Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flynn Tolzien do-over

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I guess I should have said the highest and lowest risk:reward choices. Most people who want Flynn as the backup also want a backup backup. Most people who like Tolzien feel comfortable putting all their eggs in that basket.

    I'm sure TT will cut both and rock Cobb as the backup.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by 3irty1 View Post
      I guess I should have said the highest and lowest risk:reward choices. Most people who want Flynn as the backup also want a backup backup. Most people who like Tolzien feel comfortable putting all their eggs in that basket.

      I'm sure TT will cut both and rock Cobb as the backup.
      I am in the boat of Tolzien is ahead of Flynn but after last year I am not against rolling with 3 QBs on the roster.
      But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

      -Tim Harmston

      Comment


      • #63
        I still don't think we'll keep both Matt and Scott. I suspect we don't have that luxury. I too like Tolzien's upside but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they go with Flynn. I just hope if they do they don't come to regret it. Tolzien isn't going to last too long as a FA.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
          OK, so then you vote for the Packers keeping 3 QBs every season that 3 respectables can be rounded-up?

          That might be overly risk averse, wasteful. Most GMs, include TT, lean to 2
          When it comes to the Packers and injuries I don't think they can be compared to what the rest of the league is doing. They are the exception, in a bad way.

          Comment

          Working...
          X