Originally posted by Bretsky
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Green Bay Packers' B. J. Raji not worried about (New) contract
Collapse
X
-
The Eagle Oakie was the base 3-4 last year. Jolly at 1 tech, Raji at 3, Wilson at 5 or 7 (probably 7) and then Matthews and Walden at OLB and DE depending a O strength.Originally posted by wist43 View PostCapers does exactly nothing to put him positions to make plays. That said, it wouldn't make sense to resign Raji unless they fire Capers.
That's 4-3. Under front I believe with Raji at 3 tech. This defense still struggled with defending the run, though not as bad as 2011. Next idea please.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Substitute Perry for Walden, D. Jones for Wilson, and Jolly for Jolly, lol...Originally posted by pbmax View PostThe Eagle Oakie was the base 3-4 last year. Jolly at 1 tech, Raji at 3, Wilson at 5 or 7 (probably 7) and then Matthews and Walden at OLB and DE depending a O strength.
That's 4-3. Under front I believe with Raji at 3 tech. This defense still struggled with defending the run, though not as bad as 2011. Next idea please.
Yeah, I could live with that a lot easier than taking one of the DL off the field and putting Brad Jones in there.
Packer4life commented about Neal standing up in 2-4... I don't think he can play standing up, but I'd be willing to give it an audition. If not Neal, then put some effort into finding an athletic tweener and scheme to take advantage of that.
That's why I had my eye on a guy like Cornelius Washington - he played like a slug as a Sr, but watch his Jr year, and that's the type of player we need roving and wrecking havoc in sub-packages.
I just use Washington as an example... he played so poorly as a Sr, I don't know that I would have drafted him - but I would have been on the look out for that type of player.
TT passed on so many guys that could have helped though, and he threw a bunch of money at Brad Jones... so that tells ya right there that he sees defensive players differently than just about anyone else on the planet.
I have absolutely no idea how TT evaluates front seven personnel, but it certainly isn't with a care in the world about how their strengths and weaknesses fit, or don't fit, a scheme. He's said more than once that he cares more about drafting "good football players", and how they fit a particular scheme is a secondary consideration.
That's how we've ended up coming to own the Island of Misfit Toys.wist
Comment
-
"Oh, I'll NEVER fit in!"Originally posted by wist43 View PostThat's how we've ended up coming to own the Island of Misfit Toys.

Maybe as a tweener on the Packers' front seven!"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
That should be Pickett at 1 tech.Originally posted by pbmax View PostThe Eagle Oakie was the base 3-4 last year. Jolly at 1 tech, Raji at 3, Wilson at 5 or 7 (probably 7) and then Matthews and Walden at OLB and DE depending a O strength.
That's 4-3. Under front I believe with Raji at 3 tech. This defense still struggled with defending the run, though not as bad as 2011. Next idea please.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment

Comment