Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

heroes and goats

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • heroes and goats

    stud: Lacy

    dud: Lane Taylor

    I was thinking of giving TT a dud for having backups of Sherrod, Taylor and Gerhardt. But then I thought about Linsley and decided to spare Ted.

  • #2
    You are forgetting Barclay. We have solid depth until Barclay and Tretter went down.
    Draft Brandin Cooks WR OSU!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
      stud: Lacy

      dud: Lane Taylor

      I was thinking of giving TT a dud for having backups of Sherrod, Taylor and Gerhardt. But then I thought about Linsley and decided to spare Ted.
      In fairness to him, I think Barclay was the plan for a backup at both tackle and guard.

      Comment


      • #4
        Stud: Lady Luck for giving us two very good maybe great quarterbacks in a row, which has kept the hope alive for more super bowls.

        Dud: Lady luck for not giving us the supporting cast to take advantage of Rogers, which may mean no more super bowls in my lifetime.

        Life sucks and then you die...

        Comment


        • #5
          Studs: none

          duds: Stubby and dunderdummy.
          wist

          Comment


          • #6
            Studs: MM, Rodgers, Lacy, Cobb, Sitton, Linsley, Bakh (minus few penalties) and HHCD. Would add Peppers if he didn't drop that TD. I liked MM aggressiveness with the 4th and 1 and the onside kick.

            Duds: Capers, Bulaga, Taylor, Daniels, Boyd, Hawk, Lattimore, Barrington, Jones, Matthews, Hyde, Williams, House, Perry, and Neal.
            Draft Brandin Cooks WR OSU!

            Comment


            • #7
              Studs - Lacy, Cobb
              Duds - Lane Taylor and the OT's, Quarless, Peppers as a TE, the run D, House, tackling by the secondary
              Go PACK

              Comment


              • #8
                As for thread title:

                So, so you think you can tell Heaven from Hell, blue skies from pain.
                Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail?
                A smile from a veil?
                Do you think you can tell?

                Did they get you to trade your heroes for goats?
                Hot ashes for trees?
                Hot air for a cool breeze?
                Cold comfort for change?
                Did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?

                How I wish, how I wish you were here.
                We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
                Running over the same old ground.
                What have we found?
                The same old fears.
                Wish you were here.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Heros for ghosts

                  Smh

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by red View Post
                    Heros for ghosts

                    Smh
                    Not in this thread.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ill mention tramon again. His inability to jump was exposed last week. The saints paid attention and took advantage of that 2 or 3 times that i saw last night.

                      Bigger wrs dont even need to jump with him on them

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MD View Post
                        You are forgetting Barclay. We have solid depth until Barclay and Tretter went down.
                        I don't blame TT for thinking that Sherrod would at least be an average player who could fill in.

                        Our offensive line depth is terrible, but it is an act of God. If I were MM, I would give Tretter snaps at tackle or guard each and every game.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          Wish you were here.
                          Wish I was back in the dorms



                          Actually the dorm sucked and lead to unhealthy lifestyle choices like endless bagels and cream cheese.
                          I think "Dark Side of the Moon" was only Pink Floyd I endulged in, and lava lamps were already corny.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by wist43 View Post
                            Studs: none

                            duds: Stubby and dunderdummy.
                            I totally agree with this.

                            Start with Capers... Reportedly, Capers game plans to stop either the run or the pass, depending upon the opponent. This game, the defense stopped neither the run nor the pass. Mark Ingram rushed for 172 yards, for crying out loud. You can't beat a team with an elite QB by letting them rush for those kind of numbers.

                            As the game went on, the rush defense got worse. No adjustments at halftime on the defense. If there were some, they failed.

                            Capers didn't fool Payton and Brees. The Packers' pass rush was negated by quick throws to the middle and the judicious use of screen passes. In the second half, when Brees got Jimmy Graham involved, the Packers had no answer and it was game over.

                            As bad as Capers performed, Stubby was worse...

                            The Packers' offense started fast, but instead of playing to their strengths, McCarthy got cute. The pass to Peppers was a joke. You've got two of the top WR in the league, a sure-handed rookie, and Quarless who caught the same pass two weeks earlier to win the game against the Dolphins. Instead, Rodgers throws a bullet to an elephant LB. I'm assuming Stubby made the call. I'm assuming they spent valuable game-prep time practicing it. My only question is: Why?

                            Then, for some unknown reason, Stubby decides to get cute with an onsides kick, giving Brees the ball in Packer territory. Again, why? You're 3 points yup. The offense is moving the ball. It's early. Why?

                            Some say Stubby was just being aggressive. I disagree. It was a foolish risk, with an improbably upside, for what? To demoralize Brees?

                            And if Stubby is such an aggressive, risk-happy coach, consider the 4th and 1 call: a fairly pedestrian -- and predictable -- Lacy carry. If McCarthy was a risk-taker, why not fling a pass downfield on that play, with the defense up?

                            The week before, when Payton, Brees and Company took a licking, they took inventory of themselves. Each player looked within himself and took responsibility. They vowed to turn their game around...and did.

                            Let's hope Stubby, Capers and company do the same. This team is not as good as they thought they were.
                            One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                            John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
                              I totally agree with this.


                              The Packers' offense started fast, but instead of playing to their strengths, McCarthy got cute. The pass to Peppers was a joke. You've got two of the top WR in the league, a sure-handed rookie, and Quarless who caught the same pass two weeks earlier to win the game against the Dolphins. Instead, Rodgers throws a bullet to an elephant LB. I'm assuming Stubby made the call. I'm assuming they spent valuable game-prep time practicing it. My only question is: Why?

                              Then, for some unknown reason, Stubby decides to get cute with an onsides kick, giving Brees the ball in Packer territory. Again, why? You're 3 points yup. The offense is moving the ball. It's early. Why?

                              Some say Stubby was just being aggressive. I disagree. It was a foolish risk, with an improbably upside, for what? To demoralize Brees?
                              I thought the Peppers play was clever. McCarthy rarely shows any creativity, as he is a dull moor, so its nice to see a clever play out of him other than the "Raji fullback gut freezer X."

                              The D couldn't stop Brees or that no name RB. Shoulda onsided after every score. Woulda prevented the Saints O from milking too much of the clock.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X