Bob, done for the moment diving Packer directives from goat entrails and sniffing packets on the Packers wireless network, comes up with a gem of an article about Neal's switch to OLB and how it came to be.
Started with Kevin Green (2 years ago) and seems to have been endorsed by Trgo who convinced Capers who in turn convinced McCarthy. McCarthy calls it an "elephant" type position and when he is standing over the O tackle it might be, but that doesn't explain his INT from ILB versus the Redskins.
Bob of course, needing to drive readers into a panic, then concocts a scenario where Neal gets 8 sacks and suddenly is in demand like Paul Kruger or Desmond Bryant and will command a 5 year, $34 to 40 million deal. Bob also fits in a mention that he thought the move was pure desperation and doomed to fail. So, you know, that contract thing could easily happen ...
Started with Kevin Green (2 years ago) and seems to have been endorsed by Trgo who convinced Capers who in turn convinced McCarthy. McCarthy calls it an "elephant" type position and when he is standing over the O tackle it might be, but that doesn't explain his INT from ILB versus the Redskins.
"There were certain things I didn't think we needed to be using him anymore," said McCarthy. "We were trying to create pass rush from within. I thought it was intriguing to create this 'elephant' position.
Bob of course, needing to drive readers into a panic, then concocts a scenario where Neal gets 8 sacks and suddenly is in demand like Paul Kruger or Desmond Bryant and will command a 5 year, $34 to 40 million deal. Bob also fits in a mention that he thought the move was pure desperation and doomed to fail. So, you know, that contract thing could easily happen ...

Comment