Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BRETSKY ALERT: Jim Leonard Talking to Packers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BRETSKY ALERT: Jim Leonard Talking to Packers



    Sure, he is also talking to other teams, and the Packers might have sent his call to the ticket office, but the important thing is that they are talking.

    “It would mean a lot, but we’ve had a lot of conversations with teams, Green Bay being one of them,” Leonhard said, via CheeseheadTV.com. “They’re a great organization, I’d love to play for them but it hasn’t worked out up to now. You never know what can happen in the future, but we’ll see. They’re a great organization and it’s always fun to see the fans and have a lot of family that follows them closely.”
    I think this is maybe just the agent trying to hurry up a decision somewhere about getting a deal for camp, but the thought is nice.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  • #2


    He just looks gritty.

    Picture is actual size.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #3
      Jim Leonard Talking to Packers....

      Does this mean he keeps calling an answering machine and leaving a message?
      Is he calling the equipment manager looking for a job?
      Maybe wants tickets to a regular season game?

      We have no use for him on this team.

      Comment


      • #4
        Adding a tough, experienced safety - for the minimum - to a young inexperienced safety group already 25% head-fused-to-body seems like a rather prudent move to me.
        By the way : 'ALERT"???? This is already kinda old news.
        Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

        Comment


        • #5
          They must be looking for a way to make Abredderis appear less tiny.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hmmm, did we ever fill Franklin's roster spot?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by The Shadow View Post
              Adding a tough, experienced safety - for the minimum - to a young inexperienced safety group already 25% head-fused-to-body seems like a rather prudent move to me.
              By the way : 'ALERT"???? This is already kinda old news.
              It is also worth noting that he can return punts. Would be nice to have another option before having to use Cobb. I wouldn't mind taking a punt on him for cheap.

              Comment


              • #8
                “It would mean a lot, but we’ve had a lot of conversations with teams, Green Bay being one of them,”

                translation: his agent called up the Packers and they said they were not interested at this time but they would keep him in mind.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The thread kind of woke Bretsky up ........but.........Nothing short of a signing would get me excited about this rumor; gotta give Brandon kudos here and call a spade a spade. TT has no interest.

                  I sat by a close friend of Jim Leonard's father at Badger games last year. Dude sounded very credible.

                  Jim Leonard called up the Packers many years ago, per his father, when he was much younger and a much better player. TT had no interest in bringing him in or even talking numbers.

                  If he was with us last year heck he may have been our 2nd best safety. But upside is limited.

                  You get a smart football player who can teach the younger ones and lead by example on the team. TT takes the youthful talent with long term developmental upside over that every day

                  Not saying either is right or wrong. But TT won't bring him in.
                  TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Which one is not a Packer Safety?

                    (Height, Weight, 40 time)

                    Player #1 6'1" 209 4.51
                    Player #2 5'10" 207 4.5
                    Player #3 6'2" 216 4.43
                    Player #4 5'8" 188 4.63
                    Player#5 6'1" 208 4.50

                    Of course, this is no indication of ability, but does indicate a trend.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                      Which one is not a Packer Safety?

                      (Height, Weight, 40 time)

                      Player #1 6'1" 209 4.51 Morgan Burnett
                      Player #2 5'10" 207 4.5 Chris Banjo
                      Player #3 6'2" 216 4.43 Sean Richardson
                      Player #4 5'8" 188 4.63 Jim Leonhard
                      Player#5 6'1" 208 4.50 Ha Ha Dix

                      Of course, this is no indication of ability, but does indicate a trend.
                      Since nobody cares, I will answer my own question. You can now throw Micah Hyde in at 6'0", 197, and 4.56.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                        Since nobody cares, I will answer my own question. You can now throw Micah Hyde in at 6'0", 197, and 4.56.
                        we care, we care.

                        I figured the 5'8" guy was Leonhard. Remembered that he timed slow as well. Knew Richardson was the outlier at the other end of the scale.
                        --
                        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          We want a short, slow, old guy why again?
                          "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                          KYPack

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                            We want a short, slow, old guy why again?
                            If that is a trend, I better get my agent on the phone.
                            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                              We want a short, slow, old guy why again?
                              For team pictures. Much easier to get good depth of field with slower player.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X