The NFCN just gets weaker

[yetisnowman]

Why decidedly? I was going by seeds going into the playoffs. So on a neutral field you would have Sea v NE, GB vs Denver, Dallas v Indy, Carolina v Pitt, Az v Baltimore, and Det v Cincy. You would give the Nfc a strong edge?

[Pugger]

Why decidedly? I was going by seeds going into the playoffs. So on a neutral field you would have Sea v NE, GB vs Denver, Dallas v Indy, Carolina v Pitt, Az v Baltimore, and Det v Cincy. You would give the Nfc a strong edge?

IMO the best teams in the AFC are NE, Indy and Baltimore while the NFC has Seattle, GB, Dallas and AZ. Lord knows what the Iggles will be this year. I have a strong feeling Denver is going to struggle because Manning is going to be 39 in 11 days.

I just got done watching the rewind of the GB/NE game from last year. We dominated them on yardage and TOP. The only reason the game was as close as it was is we struggled in the red zone - and this issue came back to bite us big time in the NFCC game. If we scored TDs instead of FGs that game isn't even close. I hope these red zone issues is something we address this offseason. Fix that and 2015 is gonna be fun.

[pbmax]

Why decidedly? I was going by seeds going into the playoffs. So on a neutral field you would have Sea v NE, GB vs Denver, Dallas v Indy, Carolina v Pitt, Az v Baltimore, and Det v Cincy. You would give the Nfc a strong edge?

End of last year or beginning of this year?

[vince]

NE and Indy are the class of the AFC and GB and Seattle are the class of the NFC no?

I think that's a toss up at this point as to which two teams are better but I wouldn't say NE and Indy are clearly better than Seattle and GB.

The rest is a toss up as far as I'm concerned. I can't tell yet if Dallas/AZ/Caroline (not thrilled with any of those teams for next year yet), or Baltimore/Denver/Cincy (likewise here) are better. Hell, some team in the NFC (not sure who) and the AFC (likewise) is likely to jump up ahead of some of these teams anyway.

Total tossup to me overall but I think NE, Indy, Seattle and GB appear on a tier above the rest of the teams in this league of parity at this point.

[smuggler]

I have Green Bay and Seattle as the two best. Then New England. Then Dallas and Arizona. Then perhaps the Eagles, then go from there.

[smuggler]

Don't want to deal with argumentative cunts all day. Welcome to ignore, bitch.

[mraynrand]

I'd say incessantly parsing and finding cute responses to small portions of what I say while completely ignoring the rest is much more trollish than anything I do. It isn't really a debate. I am happy to hear other perspectives. I just have a tough time dealing with such absolute claims some fans make that aren't backed up by fact or stats. And the subsequent inabilty to address my questions or counterpoints. It just seems that those kind of blinders are reserved for homerism.

You want to 'debate' then stop calling people homers, fucker.

[Pugger]

NE and Indy are the class of the AFC and GB and Seattle are the class of the NFC no?

I think that's a toss up at this point as to which two teams are better but I wouldn't say NE and Indy are clearly better than Seattle and GB.

The rest is a toss up as far as I'm concerned. I can't tell yet if Dallas/AZ/Caroline (not thrilled with any of those teams for next year yet), or Baltimore/Denver/Cincy (likewise here) are better. Hell, some team in the NFC (not sure who) and the AFC (likewise) is likely to jump up ahead of some of these teams anyway.

Total tossup to me overall but I think NE, Indy, Seattle and GB appear on a tier above the rest of the teams in this league of parity at this point.

I think GB and Seattle are clearly better than Indy.

[Pugger]

[Bossman641]

Is the discussion about which conference is tougher top to bottom or which conference is stronger at the top?

FWIW the AFC was better this year (33-30-1) but a large part of that was the NFC South's general shittiness (3-12-1).

Current odds to win the SB
Colts 5-1
Seahawks 11-2
Packers 11-2
Patriots 6-1
Cowboys 8-1

[yetisnowman]

You want to 'debate' then stop calling people homers, fucker.

Wow now you guys are cussing me out my name. Didn't know the phrase homer would strike such a nerve. Sorry the shoe fits. Maybe you guys could take Arod's dick out your throat and form an opinion and back it up with explanations... that way we can discuss things and understand the perspectives. Take care you big baby.

[yetisnowman]

[QUOTE=Bossman641;830691]Is the discussion about which conference is tougher top to bottom or which conference is stronger at the top?

FWIW the AFC was better this year (33-30-1) but a large part of that was the NFC South's general shittiness (3-12-1).

Current odds to win the SB
Colts 5-1
Seahawks 11-2
Packers 11-2
Patriots 6-1
Cowboys 8-1[/QUOTE


My original statement was that the NFC is weaker. I meant top to bottom.

[yetisnowman]

End of last year or beginning of this year?

I guess I was thinking the beginning of this year. I do feel like Denver and Baltimore take a step back but I still have to give them and edge over the bottom playoff teams in the NFC just because of the QBs accomplishments and playoff runs.

[yetisnowman]

Don't want to deal with argumentative cunts all day. Welcome to ignore, bitch.

AWWW.........ruined my day! I said what is basis for your contention? Sorry you are too dumb to answer. And too dumb to see that obviously the AFC is competetive at the top of the conference since the PATS won the super bowl. Grow some nuts and at least back up your retarded claims. Or don't make them.

[mraynrand]

Wow now you guys are cussing me out my name. Didn't know the phrase homer would strike such a nerve. Sorry the shoe fits. Maybe you guys could take Arod's dick out your throat and form an opinion and back it up with explanations... that way we can discuss things and understand the perspectives. Take care you big baby.

that's what I expected. You're not interested in discussion. neither am I interested in your ad hominems. and I see you don't like it either. But, no longer. You're ignored.