Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Cleft Crusty Challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
    Packers- Rodgers is in his prime and top 3 QB in the league.
    Panthers- Cam is younger, better passer, and just as good of a runner.
    Seahawks- Russel Wilson has the make up to be the next Drew Brees and hes also mobile.
    Falcons- Matt Ryan is in his prime and one of the most accurate QBs in the game.
    Lions- Matthew Stafford same age and a better passer, has shown he can put up big numbers in this league.
    Colts- Andrew Luck has the same value as player but Indy isn't going to get rid of a white QB for a black guy with tattoos, the fans in Indiana would riot
    Steelers- Big Ben is a proven winner and still in his prime after just turning 32.
    Eagles- Nick Foles, would still like to see more of him after NFL defense coordinators figure out Kelly's offense but he threw 27 TDs with only 2 INTs last season in 13 games.

    Yes if I had to take a QB to build my team around I'm taking Kap over Manning, Brady, Brees, and Romo who all might be out of the league in 3 years. RGIII might be a better player but hes injury prone and Johnny Football still has to play a game even though I think he'll be a star in the league.
    Stafford is actually younger by a couple of months, but was born in a different year so likely would've started school a year after Kaepernick, yet was drafted 2 years sooner. Stafford graduated from high school early so they both started college the same year, but Kaepernick redshirted and Stafford started as a true freshman. Stafford went on to play 3 years, Kaepernick 4.
    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by pbmax View Post
      Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 2h
      Examine Kaepernick’s leverage going into talks: 1 year left, so wasn’t leaving. And how many teams would he start for? 6? Where would he go?
      Rapoport just got added to my moron list. As an FA without compensation after next season, there is a long list of teams that would look at him. I'd say the following would be in a position both with a QB need, and, importantly, without a large financial commitment to one:

      Cleveland (of course...)
      St-L
      Buffalo
      Oakland
      Minnesota
      NYJ
      Cincy - still haven't extended Dalton
      Miami - maybe not, Tannehill had a good season last year
      Houston
      KC - Smith entering his last year, no extension so far (wouldn't that have been awesome???)
      TB - rumour is they tried to move the incumbent, Glennon, during the draft
      Arizona - the last year of Palmer's contract voids after next season (don't understand that...)

      I'd add Denver as a possibility - Manning could well retire if he were to win an SB this coming year.

      I didn't add Jax because I think they'd give Bortles a couple of years regardless. You could argue the same about the other two teams with first round QBs from the last draft, but that still leaves 10 teams that could well have been in a position to take a run at Kaepernick if he'd entered FA.
      --
      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Guiness View Post
        Stafford is actually younger by a couple of months, but was born in a different year so likely would've started school a year after Kaepernick, yet was drafted 2 years sooner. Stafford graduated from high school early so they both started college the same year, but Kaepernick redshirted and Stafford started as a true freshman. Stafford went on to play 3 years, Kaepernick 4.
        LMAO they both are 26.

        Comment


        • #19
          I like Kaepernick. I see him as head and shoulders better than Griffin and Wilson, and slightly better than Newton.

          The money being equal, the only ones I'd take over him are Aaron Rodgers and ....... I guess that's it. If you disregard age, the Brees. Peyton, and Brady, but no others.

          Just the same, the question was, what would various teams do? And as somebody said, a lot of people prefer to stick with their own.
          What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
            I like Kaepernick. I see him as head and shoulders better than Griffin and Wilson, and slightly better than Newton.

            The money being equal, the only ones I'd take over him are Aaron Rodgers and ....... I guess that's it. If you disregard age, the Brees. Peyton, and Brady, but no others.

            Just the same, the question was, what would various teams do? And as somebody said, a lot of people prefer to stick with their own.
            please explain how kapernick is head and shoulders over wilson? other then height

            wilson has won more including the big game, he has a higher completion percentage, higher QBR. thrown for more TD's. rushed for more yards, thrown for more yards

            its hard to find any field where kapernick actually performs better then wilson. how he can be head and shoulders better then wilson is fucking insane.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
              Packers- Rodgers is in his prime and top 3 QB in the league.
              Panthers- Cam is younger, better passer, and just as good of a runner.
              Seahawks- Russel Wilson has the make up to be the next Drew Brees and hes also mobile.
              Falcons- Matt Ryan is in his prime and one of the most accurate QBs in the game.
              Lions- Matthew Stafford same age and a better passer, has shown he can put up big numbers in this league.
              Colts- Andrew Luck has the same value as player but Indy isn't going to get rid of a white QB for a black guy with tattoos, the fans in Indiana would riot
              Steelers- Big Ben is a proven winner and still in his prime after just turning 32.
              Eagles- Nick Foles, would still like to see more of him after NFL defense coordinators figure out Kelly's offense but he threw 27 TDs with only 2 INTs last season in 13 games.
              This is a pretty good start. But the answer isn't who WOULD take Kap, but who SHOULD. That means that the Falcons, Steelers and YES, the Lions should take him. (I think Mike Tomlin would take Kap for Ben in a nanosecond). Sure Stifford has put up lots of numbers, but his mechanics have degraded so bad that Kap on his bad days is throwing better. Matt Ryan is in his prime, but he's prime chuck, and you'd take the filet mignon.

