Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GET OUTTA MY HEAD BOB!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by King Friday View Post
    Well, since 18 other NFL teams also refuse to do live tackling, I guess I could reasonably assume that 18 other teams must have atrocious injury situations this preseason. However, Bobby did not note that all those other NFL teams also experienced high rates of injury. So why does the lack of live tackling ONLY hurt the Packers?
    Bob was selective with his reporting. It should be simple to get the data from each team about how many practices had live tackling and how long the sessions were. Then put that in a table with player-days missed for practices and for games. When we see the raw data, we can have a better idea of if there is any meaning behind what he wrote. Even from that limited list, I didn't see any correlation between the live tacking and how good a team was.

    Also he makes a big deal about the practice that got cancelled, but refuses to acknowledge that it was a planned cancel.
    2025 Ratpickers champion.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
      And you let the old lady cuff you and throw in the back of the school bus preparing for....... Never mind................
      Your high school experience was way better than mine.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by pbmax View Post
        If a fighter gets hurt before his fight, they postpone it. And he practices with a bubble around his head.
        These guys don't practice with a bubble on their heads?
        Originally posted by Upnorth View Post
        I was never any good at boxing but I was frequently asked to be a sparring partner. Never did we intentionaly hit hard. The one getting ready for the fight sure hit hard though as my slightly crooked nose proves.
        I wouldn't expect them to go full speed. Sounds like you should have hit back harder. Nutz or Skinbasket can probably train you for sweet revenge.

        Originally posted by King Friday View Post
        Well, since 18 other NFL teams also refuse to do live tackling, I guess I could reasonably assume that 18 other teams must have atrocious injury situations this preseason. However, Bobby did not note that all those other NFL teams also experienced high rates of injury. So why does the lack of live tackling ONLY hurt the Packers?

        Honestly, I'm wondering if it is more about diet and/or conditioning than live tackling. I really don't see how numerous muscle strains can be prevented by doing live tackling drills.
        I would like to see the records of the teams that do.

        Comment


        • #19
          The article is nothing but speculation. Too bad, it could be an interesting topic if he had gathered some substance. for it.

          Speaking of unsubstantiated speculation, I have thrown out another hypothesis for the seeming increase in Packer injuries in recent years, but haven't had the desire or time to really dig into. The fancy-ass turf they put in Lambeau, and have since put on the practice field(s?). If I remember correctly, it came out as the next great thing, combining the features of a synthetic turf with those of natural grass, but after initial excitement for it, some stadiums backed away from it, saying it emphasized the negative aspects of each. When the Packers first announced that they would put it in Lambeau, I remember feeling uneasy about it.

          Comment


          • #20
            But is there enough synthetic fibers in the grass to really make a difference? I thought I read they stitched something like 10% into the grass to help keep it together and viable once the weather got cold...?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Patler View Post
              The article is nothing but speculation. Too bad, it could be an interesting topic if he had gathered some substance. for it.

              Speaking of unsubstantiated speculation, I have thrown out another hypothesis for the seeming increase in Packer injuries in recent years, but haven't had the desire or time to really dig into. The fancy-ass turf they put in Lambeau, and have since put on the practice field(s?). If I remember correctly, it came out as the next great thing, combining the features of a synthetic turf with those of natural grass, but after initial excitement for it, some stadiums backed away from it, saying it emphasized the negative aspects of each. When the Packers first announced that they would put it in Lambeau, I remember feeling uneasy about it.
              It would be interesting to see if there is a correlation between DD GrassMaster and injuries, but my guess would be that there isn't. Knee, ankle and toe injuries are most likely to be turf related, but then again they happen on all types of turf. There were a number of muscle injuries, which would point to more a conditioning or warmup problem. Minor point, but the turf was in the practice field in 2005, and installed in Lambeau several years later.

              Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Denver use in their stadiums, I don't know about their practice fields.
              2025 Ratpickers champion.

              Comment


              • #22
                Doesn't grassmaster use all real grass? The difference is that the sod/dirt is stitched together so it does not tear up. It provides a solid foundation that won't tear apart even when wet or cold?

                The turf that had synthetic fibres along with the actual grass blades was torn out after a year or two because whenever it got wet (even dewy) players slipped on it like it was a plastic garbage bag spread out over the field. That was during Sherman's time and we had to scout pregame reports about the length of cleats players were wearing.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                  Doesn't grassmaster use all real grass? The difference is that the sod/dirt is stitched together so it does not tear up. It provides a solid foundation that won't tear apart even when wet or cold?

                  The turf that had synthetic fibres along with the actual grass blades was torn out after a year or two because whenever it got wet (even dewy) players slipped on it like it was a plastic garbage bag spread out over the field. That was during Sherman's time and we had to scout pregame reports about the length of cleats players were wearing.
                  From the maker:
                  What is DESSO GrassMaster® hybrid grass?

                  A DESSO GrassMaster ® hybrid grass pitch is a 100% natural sport grass pitch reinforced by millions of Desso artificial turf fibres.

                  with a patented technique, specialised installers inject 20 million Desso artificial turf fibres in a natural grass mat
                  the natural grass roots intertwine with the 20 cm deep injected artificial turf fibres
                  result: a high-tech, stable pitch that can take 3 times as much playing than a normal, natural grass pitch
                  From the Packers:
                  Field: Installed in 2007, the top level of the field system is 12 inches of root-zone sand and Kentucky bluegrass turf. DD GrassMaster synthetic fibers are stitched into the surface, providing strength and stability to the field. Fibers extend approximately seven inches below the surface and are exposed approximately one inch above the surface and are spaced every three-quarters of an inch. Approximately 20 million individual stitches make up the process.
                  2025 Ratpickers champion.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I was wrong, at least partially. those artificial fibres are inserter vertically. 2 cm above the dirt. Watch video to see Lambeau shoutout.

                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I'm totally confused now. I thought that in 2007, the Packers installed the Donald Driver (DD) Bassmaster, bass-o-matic

                      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        This article is crap. It's Bob tossing a bone to the "Packers are too small/weak" crowd to get them riled up.

                        I'm not saying the premise itself is horrible, but having data tracking injuries and IR'ed players for the 19 non-tackling teams vs the 13 tackling would make his case a lot stronger.
                        Go PACK

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Bossman641 View Post
                          This article is crap. It's Bob tossing a bone to the "Packers are too small/weak" crowd to get them riled up.

                          I'm not saying the premise itself is horrible, but having data tracking injuries and IR'ed players for the 19 non-tackling teams vs the 13 tackling would make his case a lot stronger.
                          I'd bet that he did check all the teams and if the data had actually supported his premise that it would have been fully included as a table at the end of the article?
                          2025 Ratpickers champion.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            It is a lazy article.
                            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                            KYPack

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X