Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

hawk restructures...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by red View Post
    you talk big shit for being someone so fucking stupid that they can't comprehend how NFL contracts really work
    You are the one who thinks that everyone else's REJECTS (that is what free agents are) are the holy grail of what will put us over the top.
    It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by red View Post
      you talk big shit for being someone so fucking stupid that they can't comprehend how NFL contracts really work

      i'm not saying we need to become the eagles from a few years ago where they signed everyone on the market

      but we need, a real safety, some might say an upgrade to hawk, we need to do something different on the d-line, we need a real center, a real left tackle, and an NFL caliber running back, not to mention a decent backup QB

      one or two of those areas could have been addressed this week, the draft will not fix all those issues
      Originally posted by King Friday View Post
      You are the one who thinks that everyone else's REJECTS (that is what free agents are) are the holy grail of what will put us over the top.
      You idiots are both right!
      [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by pbmax View Post
        Anyone have the numbers? Haven't see a thing yet. In 2013 his base is, $4,900,000, pro-rated signing bonus is $1,600,000, other bonus is 550,000 and the cap hit is $ 7,050,000.

        I would imagine, as I saw it was a one year only adjustment and an absolute paycut not a restructure, that he reduced his base salary down to $1 mil or below for 2013. So his savings to cap would be close to $4 million. Down from seven to 3 million.
        Now I just read on Twitter (GBPGazette) that the deal modified all 3 remaining years. Could be anything in that deal now.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by PFT
          http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ture-contract/

          A.J. Hawk agrees to restructure contract.

          Posted by Josh Alper on March 15, 2013, 5:28 PM EDT

          [I]" The numbers aren’t available yet, but PFT has confirmed that Hawk has agreed to redo the final three years of his deal. It was an expected move as Hawk stood to count $7.05 million against the salary cap for the 2013 season, a number that was getting in the way of Green Bay making other moves.
          I'm surprised no one commented on this, or did only I find it funny? What other moves????

          I'm not saying they should've, I'm saying this guy is the only one with the illusion that the Pack might make some moves
          --
          Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

          Comment


          • #35
            Silverstein thinks they will have a shot to know the numbers Monday, or shortly thereafter.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Pugger View Post
              And a woman.
              Yo Pug.

              Yeah, the stupid money season is tough on Packer fans of both sexes.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                Yo Pug.

                Yeah, the stupid money season is tough on Packer fans of both sexes.
                Yes indeed. It ain't fun to watch other teams seemly improve by adding veterans while we sit on the sidelines.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                  Yes indeed. It ain't fun to watch other teams seemly improve by adding veterans while we sit on the sidelines.
                  And yet just moments ago it struck me that no matter what we want or who we pick up after all the big names are gone, we always seem to field a team in which EVERYONE makes some sort of contribution. There's no dead wood--when a big name goes down, we are deep enough that there is someone behind them who can still be effective. They may not have the biggest names, but they get their jobs done. TT is good at that.
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Just read an Ask Vic Column and he said something I've said myself many times now.

                    The goal isn't the super bowl. The Goal is getting into the playoffs every year so that you have a shot at the super bowl. The moment you start spending big this year is the moment you gamble away your future. This is not 1993 when free agency was new. There will be no more sure thing Reggie Whites. Never ever again. The closest you're going to get is a calculated risk. Charles Woodson came off a broken Leg. Drew Brees had a messed up throwing arm. These game changers always came with an asterisk so big that most of the league ignored them and the team that chanced on them won. That's not the norm, it's the anomaly. You don't win games in FA. You win them in the draft. If someone comes by that's a no brainer? Great. Pick him up. If SJ would have fallen into our laps, no one would complain. The second you start sacrificing your future to get a shot at the playoffs though, I think that's when you've already lost. There's a reason you don't see teams make big FA splashes year after year. It's because they eventually run out of money.
                    - Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hawk's contract cut 7.25 mil over 3 years. Will receive 10.6 mil instead of 17.85 mil. http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/198844231.html
                      I can't run no more
                      With that lawless crowd
                      While the killers in high places
                      Say their prayers out loud
                      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                      A thundercloud
                      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        wow, huge cut

                        damn near half

                        now maybe people can stop bitching about him. hawk is not a bad middle LB for 4 million or so

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          looking at the numbers, he's gonna get almost 1.5 million less in salary this year and next and about 2 million less in 2015

                          new cap numbers for him are

                          2013- 5.2 million
                          2014- 6.15
                          2015- 6.25

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            I like this entire contract much more now. He still made out OK for a second contract for a non-elite player and the hit is heavy over the last three years. But he made some good coin right out of the gate on this deal.
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I think Thompson was very frank with Hawk. He told him that if he were to be cut, the chances of him securing a deal any better than what the Packers were offering as a renegotiation was remote. Based on what is happening in free agency, Hawk probably can surmise that Thompson is speaking the truth. Hawk is going to play best in the Packer system, where he has gained a comfort level and is surrounded by a number of other capable players to help manage Hawk's weaknesses. Going somewhere else means he has to start all over again...and probably takes a step back around the same time his athletic abilities start to decline. Not really a great scenario.

                              Hawk is very valuable to the Packers. He knows the system. He rarely is injured. He is a leader on the field and in the locker room. I think this is a win for both sides. Hawk can remain in Green Bay until his career is basically over...and the Packers don't have to look for his replacement for 2+ years.
                              It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by King Friday View Post
                                I think Thompson was very frank with Hawk. He told him that if he were to be cut, the chances of him securing a deal any better than what the Packers were offering as a renegotiation was remote. Based on what is happening in free agency, Hawk probably can surmise that Thompson is speaking the truth. Hawk is going to play best in the Packer system, where he has gained a comfort level and is surrounded by a number of other capable players to help manage Hawk's weaknesses. Going somewhere else means he has to start all over again...and probably takes a step back around the same time his athletic abilities start to decline. Not really a great scenario.

                                Hawk is very valuable to the Packers. He knows the system. He rarely is injured. He is a leader on the field and in the locker room. I think this is a win for both sides. Hawk can remain in Green Bay until his career is basically over...and the Packers don't have to look for his replacement for 2+ years.
                                I am not sure that TT tells him that stuff. I think Hawk's agent make those calculations and tell his player "We might want to take this or get about the same or less somewhere else."
                                [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X