Would our receiving core be THAT desperate?

[hoosier]

Your post somehow enabled me to finally get something off of my chest. To address something sickening to me as a Packer fan.

When I read something as positive as Donald Driver said:

Why in hell, in any way, turn that into any negative?

I think you confuse realism with negativity. Or maybe you're confusing an opinion someone offers on the internet about Driver's football ability with what you would say to him face to face. But for better or worse, most of us don't get to talk with Packer players face to face, so this forum is what we have--and it has its benefits.

[hoosier]

I didn't in any reasonableness go to whatever? and bringing Donald Driver back. That simply isn't going to happen. That's not relevant to my position.

What bothered me is that any Packer fan would take his statement of loyalty and turn that in any manner against him pbmax. Any such post is a gross over reaction to Donald Drivers obvious loyalty.

GO PACK GO !

Do you really think that if Driver thought he could still play at a high level and some team offered him a contract that he would be content to sit at home? Loyalty is wonderful but in this case I strongly suspect it is the sign of a player who knows when to call it quits. More power to Driver for being able to take his ego out of the equation.

[woodbuck27]

Do you really think that if Driver thought he could still play at a high level and some team offered him a contract that he would be content to sit at home? Loyalty is wonderful but in this case I strongly suspect it is the sign of a player who knows when to call it quits. More power to Driver for being able to take his ego out of the equation.

Yes it's likely just that hoosier.

I'm guessing that he and TT had a clear understanding that last season would be his last. As NFL fans and Packer fans we know that it's by far best for a player such as he was to play for and retire from that 'one' team. I didn't read too much into Donald Driver saying that his 'loyalty' to the Green Bay Packers would 'if needed'. Extend to making some comeback (and remaining in shape) in case that ever became a reality.

I forgive that possible (maybe deemed gaff) from a player as solid as he was; and his first year of retirement. It's hard to remove oneself from the game you loved so much. Were so dedicated too for so long.

GO PACKERS !

[Guiness]

By terrible I am assuming you mean compared to NFL caliber WRs. He is still a better WR than me.

I've got a whippet (see my avatar) that catches a frisbee like nobody's business. I bet she's a better WR than you!

[Guiness]

In other, hopefully unrelated news, Chad Johnson has announced he wants a last go-around.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/22463626/video-chad-johnson-says-hed-like-to-finish-career-the-right-way

(complete with Gif of the fateful lawyer buttslap that earned him 7 days in jail)

[hoosier]

But Thunder Dan is a better blocker. Your dog would have to come out on running plays. Unless she's getting the ball (I bet her change of direction is better than Dan's too).

[Fritz]

No ... let's not place any weight on my experience as a Green Bay Packer fan. Let's go to my ability to debate and use my intelligence pbmax against a formidable foe. YOU packer fan.

No ... pbmax you question the validity of my opinions because their in your face. Because my opinions do NOT embrace the status quo of so many Packer fans here that don't have a clue in terms of respect for 'loyalty'.

You want to debate this pbmax then lay it on me. I welcome you and that pbmax. Let's air it out right here and now Packer fan. Let's see what you've got? Let's get down to the question of decency and respect. I'm sure that will draw a large audience. I'm up for the challenge.

If you simply choose to focus on my reaction and this thread:

I didn't in any reasonableness go to whatever? and bringing Donald Driver back. That simply isn't going to happen. That's not relevant to my position.

What bothered me is that any Packer fan would take his statement of loyalty and turn that in any manner against him pbmax. Any such post is a gross over reaction to Donald Drivers obvious loyalty.

GO PACK GO !

Sometimes you write these clear, almost-terse statements that make a lot of sense. Sometimes I don't agree at all with your opinions. But most of the time, I'm not sure what your opinion actually is. I don't try to read your posts so much as try to navigate them, Wood.

But we're good, Wood. Say hi to Mae. And take your meds!

[woodbuck27]

Sometimes you write these clear, almost-terse statements that make a lot of sense. Sometimes I don't agree at all with your opinions. But most of the time, I'm not sure what your opinion actually is. I don't try to read your posts so much as try to navigate them, Wood.

But we're good, Wood. Say hi to Mae. And take your meds!

Sorry Packer fan. This place simply gets to me sometimes. I get my Irish on. I get very pissed off. It's got little to do with needing any med's. It's all about some of the stupid jerks here.

Ahh Mae. She's good. We're celebrating an anniversary today and tomorrow.

Thanks 'for some brakes' Fritz.

GO PACK GO !

[pbmax]

What bothered me is that any Packer fan would take his statement of loyalty and turn that in any manner against him pbmax. Any such post is a gross over reaction to Donald Drivers obvious loyalty.

Then its a very simple question we should debate. I responded to this statement:

What is wrong with some of you 'Packer fans'? What does it take to please some of you 'Packer fans'?

Yours was post 6 and that means there were five before it. What statement did you object to? What statement was turned against Driver?

[Guiness]

But Thunder Dan is a better blocker. Your dog would have to come out on running plays. Unless she's getting the ball (I bet her change of direction is better than Dan's too).

vertical is off the charts too. Here's a distant cuz showing off

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSHqm7XcP8U&t=1m29s

[mraynrand]

.... It's all about some of the stupid jerks here.

to thine own self be true!

[ThunderDan]

vertical is off the charts too. Here's a distant cuz showing off

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSHqm7XcP8U&t=1m29s

Wow, now I am the whipping boy for the dog that can jump out of the building.

Just so you know I could put a basketball down two handed in college when I weighed 190 lbs.

[Scott Campbell]

I think you confuse realism with negativity. Or maybe you're confusing an opinion someone offers on the internet about Driver's football ability with what you would say to him face to face. But for better or worse, most of us don't get to talk with Packer players face to face, so this forum is what we have--and it has its benefits.

[Scott Campbell]

Sorry Packer fan. This place simply gets to me sometimes. I get my Irish on. I get very pissed off. It's got little to do with needing any med's. It's all about some of the stupid jerks here.

[RashanGary]

You know what, Woodbuck, I'm glad for you that you went off a little. I've long had a feeling that people not being loyal bothered the living piss out of you, but you never really said it. You were more passive-aggressive by my view.

The nice thing about aggressiveness, it's more direct. It gives people a chance to challenge you and now it gives you a chance to ignore that type of thing because it's NEVER going to change.

I know you're 68 years old and the greatest man in Canada, but I figure even Canada's greatest man might appreciate a little helpful criticism. I think you want to be accepted here, and you are. If you want to be even more accepted, I think it might be a good idea to not add, "go packers" or "Packers" to posts that have nothing to do with the Packers. You've come out here, pretty much showing your true colors, that the disloyalty disgusts you. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems pretty clear to me that you use that "go packers" thing as a way to sort of parade your wonderfulness around in the faces of the disgusting, non-true Packer fans. It's not exactly the olive branch of togetherness your mind would have you convinced of.