Hayward - does this raise or lower concerns about hsi health?

[Cheesehead Craig]

WR. Could see a high draft pick push Boykin.

There's no WR in this draft that's going to start over what we currently have at WR.

ILB

Not Hawk, he's too entrenched. I could see a 3rd round pick being good enough at the other ILB spot.

Or TE. TT is gonna draft a WR or two, or a WR and TE. People on Packerrats are going to freak out when he doesn't draft a safety at 21!

Maybe here too. But I won't freak out if they don't take a S at 21.

So I stand corrected that it's possible to get a starter other than S with a pick that would be used to trade up to get a S (I'm thinking 3rd round).

[Zool]

There's no WR in this draft that's going to start over what we currently have at WR.


Not Hawk, he's too entrenched. I could see a 3rd round pick being good enough at the other ILB spot.


Maybe here too. But I won't freak out if they don't take a S at 21.

So I stand corrected that it's possible to get a starter other than S with a pick that would be used to trade up to get a S (I'm thinking 3rd round).

I agree if you end the first 2 with "at our draft position". If Sammy Watkins is available at 21 I'm pretty sure he'd overtake Boykin. I'd take Bell over Hawk or Jones, or possibly both and switch to a 4-3.

[Brandon494]

There's no WR in this draft that's going to start over what we currently have at WR.


Not Hawk, he's too entrenched. I could see a 3rd round pick being good enough at the other ILB spot.


Maybe here too. But I won't freak out if they don't take a S at 21.

So I stand corrected that it's possible to get a starter other than S with a pick that would be used to trade up to get a S (I'm thinking 3rd round).

1. We still need depth at WR and whos to say a rookie can't come in and win the starting #3 job and/or return duties especially in this deep draft class?

2. I never mentioned Hawk's name but you do realize we have two starting ILBs. Hawk and Jones need to be replaced but you are right it won't happen this season for Hawk.

3. If Haha or Pryor are available at 21 and we pass on either one I will freak out.

[Cheesehead Craig]

1. We still need depth at WR and whos to say a rookie can't come in and win the starting #3 job and/or return duties especially in this deep draft class?

2. I never mentioned Hawk's name but you do realize we have two starting ILBs. Hawk and Jones need to be replaced but you are right it won't happen this season for Hawk.

3. If Haha or Pryor are available at 21 and we pass on either one I will freak out.

The whole conversation was about a starter. PB mentioned that a draft pick WR could come in and start. Not talking about depth or a #3 WR.

I am aware we have 2 ILB, just noted that Hawk is not the one going to be replaced first.

I may agree with you on pt 3. But I don't think they will be there.

[pbmax]

The whole conversation was about a starter. PB mentioned that a draft pick WR could come in and start. Not talking about depth or a #3 WR.

I am aware we have 2 ILB, just noted that Hawk is not the one going to be replaced first.

I may agree with you on pt 3. But I don't think they will be there.

No, I mean start as a #3, since 3 wide might be the most common Packer O alignment. Essentially take Boykins job.

I love the guy, but it would not be unheard of for a talent such as his to be passed by a hot rookie. Packers O is tough to learn, but as #3 and not a slot WR, he would need to learn only one position.

[smuggler]

#3 WR is a starter in this offense.