Originally posted by pbmax
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Packers vs. Patriots Discussion Thread
Collapse
X
-
The bolded piece above - I can't remember if that is a McCarthy theme that is commonly sounded, or if it's something I remember hearing a lot in 2010 and not much since."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
-
Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostSo what game plan are we thinking the Patriots are going to come with? Their game plans vary as much as any team in the league.
Are they going to go with the power run like they did against Indy? Or more of a spread it out and try to get it to Gronk on a LB?
I would imagine you'd run on one of the league's worst run defenses. Once they're softened up, you bomb them with Gronk and friends."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
They are going to run until the Packers stop it. They will want to avoid the sub defense so they can pass effectively as well.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Since when is NOT kicking onsides playing conservatively? Or punting from your own territory on 4th down? Or taking what they give you?Originally posted by Tyrion Lannister View PostPlaying conservatively against a good/great team like the Patriots is simply asking for a loss.
The Packers need to be aggressive in all THREE dimensions!
I'd like to see us be opportunistic rather than aggressive. You have the opportunity to throw downfield, take it. Don't force it. You have an opportunity fake a field goal or punt, do it. Don't do it just to do it.
No QB no matter how good likes to play with his back at his own end zone. Field position will help our defense more than anything.One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
Comment
-
Like dunderdummy has any intention whatsoever of covering anybody??Originally posted by pbmax View PostThey are going to run until the Packers stop it. They will want to avoid the sub defense so they can pass effectively as well.
Whether we are in base, nickel, or dime... dunderdummy will let receivers run wide open all over the field - it's what he does.
Did you see that easy 16 yd pitch and catch from Bridgewater to Rudolph?? Dunderdummy was playing man on the WR's and zone underneath. Rudolph was given a free release and simply ran an out pattern to the space vacated by the WR who carried Shields with him downfield - the defender playing zone underneath stayed in his zone, and Rudolph caught the ball without a single Packer with 10 yds of him - that's the brilliance of dunderdummy.
That's Pop Warner stuff - yet dunderdummy does crap like that all the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pats won't afford us the same courtesy - they'll cover everyone short tight and make Rodgers hold the ball.
Talentwise - I think we can win this game; coaching on the other hand... we're way outclassed.wist
Comment
-
The answer to your question is yes.Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostSo what game plan are we thinking the Patriots are going to come with? Their game plans vary as much as any team in the league.
Are they going to go with the power run like they did against Indy? Or more of a spread it out and try to get it to Gronk on a LB?
They'll have their way with dunderdummy - complete mismatch in terms of coaching.
I wish I owned every Patriot in fanstasy this week.wist
Comment
-
Are you talking about the first play of the game where Rudolph ran an out to the left? That was man across the board. Hawk's coverage was awful though, which explains why Capers went to Jones.Originally posted by wist43 View PostDid you see that easy 16 yd pitch and catch from Bridgewater to Rudolph?? Dunderdummy was playing man on the WR's and zone underneath. Rudolph was given a free release and simply ran an out pattern to the space vacated by the WR who carried Shields with him downfield - the defender playing zone underneath stayed in his zone, and Rudolph caught the ball without a single Packer with 10 yds of him - that's the brilliance of dunderdummy.Go PACK
Comment
-
No, it was late in the game... you could see the WR run the clear out, and nobody was assigned to cover outside the hash. Rudolph could have pitched a tent and put up neon signs, and no Packer was going to give him a second thought b/c dunderdummy didn't account for that patch of turf at all.Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostAre you talking about the first play of the game where Rudolph ran an out to the left? That was man across the board. Hawk's coverage was awful though, which explains why Capers went to Jones.
The mess at ILB is almost entirely on TT, although I'm sure dunderdummy and MM signed off and said we were okay there. Still, dunderdummy does so many things that are unsound, that it compounds the mess we have at ILB.wist
Comment
-
So not a broken coverage. Not a player error. He leaves zones in his zone defense unoccupied? This is your contention?Originally posted by wist43 View PostNo, it was late in the game... you could see the WR run the clear out, and nobody was assigned to cover outside the hash. Rudolph could have pitched a tent and put up neon signs, and no Packer was going to give him a second thought b/c dunderdummy didn't account for that patch of turf at all.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
It's a Packer Horror Story! Starring Anthony Michael Hall as AJ Hawk (pretty apt casting, I'd say)Originally posted by pbmax View PostSo not a broken coverage. Not a player error. He leaves zones in his zone defense unoccupied? This is your contention?
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
I read a lot of McGinn's stuff and one thing he has bee harping on all year is that the Packers were going to take Shazier or Mosley if they were available. I know he writes some dumb articles but he is normally pretty well connected with the draft. I obviously can't prove it, but my sense from him is that the Packers favored those players over HHCD.Originally posted by wist43 View PostNo, it was late in the game... you could see the WR run the clear out, and nobody was assigned to cover outside the hash. Rudolph could have pitched a tent and put up neon signs, and no Packer was going to give him a second thought b/c dunderdummy didn't account for that patch of turf at all.
The mess at ILB is almost entirely on TT, although I'm sure dunderdummy and MM signed off and said we were okay there. Still, dunderdummy does so many things that are unsound, that it compounds the mess we have at ILB.Go PACK
Comment
-
Well that's where signing a stop-gap vet to fill a hole would serve the organization well... signing Peppers was a shot in the arm, but we are still impossibly feeble up the middle. We are literally dead at ILB - makes it tough to contend for a title when you have such a huge and glaring weakness right in the middle of your defense.Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostI read a lot of McGinn's stuff and one thing he has bee harping on all year is that the Packers were going to take Shazier or Mosley if they were available. I know he writes some dumb articles but he is normally pretty well connected with the draft. I obviously can't prove it, but my sense from him is that the Packers favored those players over HHCD.
If one of those LB's were there at our pick, and we didn't fill the S spot - then go out and find a veteran S near the end of his career, but still has a little tread left on the tires, and let's make a run at a title; same thing would apply since we got the S - go out and get a competent ILB. Ted simply doesn't think that way.
If we had a half-ass competent DC, we might-could cover up for some of that mess in the middle, but he actually exacerbates it by scheming to ensure that those guys are on the field 24/7 - it's a huge problem that could be schemed around to some extent, but of course dunderdummy doesn't scheme around it, he schemes right into it, and the results are obviously very dismal.wist
Comment
-
If you are Hoody Genius don't you stick Revis on Jordy all day long. Cobb still doesn't naturally get open. Adams will be important this game. If Revis shadows Nelson this might be a game where we REALLY miss having a TE who is worth a shit.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment

Comment