Tweet
DO....The Chicago Bears have the pieces to be Super Bowl winner?
The author makes a case for this.
I believe the Green Bay Packers will have a strong voice to prevent this.
What's your view?
-
DO....The Chicago Bears have the pieces to be Super Bowl winner?
The author makes a case for this.
I believe the Green Bay Packers will have a strong voice to prevent this.
What's your view?** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau -
I know you can't put any weight on what you see in the preseason but I'm not seeing how their defense is much better than it was last year. They had problems stopping people. They have a potent offense for sure but the Bears are not better than Seattle, San Fransisco, New Orleans or us. -
Quite simply, no.
The offense is fine - execpt for Cutler's penchant for making costly mistakes.
The defense is mediocre.
The special teams will be a bonafide disaster.Who Knows? The Shadow knows!Comment
-
I agree that the Bears seem to be weak defensively.Originally posted by Pugger View Post** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. ThoreauComment
-
No.Comment
-
No. They have a bottom-5 defense. They need at least one more season to fix that and contend.Comment
-
No they do not. Not enough depth and a poor defense.Go PACKComment
-
It doesn't matter how many 7 foot tall receivers with gloves of stickum you have...when the going gets tough, your QB can't suddenly develop a vagina and curl up in the fetal position.It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!Comment
-
Outside of Herm Edwards, this is the greatest sports analysis I have ever seen.Originally posted by King Friday View PostBud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
No, the Bears D is not good and the rest of the NFL has a year of tape on the Bears O.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim HarmstonComment
-
I will gladly join the herd and say that The Shadow knows...
The Bears (D, at least) Still Suck.Comment
-
The Bears? We're talking about the Bears? I thought this wa a football forum. Fucking Bears.All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!Comment
-
Is this 1985? No? Then the answer is fuck no they won't win the SB.Originally posted by 3irty1Comment
-
homerism aside da bears and packers are similar teams....both stacked offenses and sub par defense.
I give gb the edge because we have Rodgers and they have cutlerTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
We have a lot more depth on defense. Specifically at safety, but also CB and OLB.Comment
Comment