Washington'g NFL team continues to troll

[Guiness]

enlighten us. Spell it out.

Too good calling me PC! LOL!

Can't believe I'm doing this, but in case some of you don't see how publishing that photo could cause some people to get upset (I highly doubt this, I might add) the team sanctioned publishing of a picture of a Redskinette dressed as a squaw is going to stoke the fire that's already started there. Not that they seem to care.

[KYPack]

I'm with Mad.

These chickies are dressed for a polar expedition.

Let's get a little skin workin' here.

[Just Jeff]

I understand that arabs might be offended by this but if you're going to wear short short, you got to have camel toe.

[mraynrand]

Too good calling me PC! LOL!

Can't believe I'm doing this, but in case some of you don't see how publishing that photo could cause some people to get upset (I highly doubt this, I might add) the team sanctioned publishing of a picture of a Redskinette dressed as a squaw is going to stoke the fire that's already started there. Not that they seem to care.

I didn't call you PC.

How is a cheerleader dressed as a squaw offensive?

[Guiness]

I didn't call you PC.

How is a cheerleader dressed as a squaw offensive?

Christ you can be a bastard!

True enough, you didn't (directly), but the topic was raised and I'd submit that you inferred it. In a fashion that gives you plausible deniability and continue the argument, of course.

Regardless, I just find this amusing. Mostly I believe that it's impossible the person posting the picture did not know it would be inflammatory, and did so despite, or perhaps because of, that.

[wist43]

Too good calling me PC! LOL!

Can't believe I'm doing this, but in case some of you don't see how publishing that photo could cause some people to get upset (I highly doubt this, I might add) the team sanctioned publishing of a picture of a Redskinette dressed as a squaw is going to stoke the fire that's already started there. Not that they seem to care.

You're the one who brought it up... why would you bring it up, unless you are PC offended??

First thing I thought was - the chick in the squaw outfit is smokin hot.
Second thought?? - the asian chicks are entirely hittable.
Third thought?? - the black chick on the left is okay.
Fourth thought?? - the chick in yellow is thick and muggly.

Your first thought?? 'Someone will get their panties in a twist'?? WTF?? Are you gay??

[mraynrand]

Christ you can be a bastard!

True enough, you didn't (directly), but the topic was raised and I'd submit that you inferred it. In a fashion that gives you plausible deniability and continue the argument, of course.

Regardless, I just find this amusing. Mostly I believe that it's impossible the person posting the picture did not know it would be inflammatory, and did so despite, or perhaps because of, that.

I didn't imply a damn thing. I wanted someone who posted this to explain what is offensive.

Perhaps the point that is being made by the person who posted this is to illustrate how non-offensive it is (any more than cowboy cheerleaders, for example), unless you find scantily-clad women offensive.

This is manufactured inflammation, by the ruling Left class that needs people to be continually inflamed, to distract from what they're doing and to keep the people constantly agitated. We have always been at war with Oceana.

For something like the squaw outfit to be offensive, someone had to manufacture outrage, because there is nothing inherently offensive about Indian/Native American outfits, and there is no intent here to denigrate anyone.

You (leftists, not Guiness) don't get to decide what is outrageous! You are NOT a God!

[Freak Out]

lol.

[Guiness]

I didn't imply a damn thing. I wanted someone who posted this to explain what is offensive.

Perhaps the point that is being made by the person who posted this is to illustrate how non-offensive it is (any more than cowboy cheerleaders, for example), unless you find scantily-clad women offensive.

This is manufactured inflammation, by the ruling Left class that needs people to be continually inflamed, to distract from what they're doing and to keep the people constantly agitated. We have always been at war with Oceana.

For something like the squaw outfit to be offensive, someone had to manufacture outrage, because there is nothing inherently offensive about Indian/Native American outfits, and there is no intent here to denigrate anyone.

You (leftists, not Guiness) don't get to decide what is outrageous! You are NOT a God!

I didn't say offensive, I said they were trolling. That's the major point I was trying to get across, the Redskins posted this despite (or perhaps, because) knowing it was inflammatory, hence my 'trolling' remark.

[HowardRoark]

Isn't it a historical (the 50 years) visualization of the team's cheerleaders?

Now they have to whitewash their history too?

I see it as a dramatic visual of how they heve become more enlightened over time. I can't wait to see next year......

[Tony Oday]

I still think they should rename the team the Whiteskins. I mean White is the only color on HMDA information on credit applications so f it lets embrace our whiteness and have a team. It could be an insurance salesman, father of three, little overweight, depressed suburb guy as the mascot State Farm would get the naming rights on the field. Also the team has to start with 2 wins per year because hell we are white and we have white privilege so its just like our "being white male" check we get every month...

[wist43]

I didn't say offensive, I said they were trolling. That's the major point I was trying to get across, the Redskins posted this despite (or perhaps, because) knowing it was inflammatory, hence my 'trolling' remark.

It's only inflammatory to pantywaste pussies... so why even bring it up??

[mraynrand]

Isn't it a historical (the 50 years) visualization of the team's cheerleaders?

Now they have to whitewash their history too?

I see it as a dramatic visual of how they heve become more enlightened over time. I can't wait to see next year......

Not much left to the imagination

[mraynrand]

I didn't say offensive, I said they were trolling. That's the major point I was trying to get across, the Redskins posted this despite (or perhaps, because) knowing it was inflammatory, hence my 'trolling' remark.

anger, offend - sorry I can't keep it straight

[MadtownPacker]

Keep that politics shit out of this Aynrand or join your fallen brothers. Final warning.