If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
He might be, but then you have asked your best player on D, Matthews, to change positions or change his role. Its going to be a weird fit either way.
Raji has done it. The question is whether he wishes to do it more often.
I don't expect the Packers to go to a 4-3 (even if it's my preferred defense). My comment was more directed that perhaps Raji would do better as a 4-3 DT and would rather play for a team that plays that scheme instead of in GB. His contract demands are aligned as such as to make the Packers really think hard if they want to pay him it. It would be a case of that he'll stay and play a position he's not overly crazy about but the Packers will have to pay him a premium to do it.
I don't expect the Packers to go to a 4-3 (even if it's my preferred defense). My comment was more directed that perhaps Raji would do better as a 4-3 DT and would rather play for a team that plays that scheme instead of in GB. His contract demands are aligned as such as to make the Packers really think hard if they want to pay him it. It would be a case of that he'll stay and play a position he's not overly crazy about but the Packers will have to pay him a premium to do it.
Just a thought about the situation.
Raji is a much better 4-3 dt than a ng in the 3-4.
Comment