Also, Jones and Francois both got injured? Good god. Anything serious? How was Lattimore?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official packers - lions game thread 10/6/2013
Collapse
X
-
-How did Burnett and the safeties in general look?Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostDidn't get a chance to see the game.
A few questions
Better in close (Burnett) same shaky tackling deep (Jennings). McMillan was still dime CB and was OK. They allowed their usual assortment of crossing route completions and a couple throws down the middle.
-I see we only gave up 1 sack. Was that from good protection, quick throws, or was Rodgers just barely getting rid of it before getting drilled?
Compared to usual Lions games, pass pro was solid. Overall it was average. Rodgers had time and only once or twice was someone in his lap. he took no hard shots I remember.
-How was the run blocking?
Stunningly good, thought the Lions were playing six in the box.
-Who was the 3rd down back? I'm guessing not Franklin?
Lacy and Cobb
-How was our pressure on Stafford? I see 5 sacks but was that due to heavy blitzing?
Moderate blitzing, about Capers average but def. not heavy. Best news was Neal (1) and Perry (2) got sacks.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Well see in McGinn's ratings column, but I thought it was a pretty average blitz day.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostYes, the Packers were sending 5 most passing downs. Lions were short of receivers, and the Packers seemed to contain Bush on screens and outletsBud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Lacy had 99yds. Cobb was sprung for a huge 67 yd run. Burnett played well. We had to rush 5-6 sometimes to get pressure.Originally posted by Upnorth View PostSuh and fairly play? Looks like we ran well so by stats alone they look good. Did burnett play? Also perry and Neal with sacks, do we have pass rush now?
Also Crosby 5/5 wow.
Suh had a stupid tripping call on Rodgers that helped extend a drive. Burnett had an awesome pass defensed. A WR broke free in end zone and made up the gap and stuck his handout with back turned to QB. Knocked it away and saved a TD.-digital dean
No "TROLLS" allowed!
Comment
-
I agree. It was a workmanlike effort. Not a lot of standout performances but not a lot of goats either. Took care of business. Next week will be an intriguing game.Originally posted by pbmax View PostWell see in McGinn's ratings column, but I thought it was a pretty average blitz day."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
So burnett looked good! That is music to my ears maybe now we can have a consistent game instead of the massive lapses we seem to have.Originally posted by digitaldean View PostLacy had 99yds. Cobb was sprung for a huge 67 yd run. Burnett played well. We had to rush 5-6 sometimes to get pressure.
Suh had a stupid tripping call on Rodgers that helped extend a drive. Burnett had an awesome pass defensed. A WR broke free in end zone and made up the gap and stuck his handout with back turned to QB. Knocked it away and saved a TD.All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.
George Orwell
Comment
-
No updates really.
BJones was declared OUT during game for hamstring.
Matthews declared QUESTIONABLE for thumb.
Francois declared DOUBTFUL with ankle.
Perry came back.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
the more i think about this, the more i agreeOriginally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostBad call. Right foot may have (perhaps even likely) been on the ground when he caught the ball. I could see it being ruled incomplete if that's the call on the field. It wasn't, and there shouldn't have been enough evidence to overturn it.
when it first happened, i was watching the right foot come back down and i though incomplete. but after seeing the replay, it looks like the right toe was touching when he caught the ball
you could not tell for sure, so since it was ruled a catch on the field it shouldn't have been overturned IMO
Comment
-
I thought the game was a big nothingburger. I'm glad they won, they needed to get to 2-2. But they didn't prove they are better than the Lions.
Packers have a running game, and they mostly shut-down the Lions running game.
My guess is the Packer secondary played well. But missing Johnson & Burleson is similar to the Packers playing without Nelson and Finley.
Comment
-
That was a catch as seen on slo mo. Jones got a big dick in the butt, and he looked it on the bench.Originally posted by red View Postit looks like the right toe was touching when he caught the ball
you could not tell for sure, so since it was ruled a catch on the field it shouldn't have been overturned IMO
Comment


Comment