Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The new formula to win in the NFL

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #16
    Originally posted by pbmax View Post
    You give me that defense and I will happily sign off on the run first run game with Wilson or better at QB.
    With that run game the D stays off the field and the other teams O has trouble getting a rhythm. I can do this all day.
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

    Comment

    • #17
      Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
      With that run game the D stays off the field and the other teams O has trouble getting a rhythm. I can do this all day.
      Here is what we need. The epiphany hit sometime between Philly's first game of 138 plays and their playoff elimination. TOP is, maybe, a second order of importance. I think number of plays is more important. Specifically, a lot of plays run in a short time frame might be ideal.

      We need a way to track that. Because Philly's D thrived later in the season overall.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment

      • #18
        Interesting. I like having TOP on the Packers' side, but it didn't do them any damn good in that game against, who was that - Philly? - when Tolzien kept the offense on the field for ridiculous amounts of time, but the well-rested Packer defense couldn't hold its own dick.
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment

        • #19
          I prefer the tried and tested method for winning: scoring more points than the other team
          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

          Comment

          Previous 1 2 template Next
          Working...
          X