fast tempo team that outruns them. DC's are talking to college coaches now about how to defend the read option and the new wave of QB's going pro -- it won't be such a shock next season.

As much as I enjoy a McGinn opinion, I did feel like he was doing some cherry-picking in the article.
As another poster showed, the SEA D roster weighed less. They have bigger CBs and speedy undersized LBs. It's part of their scheme.

Please quit making this is a single issue -- it is not.

You quit cherry picking as mindset and coaching are also part of equation. Over a season generally bigger and faster players generally beat smaller and equal fast players.

I cry UNCLE!

[mraynrand]

Over a season generally bigger and faster players generally beat smaller and equal fast players.

Who was ever arguing this point?

[smuggler]

Those were some sexy broads. I wonder which one would've been kinkier?

Uprepped this post.

[mraynrand]

I cry U.N.C.L.E.!

fify



put that in your avatar and smoke it!

[mraynrand]

Those were some sexy broads. I wonder which one would've been kinkier?

repped for using 'broads' ... dames>broads

[woodbuck27]

flacco may have to sacrifice $ to keep boldin and the dude who returned the kickoff.

Jacoby Jones was 'the dude' that got in behind the 49ers deep coverage and burned the 49ers for an unexpected long pass TD.

[woodbuck27]

49 ers vs. Packers 43 carries 323 yards 4 rushing tds WIN

49 ers vs, Ravens 29 carries 182 yards 2 rushing tds LOSS

You Decide (not a political statement)

What strikes me about these stat comparisons is that the Ravens had two weeks to prepare their defense Vs the 49ers run; and still the 49ers piled up over 6 yards/carry. Regarding the Ravens winning that game. That result looked in doubt the way the 49ers roared back after the power failure.

If I'm Ted Thompson I'm looking very much at the 49ers as the team to beat in the NFC next season. He'd better be paying attention to what's going on in Seattle as well. One of the strongest features of the current NFC Champs is based in it's athleticism and physicality. Stated another way. It's based in the San Fran 49ers excellent physical condition and strengths.

I'm on the side of any Packer fan that maintains that we just cannot compete defensively because were not prepared enough to do so based in talent and experience. It's OK if TT decides to tear up the old plan, if that decision maintains some common sense. You cannot turn a Volkswagon into a Porsch. You cannot maintain that your a legitimate Super Bowl contender when your team has demonstrated a two year decline.

Ted Thompson has a criticle off season. Ted Thompson has to make tough decisions and 'demonstrate toughness' in doing so. Ted Thompson has to do alot to correct the Green Bay Packers. As a Packer fan I expect only one thing. To see some real effort but forth in that direction. It's time for change in Green Bay.

It's time to say goodbye to Charles Woodson's contract.

Ted Thompson needs 2013 to do a final analysis of our TE position and that may be without JerMichael Finley.

Ted Thompson has to use 2013 to critically assess B. J. Raji.

Ted Thompson needs to upgrade our LBer position with strength and speed. We need to see a push through the middle and a seal placed on the edge.

Every defensive player needs to be able to tackle. If a player fails to demonstrate that ability then he must be cut. I expect to see that done before our final 2013 roster is finalized.

All over out team needs to improve. The results of that will not show up in terms of a Super Bowl next season; but as a Packer fan I expect to see progress in terms of action and reaction.

GO PACKERS !

[mraynrand]

If I'm Ted Thompson I'm looking very much at the 49ers as the team to beat in the NFC next season. He'd better be paying attention to what's going on in Seattle as well. One of the strongest features of the current NFC Champs is based in it's athleticism and physicality. Stated another way. It's based in the San Fran 49ers excellent physical condition and strengths.

Fresh! Riveting! I've heard somewhere recently that larger, faster players are better than smaller equally fast players. In related news, soda pop is better cold than warm.

[hoosier]

It is better to live on your feet than to die on your knees.

[mraynrand]

It is better to live on your feet than to die on your knees.

It's better to die on your knees than crawl on your belly

[Pugger]

And they stay the same: The Packers are an extremely well-run organization, a GM that builds for depth and, and with a coaching staff that makes the best use of what they have, and doesn't carp about injuries. Packers are one of the handful of teams well-positioned to win the SB next year.

The modern NFL destroys dynasties, but a good organization and a few exceptional players in key positions can get you multiple titles.

If we think about it we kinda are a dynasty of sorts in today's NFL. We are usually in the hunt year after year and keep producing 10+ winning seasons even tho TT is drafting towards the bottom of each round in the draft. NE is another team that seems to be there every year for the same reasons.