Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Vikings Week Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 9
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 template Next
  • #31
    Jennings can talk, but last I checked he didn't even play and is still gimpy. He's not exactly setting the league on fire this year.
    Also:


    Let him talk...maybe it will be extra motivation for the secondary to actually show up.

    Comment

    • #32
      Don't know how I missed this:

      Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 17m
      Played three snaps vs. #NYG. RT @bdonny13: Any word on if Sherrod will play this week against the Vikings?
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment

      • #33
        They said after the game that Sherrod was put in on a few special teams plays, to give him the feel of live action.

        Comment

        • #34
          Originally posted by Patler View Post
          They said after the game that Sherrod was put in on a few special teams plays, to give him the feel of live action.
          A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step...

          Comment

          • #35
            Originally posted by woodbuck27 View Post
            There you go mixing in with two separate posted issues:

            a) The Packers schedule over the next two weeks and need or not to win:

            b) A comment on recent strength issues with the Green Bay Packers and a Greg Jennings comment related to that. A comment that might 'only' 'FIRE UP' the misery that I see in a remaining healthy defensive roster. The bad karma that Greg Jennings comment might possible instill with any Packer players with a sense of real pride reading Greg Jennings comment.

            That such a comment 'might' bring BAD KARMA upon the Minnesota Vikings in terms of a negative outcome for that game with the Packers this week (or week 12 of the NFL schedule).


            I'll stick to my position and maybe that will be the end of it:

            RE: a)

            I`m clearly saying that we must defeat the Vikings this week and then go into Detroit and win that game in week 13 as well. If we do so, we`ll be `most likely` tied with Detroit with a 7-5 record and get an edge over them in any tie break as it would stand to the end of week 13.

            All that not considering what the Chicago Bears (6-5) will have done over the next two weeks....at St. Louis this week and at Minny in week 13.

            We must win this week and we must win the following week in Detroit.

            RE: b)

            My comment on Greg Jennings comment and how that relates to bad karma is in direct reference to Greg Jennings comment and....

            Not to you Pugger.

            PACKERS !
            Oh, I missed that.

            Comment

            • #36
              Unleash the Tolzien against the Vikes the first half. They have a TERRIBLE secondary, just wretched. Then with the three TD lead in the 3rd stamp us mail on Lacy and Starks butts are run them over.

              This should be an easy win.
              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

              Comment

              • #37
                If Tolzien doesn't turn the ball over I like our chances. The queens run D isn't nearly as good as the Gmen either.

                Comment

                • #38
                  And Ponder is getting the start! Sweet.
                  Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                    And Ponder is getting the start! Sweet.

                    Whatever happened to Josh Freeman? Surely he has some grasp of their offense by now?
                    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                    KYPack

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                      Whatever happened to Josh Freeman? Surely he has some grasp of their offense by now?
                      He couldn't make it, he had to stay home and take care of his pets



                      Wow, that photo is at least as bad as the Sanchez GQ cover.

                      Seriously though, I've seen at least one article saying they're possibly not starting him because they know what they have and don't want other teams to see it and drive up his price in FA at the end of the year!
                      --
                      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                        Whatever happened to Josh Freeman? Surely he has some grasp of their offense by now?
                        I think they are truly scared of Freeman. There's not having a grasp of an offense and there's missing guys by 10-15 yards because one is inaccurate. He was far more the latter. Learning the playbook is so overrated in this case. Freeman wasn't some rookie who got put into action, he was a starter for the last 4 years. Don't buy the hype that they don't want his price to go up, he's just that bad right now.
                        All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          Well Paul Allen from KFAN is expecting Freeman to start at home against the Bears or never start again for the Vikes.
                          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            In the end the key to the game really is scoring more points than the Vikings...if we do that we should win
                            Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              Yep, Frazier said Ponder will get the start. Wow...expected it to be Freeman. He must not be picking things up or showing anything in practice.
                              Who's better: Tolzien or Ponder?

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                Oh now it looks like AP might miss the game...
                                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 template Next
                                Working...
                                X