Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official 2014 Packers Training Camp Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I just heard on ESPN Radio (John Clayton reporting) that JC Tretter has a significant knee injury and will be out a while. Not sure what that means, but paging Corey Linsley. Curious to know if Garth (don't call me Toby) Gerhart was taking any reps at Center in practice.

    Also, any news on Brad Jones injury?
    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

    Comment


    • Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 58m
      With Tretter out, Linsley has gotten the first rep at center. But #Packers also have had Sitton at center and Lane Taylor at left guard.

      I almost wonder if this is a typo or if it was Sitton not Lang getting reps.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Carolina_Packer View Post
        I just heard on ESPN Radio (John Clayton reporting) that JC Tretter has a significant knee injury and will be out a while. Not sure what that means, but paging Corey Linsley. Curious to know if Garth (don't call me Toby) Gerhart was taking any reps at Center in practice.

        Also, any news on Brad Jones injury?
        Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 32m
        McCarthy on injuries: Jones (quad) not ready for KC; Raji (biceps) surgery; Tretter (significant knee injury) will be multiple weeks.

        Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 28m
        McCarthy not worried "today" for Brad Jones' availability vs. Seattle.
        Last edited by pbmax; 08-24-2014, 02:37 PM.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by pbmax View Post
          Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 58m
          With Tretter out, Linsley has gotten the first rep at center. But #Packers also have had Sitton at center and Lane Taylor at left guard.

          I almost wonder if this is a typo or if it was Sitton not Lang getting reps.
          MM:

          On Lang/Sitton at guard... You have to always train three centers. That will never change. Since 2006, the guards have always been trained at center. You do so much shotgun. Playing in the stadium we'll be playing in Week 1; communication that goes on, guards a big part of that.
          Hard to say, but last year when EDS had to come out of a couple games, Lang played Center.
          I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
          While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
          But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
          They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

          Comment


          • Green Bay Packers ‏@packers 27m
            McCarthy: I thought Derek (Sherrod) got better. He took another step. I like the way he graded out. Some of our young guys improved.

            Green Bay Packers ‏@packers 28m
            McCarthy: Letroy Guion is getting better. He's getting close.

            Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 31m
            McCarthy says Raji is not a candidate for IR with the designation to return. Will have surgery soon, he says. #Packers

            Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 29m
            Guards always trained to play center, MM said. Both took reps at practice.

            Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 28m
            McCarthy not worried "today" for Brad Jones' availability vs. Seattle.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
              Plus, they aren't going to put a JAG on that list. They'll save that for a star player.
              Might be Tretter's home, eh?

              Comment


              • I wonder what the rotation will be at ILB without Brad Jones - obviously Lattimore and Barrington with Hawk, but beyond that, do we finally see Bradford there? Or a lot more of Hubbard (I think he played ILB last week), maybe the wet dream of us posters, Sean Richardson playing there?
                What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                Comment


                • Barrington, as he was in the previous two games, looks to be the #1 sub. Lattimore after him.

                  If an OLB moves, he will go to the end of the end of the depth chart. Offseason prep is 80% over.

                  Richardson isn't going to see ILB this year unless a boulder falls on the first string defense in its entirety.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment




                  • The Packers' 3-4 is more of a "flat" scheme but Guion believes his "attack-and-react" style will translate to nose tackle.
                    I have not seen Dunne refer to the Packer and Caper Defense in this way. I wonder if this is Guion's terminology for it. We might be overestimating the penetrating part of the change. Might simply be more consistent one gap.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                      Barrington, as he was in the previous two games, looks to be the #1 sub. Lattimore after him.

                      If an OLB moves, he will go to the end of the end of the depth chart. Offseason prep is 80% over.

                      Richardson isn't going to see ILB this year unless a boulder falls on the first string defense in its entirety.
                      I'm not so sure that Barrington has moved ahead of Lattimore. I read somewhere that seemed to indicate Lattimore would be the top backup. I think Lattimore rebounded with a better game. He can cover. I think he was a little lax in the first two games, and I criticized him for it. I would think Lattimore would be the guy to replace Jones and Barrington would be the guy to replace Hawk.
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                        Tyler Dunne
                        @TyDunne
                        First cuts announced: CB Antonio Dennard, WR Chris Harper, LB Korey Jones, FB Ina Liaina, QB Chase Rettig and WR Gerrard Sheppard.
                        Harper the first casualty among the WRs - thought I remembered some here having high hopes for him. Looks like that's not going to happen, the former 4th round pick can't seem to put it together. I wonder if he gets another chance somewhere.
                        --
                        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                        Comment


                        • I wonder if the players the Packers cut now either are 1) not eligible for the practice squad based on service time (Harper) or 2) the team's indication that these players were not candidates for the practice squad.
                          "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Carolina_Packer View Post
                            I wonder if the players the Packers cut now either are 1) not eligible for the practice squad based on service time (Harper) or 2) the team's indication that these players were not candidates for the practice squad.
                            Actually, I think Harper is eligible under the new rules.

                            I read an article this week that said many teams use the first cut for players they would like on their PS. Few teams want to mess with waiver claims now with the next cutdown next weekend.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                              Thornton isn't going anywhere. I think he's shown more in the games than the group think amongst the writers.
                              After watching him closely in this last game, Thornton was pretty awful. I thought Boyd played well. Pennel was solid, but had some shaky moments. Nobody else stood out among the young DTs.
                              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Carolina_Packer View Post
                                I wonder if the players the Packers cut now either are 1) not eligible for the practice squad based on service time (Harper) or 2) the team's indication that these players were not candidates for the practice squad.
                                Harper should be PS eligible. (edit: the Urinal scented is saying he is http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/272495891.html)

                                He'll have an accrued season towards FA, but he has to be on the game day roster 9 times for it to count wrt practice squad for it to affect his eligibility. Even if he was (I doubt it but didn't check) the new rules allow there to be up to two players who do have an accrued season on the PS.

                                I'm not sure he's in the conversation though. He didn't even make it past the first cuts, in the past the TT seems to sign a couple of bubble players to the PS, and brings in a couple late cuts from other teams.
                                Last edited by Guiness; 08-25-2014, 08:06 AM.
                                --
                                Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X