Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packer Playcalling Balance

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • #31
    Originally posted by Smeefers View Post
    I went with passing more, but that's only because we have the best QB in the league at the moment. If they're giving you 5 yards a pop, you run it down their throat until they try and stop you. It's all situational. Very difficult to lobby for one way or the other because it's never black and white. I hate the 3 & 1 pass, but if they cheat up on it, it would be stupid not to throw it over their heads.
    /thread

    This about sums it up. You take what the defense gives you which means you must run and pass effectively.
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

    Comment

    • #32
      Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
      I would title it "bad pass blocking to .500"
      Or the Tolzein/Seneca experiment
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      This is museum quality stupidity.

      Comment

      • #33
        I dunno.

        Punt less, score more?

        Comment

        • #34
          Originally posted by KYPack View Post
          I dunno.

          Punt less, score more?
          Legit!
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment

          • #35
            Anyone have a breakdown of power running plays vs "student body right, middle, left", i.e. ZBS??

            I missed a lot of the season, but what I did watch near the end of the season I noticed more power running plays than I can ever remember MM running. Saw a lot more pulling and trapping, which is what I've been screaming for forever. I assume the increased use of power blocking, in great measure, is what was responsible for our improved showing in the run game??

            Lacy was a big boost too, but from what I saw Starks was just as effective, and Franklin had a big game before he got hurt as well... so I attribute most of the improvement to the playcalling and the OL.
            wist

            Comment

            • #36
              I don't have a run down, but there was a noticeable increase in power running plays. Not to say they abandoned the zbs. Lacey and Starks both seem capable with zb, being primarily one cut backs.
              - Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.

              Comment

              • #37
                Lacy got the power O plays. Starks was running ZBS. It was beautiful.

                Don't remember what Franklin was running versus Cincy.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment

                • #38
                  Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                  Nothing like rigging the result by the wording of the poll hahahaha.

                  Let other teams run first. The Packers have possibly the greatest throwing QB in the history of the NFL. I'm so thankful that McCarthy has chosen to pass first. That should NOT change now just because we have Lacy and a couple of other excellent RBs. We still should use the running game as a change of pace and to run clock if we have a big lead late.

                  It's like the Glorious Multiplier!
                  "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                  Comment

                  Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                  Working...
                  X