Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Secondary Injuries

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Secondary Injuries

    Journal-Sentinel now says Hayward is expected to miss a month and "they hope" to have him back after the bye for Detroit. Hamstring.

    Also Morgan Burnett questionable for tomorrow with a hamstring.

    This training camp injury crap is just awful. AWFUL.

    These hammy pulls can linger all damn season too. We are going to be thin right from the get-go.

  • #2
    Originally posted by VegasPackFan View Post
    Journal-Sentinel now says Hayward is expected to miss a month and "they hope" to have him back after the bye for Detroit. Hamstring.

    Also Morgan Burnett questionable for tomorrow with a hamstring.

    This training camp injury crap is just awful. AWFUL.

    These hammy pulls can linger all damn season too. We are going to be thin right from the get-go.

    I would hope and imagine that the Packer staff researches the number of hammy injuries they suffer versus the other teams.

    This is ridiculous. Losing Burnett - probably about the fourth player you could least afford to lose on this team for a game - is a big blow.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #3
      What happened to our off-season soft-tissue-injury navel-gazing?

      This is why I don't feel reassured when people point to our injury rate from last year. If we couldn't keep our guys healthy from non-contact injuries last season, why should we be any different this time around?
      I believe in God, family, Baylor University, and the Green Bay Packers.

      Comment


      • #4
        Packers had another year where hamstring injuries were prevalent and they managed to get that under control. I wonder of these latest are heat related (it finally got hot) or if they are just end of camp fatigue.

        Jones and Burnett had much more mild hamstring injuries than Hayward originally had. Jones and Burnett were just sore earlier this week after returning.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hayward is sort of a blow. He's pretty solid and now misses 25% of the season. Rumor had it the Vikings wanted him with Josh Robinson second on the list.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Rastak View Post
            Hayward is sort of a blow. He's pretty solid and now misses 25% of the season. Rumor had it the Vikings wanted him with Josh Robinson second on the list.
            Hang on, hang on, wait 'til we're done with him.
            [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Rastak View Post
              Hayward is sort of a blow. He's pretty solid and now misses 25% of the season. Rumor had it the Vikings wanted him with Josh Robinson second on the list.
              Is there a player on the Packers' roster that the Vikings DON'T want???
              sigpic

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Iron Mike View Post
                Is there a player on the Packers' roster that the Vikings DON'T want???
                Going out on a limb here...Mason Crosby?

                There's a web site for everything now...http://www.aidyourhamstring.com/hams...endon-tear.php

                There are probably things that can be done to try and prevent hammy injuries, but nothing that would fully prevent them, short of not playing
                Last edited by Carolina_Packer; 09-08-2013, 08:23 AM.
                "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by swede View Post
                  Hang on, hang on, wait 'til we're done with him.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Iron Mike View Post
                    Is there a player on the Packers' roster that the Vikings DON'T want???

                    Anyone on your offensive line and none of your running backs.



                    I would consider your QB.......

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What a relief to know Sitton and Lacey are safe from being Vikingized.
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Sitton and Lang would be a huge upgrade on Fusco and Johnson. The Vikings do have a major advantage at OT though.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X