              Despite the racist remark about Luck, there's no way Indy would give him up.

              Eagles are a tough one - Kelley might salivate at the prospect of a dynamic guy like Kap, but he might see him as a young Michael Vick without the dog killings.

              Kap will very likely get more accurate, understand the game better, and become a top 5 QB.

              Was glad to see most people realized that NE, Denver, N.O. would take the young guy.

              The shocker might be Green Bay - given Rodgers' concussion history, Stubby might be tempted to take Kap, thinking that if he could cure Rodgers of Tedford programming, he could certainly clean up Kap's game - and then stick it to SF.

              Alas, these are the sort of pointless offseason speculations that keep fans from being more efficient at work...

              Comment


              • #22
                So, if this is forever, not a one year deal then we are disregarding age.

                My list of guys I would rather have than Kapernick: Rodgers, Brees, Brady, Manning, Rivers, Dalton, Rapistburger, Luck

                Guys who are basically a push: Stafford, Ryan, Eli, Newton, Wilson, Foles, Cutler

                Guys you could argue are a push: RGIII, Tannehill, Flacco, Romo

                So he is not clearly better than 20 of the 32 QB's in the league. He is clearly inferior to 8 by my list. Equal to 8 more. That fits with my impression that he is an average NFL starting QB. Nothing wrong with that, but I think he got paid a bit much. At first glance, if he went FA, I think 10 teams would clearly want to make a play for him...of course it only takes 2.

                edit: had dalton in the push and better list by mistake so my numbers are off a tad.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
                  The shocker might be Green Bay - given Rodgers' concussion history, Stubby might be tempted to take Kap, thinking that if he could cure Rodgers of Tedford programming, he could certainly clean up Kap's game - and then stick it to SF.
                  I don't see that at ALL, I could see the other three teams you mentioned though.

                  IMO if you asked teams right now what QB would they pick to build their team around for the future I'm sure Rodgers would be the #1 name mentioned.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                    So, if this is forever, not a one year deal then we are disregarding age.
                    No, the idea is that the move is for good. For example, Manning out of Denver, Kap in - for good. Elway would take that deal without having to think twice about it. Not, who would you take in their prime, especially since very likely we have yet to see Kaepernick in his prime.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Brandon494 View Post
                      I don't see that at ALL.
                      I understand. The thinking is that internally the Packers could be very worried about Rodger's durability. That's the wild card there.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
                        I understand. The thinking is that internally the Packers could be very worried about Rodger's durability. That's the wild card there.
                        True hes not Favre when it comes to durability but hes no Mike Vick either.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Cleft Crusty View Post
                          I understand. The thinking is that internally the Packers could be very worried about Rodger's durability. That's the wild card there.
                          I don't see that at all. If they were truly worried about his durablity, they wouldn't a) have an oline that is average at best, b) continue to change the Oline on an annual basis. Regardless of the above, he really hasn't had any durability issues. He has has very few games missed and you can't hold the two Bears pouncing on him against AR.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Just Jeff View Post
                            I don't see that at all. If they were truly worried about his durablity, they wouldn't a) have an oline that is average at best, b) continue to change the Oline on an annual basis. Regardless of the above, he really hasn't had any durability issues. He has has very few games missed and you can't hold the two Bears pouncing on him against AR.
                            I can't speak for Cleft Crusty, but I think the Packers have tried (mostly unsuccessfully) to build a line to protect Rodgers. And clearly drafting Lacey and re-signing the Stark Plug indicate they are very serious about running the ball - which I'm pretty sure they've been clear is to keep the heat off Rodgers. Of course that's all good for the passing game, regardless of the simple fact that one more hit to the 'ol cabeza could put Rodgers out permanently. While that's true of all QBs, those who have had multiple concussions are clearly at greater risk of ending their careers - and in the current NFL environment - having extended bench time for head injury evaluation.
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Just Jeff View Post
                              I don't see that at all. If they were truly worried about his durablity, they wouldn't a) have an oline that is average at best, b) continue to change the Oline on an annual basis. Regardless of the above, he really hasn't had any durability issues. He has has very few games missed and you can't hold the two Bears pouncing on him against AR.
                              wistian, that is.

                              Ted also doesn't think the ILBs need improving because they are average at best. He also was never really interested in a running game and his hand was forced by Lacy failing to get picked. And he doesn't like blocking because he doesn't keep blocking TEs on the roster.

                              Mind reading is fun.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                i wouldn't put new england on that list. we all know how hoody works. brady's getting a bit old. he'd let him go for kap.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X