Official GameDay Thread Week 2: Jets @ Packers

[Rutnstrut]

He was in in the second quarter.

Did he have any carries?

[red]

Did he have any carries?

no

no carries, no catches

[Bossman641]

Hopefully this was the kick in the pants this team needed cause they have a tough schedule coming up.

[Cheesehead Craig]

They just keep running Lacy wide. Its just stupid.

I'd prefer they do that with Starks, he has more burst to get upfield on those.

[Joemailman]

Really ugly start, but that was a nice comeback against the type of team that can give the Packers trouble. Good things happen when you stop getting gashed by the opponent's running game.

[HarveyWallbangers]

Will it be the kind of game that turns a season around--like an ugly victory at St. Louis in 1996 (Doug Evans interception return) or the thrashing of the Giants in 2010? Probably not, but that was a heck of a comeback.

[pittstang5]

I'll take it. Still scratching my head over that phantom time out or what ever.

[Rutnstrut]

It was a great comeback, but against a team that is even a little better I'm not so sure they would have done it.

[mr_blonde]

Did he have any carries?

I think Starks is going to be traded to Baltimore for Arthur Brown ....

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/09/08/packers-reportedly-work-out-former-redskins-running-back-lache-seastrunk/

Lacey, Harris, Seastrunk going forward.
JMO.

[Joemailman]

Congrats to pbmax on a winning Game Day Thread.

Also Kudos to Red. Packers were down 21-3 when Red started that 2015 Draft Thread. I think that was the turning point.

[Bossman641]

What's going on with Hayward? House and even Bush were getting snaps ahead of him. Hopefully not a hamstring issue.

[Joemailman]

I have said for years that he holds the ball to long, but people on here don't want to hear that AR might have a flaw or two.

You can let the BF butt hurt go now. It has been 6 plus years.

I don't know why people get upset when someone points out that Rodgers sometimes holds onto the ball too long. It's a statistical fact that he holds onto the ball longer than most. Everybody has a weakness. That's his.

[digitaldean]

I don't know why people get upset when someone points out that Rodgers sometimes holds onto the ball too long. It's a statistical fact that he holds onto the ball longer than most. Everybody has a weakness. That's his.

I agree with Joe. The one sack that made it 2nd and 22 was purely on ARod. I get trying to make something happen, but periodically he held it a couple seconds too long. Acknowledge there's nothing there and throw it away if you can't run with it.

BTW, speaking of brain cramps, Stumpy's challenge that essentially traded TO's with NY was just silly.

Bonehead move of the day was Morningweg's timeout call that nullified the TD. Totally changed the semblance of any momentum shift that the Jets could muster.

[Rutnstrut]

I don't know why people get upset when someone points out that Rodgers sometimes holds onto the ball too long. It's a statistical fact that he holds onto the ball longer than most. Everybody has a weakness. That's his.

I don't get it either, I think Rodgers is freakin awesome. I just pointed out the obvious, it's one of his very few flaws as a QB.

[ThunderDan]

I don't know why people get upset when someone points out that Rodgers sometimes holds onto the ball too long. It's a statistical fact that he holds onto the ball longer than most. Everybody has a weakness. That's his.

Because we all agree that ARod holds the ball too long. It's just another everyone is against me, no one here can see any flaws in ARod's game schtick post.

I am sick of them so I decided to call him out on what is really going through his head.