Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was the last CBA really so bad for the players?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Was the last CBA really so bad for the players?

    A lot has been made of the players being taken to the cleaners by the owners in the last CBA, in part because from a highest ever salary cap of $127.997 million in 2009, the subsequent caps have been:

    2011 - $120.375 million
    2012 - $120.6 million
    2013 - $123 million.

    But now, 2014 has been set at $133 million, and internally the league offices are said to be projecting that 2015 will exceed $140 million and in 2016 it will surpass $150 million.

    Looks like the spigot leading to the players' money trough has been re-opened.

  • #2
    Promising news for re-signing Cobb/Nelson.
    I think this will result in a new round of record QB contracts and do little to help most free agents and RBs. The vet minimum will continue to be commonly offered.

    Comment


    • #3
      When a pathetic excuse for a football player like Marshmallow Outhouse can make 2.6 million in four years of soul-killing horrible play (1.3 mil in 2013 alone), the players have nothing to complain about...except that a worthless hunk of meat like Outhouse is grossly overpaid. The hotdog vendor should get more - at least that guy keeps a player like Ezra Johnson happy in the preseason.
      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by run pMc View Post
        Promising news for re-signing Cobb/Nelson.
        I think this will result in a new round of record QB contracts and do little to help most free agents and RBs. The vet minimum will continue to be commonly offered.

        More likely it will create general dissatisfaction and hold-outs, as guys getting contracts now will dramatically top contracts of far better players signed in the last year or two!
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
          When a pathetic excuse for a football player like Marshmallow Outhouse can make 2.6 million in four years of soul-killing horrible play (1.3 mil in 2013 alone), the players have nothing to complain about...except that a worthless hunk of meat like Outhouse is grossly overpaid. The hotdog vendor should get more - at least that guy keeps a player like Ezra Johnson happy in the preseason.
          Newhouse received the significant bump in 2013 income due to achieving playing time requirements in 2011 and 2012. Like it or not, he was the starter during those years, and logged a heck of a lot of playing time. Perhaps he wasn't as good as fans wanted, but apparently during those years he was better than any alternatives on the roster.

          He filled the job and was paid because of it.

          Comment


          • #6
            It's certainly a lot worse for players on rookie contracts. I think its underestimated what contrast of an always cheap 5 year contract in the first round does to the market for NFL talent as well. By that I mean when a top 5 pick represented a very significant risk, free agency looked a LOT more attractive as a way to gather high profile talent.
            70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Patler View Post
              A lot has been made of the players being taken to the cleaners by the owners in the last CBA.....
              Those poor dears. Where are the cleaners located - Zurich or Dubai?

              Comment


              • #8
                The money is there in the new contract, but I still think D Smith did a shit job for the players in one aspect. The NFLPA failed to rid themselves of the tags. That was the big line in the sand, the tags were going to be history. When it got down to the settling of the deal, Smith fell on his sword and BOTH tags survived in the new deal. In fact, the transition tag was used several times this off-season. That was a point that could have been compromised and the owner totally got their way on that one.

                This negotiation had a weird focus, too. Both the owners and the players united on getting the "windfall rookie" contract eliminated. Those crazy rookie deals were bullshit, but I think the NFLPA mgt team focused way too much on them. It looks like the pendulum swung too much the other way and now you have 2nd and 3rd year players that are way underpaid in their deals.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Previous CBA: 52.? % of Total Revenues
                  Current CBA: 47-48% of Total Revenues

                  Cleaners, meet the players.

                  The totals mean nothing. Their percentage of the increased revenue is the important marker. You could say this: I do believe they went to a tiered system to determine which revenues would count toward calculation, so the bigger TV deals could swing the percentage higher. However, it was designed to keep the player revenue total below 49% for the life of the deal.

                  Feel sorry for them? Nope.

                  Did they get routed? Yep.

                  Especially after the concussion settlement, at worst, was in line with some estimates and at its best, beat most estimates of cost.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                    The money is there in the new contract, but I still think D Smith did a shit job for the players in one aspect. The NFLPA failed to rid themselves of the tags. That was the big line in the sand, the tags were going to be history. When it got down to the settling of the deal, Smith fell on his sword and BOTH tags survived in the new deal. In fact, the transition tag was used several times this off-season. That was a point that could have been compromised and the owner totally got their way on that one.

                    This negotiation had a weird focus, too. Both the owners and the players united on getting the "windfall rookie" contract eliminated. Those crazy rookie deals were bullshit, but I think the NFLPA mgt team focused way too much on them. It looks like the pendulum swung too much the other way and now you have 2nd and 3rd year players that are way underpaid in their deals.
                    That was the part that would gall me as a player. Other than less workouts and padded practices, they got little in return. Goodell still has no independent review of his Personal Conduct Polucy decisions either. I would be surprised if Smith survives.
                    Last edited by pbmax; 03-20-2014, 10:10 AM.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kiwon View Post
                      Those poor dears. Where are the cleaners located - Zurich or Dubai?
                      Hilarious.
                      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                        Previous CBA: 52.? % of Total Revenues
                        Current CBA: 47-48% of Total Revenues

                        Cleaners, meet the players.

                        The totals mean nothing. Their percentage of the increased revenue is the important marker. You could say this: I do believe they went to a tiered system to determine which revenues would count toward calculation, so the bigger TV deals could swing the percentage higher. However, it was designed to keep the player revenue total below 49% for the life of the deal.

                        Feel sorry for them? Nope.

                        Did they get routed? Yep.

                        Especially after the concussion settlement, at worst, was in line with some estimates and at its best, beat most estimates of cost.
                        The union did what a union does. They represented their own survival. They got a few meaningless concessions like less offseason mandatory (allowable) work. Less contact in practices. They tried to sell a loss as a win, and survived to collect more player wages.
                        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          That was the part that would gall me as a player. Other than less workouts and padded practices, they got little in return. Goodell still has no independent review of his Personal Conduct Polucy decisions either. I would be surprised if Smith survives.
                          Hmmm...should have read one post farther.
                          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            There is another aspect that is still playing out. Some of these guys are now going into their 3rd year with the new deal. They are teammates with guys that helped hose them with the smaller rookie deals. Admittedly, a guy like Sam Bradford got crazy money with the last of the rookie windfall deals. But some guys now have to play 3 and 4 years to get the money commensurate with their production.

                            There has to be some animosity towards the vet players that really helped the ownership sell them down the old river. The old rookie deals had to go, but the new method is just as goofy in the other direction.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                              There is another aspect that is still playing out. Some of these guys are now going into their 3rd year with the new deal. They are teammates with guys that helped hose them with the smaller rookie deals. Admittedly, a guy like Sam Bradford got crazy money with the last of the rookie windfall deals. But some guys now have to play 3 and 4 years to get the money commensurate with their production.

                              There has to be some animosity towards the vet players that really helped the ownership sell them down the old river. The old rookie deals had to go, but the new method is just as goofy in the other direction.
                              In that regard, it's no different than what's happened with a lot of unions the past twenty years: sell out the younger workers at the insistence of ownership, which holds all the cards these days and demands "savings."

                              The zeitgeist of this country right now is such that unions have no cards to play, and ownership holds all the trump cards.

                              See Irsay, Jim, regarding what Goodell won't do about his recent arrest. That's just one example.
                              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                              KYPack

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X