Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers may be without injured S Burnett vs Wash.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers may be without injured S Burnett vs Wash.



    [I]Packers may be without injured S Burnett vs Wash.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Well fucking Christ already. We played balls out awesome run D against one of the best rushing teams in the NFL going 2.6 a rush...and now we play another great rushing team...yet Burnett is hurt..is Hayward gonna play?

    I like Burnett but after having watched all the games I never saw how he earned his huge contract extension ala the playmakers at Safety like Leroy Butler and Nick Collins...those safeties made plays to win games. Burnett doesn't suck but he really is not a gamechanger...so what's up with his contract?

    On the other hand, Hayward looks like a young ballhawking Charles Woodson (who Snake is pref to...that dude was a pro's pro and made plays all over the field). Either way, we need those two guys back ASAP. I don't think it will matter as RG3 is overrated only in the fact that he's the same build style (albeit more efficient as a passer) as Vick and neither seems like they will be able to stay on the field with their running style at their slight builds.

    I see GB pissed off and AROD going for 4+ TDs in a 42-24 romp. I see Lacy breaking out with a big run or two for the first 100 yard game by a GB running back since 2010.
    Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

  • #2
    Hayward is out for 4 weeks.

    Burnett has been hampered by the lack of a 2nd competent safety. He's been playing 1.5 spots.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by SnakeLH2006 View Post

      I see GB pissed off and AROD going for 4+ TDs in a 42-24 romp. I see Lacy breaking out with a big run or two for the first 100 yard game by a GB running back since 2010.
      I second this prediction, unless Sitton sits.
      One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
      John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes, if Sitton sits we're screwed with all of these injuries. Don't be surprised if we end up 0-2 by Sunday evening.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by denverYooperNotReally View Post
          Burnett has been hampered by the lack of a 2nd competent hamstring.
          Fixed.
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #6
            On the bright side our second and third string safeties are getting valuable playing time.
            Does Washington have a zone beater like boldin to pick up a couple hundred yards? I don't think so, so I think we win.
            All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

            George Orwell

            Comment


            • #7
              The real knee slapper is on Redskins forums those guys say Morris is a better RB than Gore.

              Comment


              • #8
                They can win without Burnett. They have time to coach-up the safeties and maybe make some personnel adjustments. It will be better, even if not fixed.

                The safeties took bad angles. The can make some improvement.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                  The real knee slapper is on Redskins forums those guys say Morris is a better RB than Gore.
                  I don't think that statement is to far from true. Gore may have a bigger body of work but it is only Morris 2nd year and Gore is 30, right when typical rb's wear down. Gore has taken a pounding through out the years.
                  All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

                  George Orwell

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Gore in his prime smokes Morris. Morris cannot catch passes and has slow 4.6 40 speed. Gore is not much faster, but is capable of taking one to the house.

                    Obviously, Morris has more value now, as Gore is 30. Hunter and James will probably take the torch next year, but we will see.
                    "In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I agree that Gore was pretty good for a bit, but at 30 he's not the same...Morris is younger/better now.

                      But can anyone explain to Snake how Burnett is that good (given his big contract extension)? I've seen EVERY game since 1991 and have NEVER thought ONCE that Burnett could hold a candle to Leroy, Collins, or even Woodson as a safety. I'm not saying he sucks, but how did he get that contract? I've never seen that guy make a difference in a game. Hayward as a rookie made play after play...almost Woodson-like. Anyone?
                      Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by SnakeLH2006 View Post
                        I agree that Gore was pretty good for a bit, but at 30 he's not the same...Morris is younger/better now.

                        But can anyone explain to Snake how Burnett is that good (given his big contract extension)? I've seen EVERY game since 1991 and have NEVER thought ONCE that Burnett could hold a candle to Leroy, Collins, or even Woodson as a safety. I'm not saying he sucks, but how did he get that contract? I've never seen that guy make a difference in a game. Hayward as a rookie made play after play...almost Woodson-like. Anyone?
                        Never made a difference? Hmmm...

                        "In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by packer4life View Post
                          i'm not jagging you bro, but I saw that game. Good play, but he's not a difference maker. Woodson, Collins and Butler did it EVERY other game. I don't think Burnett sucks, but he's not a diff maker IMO. I never thought Oh God don't throw it near Burnett or shit Burnett is gonna force a fumble. I still don't see how he got paid. He's ok....but nowhere near All-Pro like those 3 guys I named.
                          Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by SnakeLH2006 View Post
                            I agree that Gore was pretty good for a bit, but at 30 he's not the same...Morris is younger/better now.

                            But can anyone explain to Snake how Burnett is that good (given his big contract extension)? I've seen EVERY game since 1991 and have NEVER thought ONCE that Burnett could hold a candle to Leroy, Collins, or even Woodson as a safety. I'm not saying he sucks, but how did he get that contract? I've never seen that guy make a difference in a game. Hayward as a rookie made play after play...almost Woodson-like. Anyone?
                            Burnett is a hell of lot better than Jennings and/or McMillan and wife.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              So any word on Burnett?
                              Draft Brandin Cooks WR OSU!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X