Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Packers/Vikings Discussion Thread Week 5

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Ryan Wood ‏@ByRyanWood 3h3 hours ago
    #Packers injury report:
    Barrington doubtful
    Boyd doubtful
    Boykin out
    Jones probable
    Lang (no injury)probable
    Matthews probable
    Neal probable
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by pbmax View Post
      Ryan Wood ‏@ByRyanWood 3h3 hours ago
      #Packers injury report:
      Barrington doubtful
      Boyd doubtful
      Boykin out
      Jones probable
      Lang (no injury)probable
      Matthews probable
      Neal probable
      That means Pennell and Janis will probably be activated again.
      One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
      John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
        That means Pennell and Janis will probably be activated again.
        Interesting insight. Any thoughts on whether Tolzien will be active?

        Comment


        • #34
          I'm sorry, that was unnecessary roughness against a senior citizen.

          Comment


          • #35
            Stubby made a statement today that Boykin's injury is worse than they originally thought.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
              You're gettin' on the fightin' side of me if you're dissing the Musky Queen.


              60 pounder!! Nice fish.
              wist

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                The Vikings are reeling a bit... Peterson is gone, Bridgewater may not play - Ponder can't win games on his own.

                As inconsistent as we are overall, and as abysmal as we are on defense - I would still expect we will cover the 9 pts.

                I hope they keep reeling like this. 550+ yards of offense last game. As for Bridgewater. they are playing the gametime decision but I think they forgot to tell Teddy to play along. He talked about how much fun it will be to play tomorrow in such a historic stadium. Sure didn't sound like an "if I play". I suppose that in itself could be a ruse.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                  The Vikings are reeling a bit... Peterson is gone, Bridgewater may not play - Ponder can't win games on his own.

                  As inconsistent as we are overall, and as abysmal as we are on defense - I would still expect we will cover the 9 pts.
                  Are you feeling ok? You almost sound......... Optimistic?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
                    Are you feeling ok? You almost sound......... Optimistic?
                    I grade on a different scale of the rest of you guys I guess... I fully expect we should beat a lesser team like the Vikings - no offense Rastak

                    If Bridgewater plays?? He's a rookie, i.e. he'll be big-time up and down... long term he may be the answer for the Vikes, but this season is going to be a big learning curve; and if Ponder starts - Ponder is Ponder.

                    We got waxed by 2 teams that I consider to be better than us - Seattle and Detroit; and we beat a bad Jets team, and looked terrible on defense beating an about even team in the Bears.

                    If Peterson were playing?? I don't think the line would be 9, and I don't think we'd cover 9, but given the circumstances - yes, we should cover. Even with dunderdummy preening his spraypainted hair in the coaches booth
                    wist

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
                      I'm sorry, that was unnecessary roughness against a senior citizen.
                      That's a 15 yard penalty, whippersnapper.
                      One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                      John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        If there's any defense worse than the Packers, it's the Falcons. They have no one. It's a joke.

                        Pack covers the spread. -9 is a sucker number begging for Vikings money after a good game last week.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by mission View Post
                          If there's any defense worse than the Packers, it's the Falcons. They have no one. It's a joke.

                          Pack covers the spread. -9 is a sucker number begging for Vikings money after a good game last week.
                          You really think so? Because while I do not agree with wist as to the causes of the meltdown, I do believe they are still in the middle of correcting it on D.

                          And what kind of offense is likely against a Zimmer D (first year though) in a Cover 2. I want Starks to have 140 yards running zone through a six man box, but I am not sure they are going to get it.
                          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            The big question is whether the Packers defense can get off the field. Packers are dead last at stopping opponents on 3rd down. Opponents have converted 53% of 3rd downs. Packers have also allowed 5 4th down conversions, which is the most in the league. 7 4th down attempts by opponents is the most in the league. All of this has contributed to the Packers being 31st in time of possession, which tires the defense and limits the opportunities of the offense.
                            I can't run no more
                            With that lawless crowd
                            While the killers in high places
                            Say their prayers out loud
                            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                            A thundercloud
                            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I don't like the matchup. I'm not convinced that our passing offense is awake. Rodgers and Jordy sure but there is still not anything going in the middle of the field. Even though Cobb put up good stats on Sunday he still looks like a shell of himself to me. This week he'll face Munnerlyn who is a grade above the backup backups and linebackers he's struggled to separate from. Jordy will get his yards but Rhodes isn't garbage and should get plenty of help ala Detroit. If Rhodes has half the day that Slay had for Detroit, someone else is going to have to step up.

                              On defense, this is a greatest hits of things we've been terrible against. Should look like the diet version of Seattle's offense with tons of rushing, misdirection, and Cordarrelle Patterson playing the part of Percy Harvin.
                              70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by 3irty1 View Post
                                I don't like the matchup. I'm not convinced that our passing offense is awake. Rodgers and Jordy sure but there is still not anything going in the middle of the field. Even though Cobb put up good stats on Sunday he still looks like a shell of himself to me. This week he'll face Munnerlyn who is a grade above the backup backups and linebackers he's struggled to separate from. Jordy will get his yards but Rhodes isn't garbage and should get plenty of help ala Detroit. If Rhodes has half the day that Slay had for Detroit, someone else is going to have to step up.

                                On defense, this is a greatest hits of things we've been terrible against. Should look like the diet version of Seattle's offense with tons of rushing, misdirection, and Cordarrelle Patterson playing the part of Percy Harvin.
                                Great post. Minnesota is 5th in the league in rushing. Packers are dead last in rushing defense. Pack is 5th in the league in pass defense. It's a no brainer. Minnesota is going to rush the ball.

                                On offense, we're 28th in the league rushing. On the other hand we have Aaron Rodgers. Minnesota has a middle of the road pass defense.

                                It's the same old story of the last couple years. Our best chance to win is Rodgers throwing lights out and our defense getting key turnovers... ...And Stubby keeping his head out of the game.
                                One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                                John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X