Who would you rather have? Porter or Branch?

[Partial]

What's with the Porter love? What has he done ever? Nothing. Branch has put up good numbers without the aid of a Randy Moss or a Tim Brown next to him.

[PackerPro42]

I would take Branch because he has already proven himself in high pressure games( the Super Bowl) and has even been the Super Bowl MVP. Plus I think he would fit in better in GB anyways.

[Partial]

I would take Branch because he has already proven himself in high pressure games( the Super Bowl) and has even been the Super Bowl MVP. Plus I think he would fit in better in GB anyways.

That and he is infinitely better.

[HarveyWallbangers]

Porter probably has more ability, but Branch is a better football player. I'd take Branch.

[Bretsky]

What's with the Porter love? What has he done ever? Nothing. Branch has put up good numbers without the aid of a Randy Moss or a Tim Brown next to him.

This is an easy one; because he has more talent and our homerism leads us to believe we can bring the best out in every player.

I voted for Porter.

Truth be told, knowing we have Driver and Jennings Branch may be the best fit to this squad.

But I'd still love the upside of Favre to Porter.

Cheers,
B

[the_idle_threat]

I don't like either of them, but I voted Porter because at least he'd fit in the WCO.

[woodbuck27]

well i don't want either one, but if i had to pick it would be porter

he's bigger

we just cut a pretty damn good wr that was aroung 5'9 because we said he was too small, even though he did everything we asked of him

Antonneeoooo....

[PackerPro42]

I read on SI.com that the Patriots want two first round picks for Branch.

[Partial]

I read on SI.com that the Patriots want two first round picks for Branch.

Ha! They might get a 3rd. He isn't going anywhere.