Are The Packers Actually Better Set Up To Play a 4-3?

[KYPack]

We need all 3 of those pieces no matter what scheme is run.

Agreed.

What I was trying to say is that we have to add is a tough job, 3 new effective players.

Switching to a 4-3 might require 5-6 new guys, a virtually impossible job.

[Zool]

Agreed.

What I was trying to say is that we have to add is a tough job, 3 new effective players.

Switching to a 4-3 might require 5-6 new guys, a virtually impossible job.

Good point. I'm actually wanting a FA safety for the first time in a while. These rookies and 2nd year guys are apparently all morons.

[red]

No.

Are the Packers better set up to play Man or Zone coverage?

well, it sure looks like its every man for himself in the secondary

so maybe man?

if you're gonna run zone you can't leave 20 yard wide spaces where no one covers anything, and we've seen that problem since 2011