Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

McGinn Love

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
    McGinn is one of the best beat writers in the NFL
    I've always had that position and maintain it; perhaps because he often agrees with me.......lol
    But he's a great writer.

    People often light him up when he is not on the kool aide train; that is not what he's paid to do
    Sounds like you like McGinn's POV. I think he is a so-so writer skill-wise (technically he is sound, but his writing lacks verve and inspiration), and that his insights are not much better or more prescient than any fan who knows a decent amount about football. But he's a hard worker and provides good content. He seems quite distant from the players, but that's OK, because few players have much insight either and/or are unwilling to share much of it (I don't blame them). Just because he sin't a team shill isn't a reason to dislike him, but at times he most certainly is deliberately controversial (there is a difference between asking a challenging question and specifically trying to create tension; Bob often does the latter).
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

    Comment


    • #17
      What he said.
      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

      KYPack

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
        (technically he is sound, but his writing lacks verve and inspiration) .
        Your posts are technically unsound and lack verve and inspiration. You could never fill Bob McGinn's loafers.

        McGinn is the man.

        Comment


        • #19
          I NEVER liked McGinn.
          What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

          Comment


          • #20
            The absolute trust of scouts drives me nuts. It not based on any kind of success rate. Its just a cudgel to beat arguments to death from readers and fans. "They do it for a living, you are just fans" WHOMP WHOMP WHOMP.

            Scouts spout off ALL the time about things and players they don't know and don't understand, using the hoariest cliches. And the opinions on skill level are always a choice of terrible, replaceable and great. The insights about how they play often betray less familiarity than I have with the Packers.

            Its different with college players, because I don't know them at all, but I am not sure the insight is any better.

            However, he does hold to team accountable for success and addressing areas of weakness. He is willing to publish facts that do not reflect well on the team. Those are good things that are not evident in every beat writer (Demovsky probably comes in second and I am not sure who would be third). Dougherty and Oates are happy to bash obvious faults, but they don't report internal material very often.

            He is careful and scrupulous in his reporting. The columns can be dicey, especially the Sunday Game Day bombshells. Some of those would fit in a NY tabloid.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
              You could never fill Bob McGinn's loafers..
              I thought you were the one who was light in the loafers.
              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                The absolute trust of scouts drives me nuts. It not based on any kind of success rate. Its just a cudgel to beat arguments to death from readers and fans. "They do it for a living, you are just fans" WHOMP WHOMP WHOMP.

                Scouts spout off ALL the time about things and players they don't know and don't understand, using the hoariest cliches. And the opinions on skill level are always a choice of terrible, replaceable and great. The insights about how they play often betray less familiarity than I have with the Packers.

                Its different with college players, because I don't know them at all, but I am not sure the insight is any better.

                However, he does hold to team accountable for success and addressing areas of weakness. He is willing to publish facts that do not reflect well on the team. Those are good things that are not evident in every beat writer (Demovsky probably comes in second and I am not sure who would be third). Dougherty and Oates are happy to bash obvious faults, but they don't report internal material very often.

                He is careful and scrupulous in his reporting. The columns can be dicey, especially the Sunday Game Day bombshells. Some of those would fit in a NY tabloid.
                This. Especially the comment on the scouts. The scouts are often wrong and even contradict each other.
                "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                Comment


                • #23
                  This isn't good, rom Bob today: http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/323330421.html

                  Green Bay — Chip Kelly doesn't care about NFL orthodoxy, reputations, traditions. Nothing.

                  Show up soft, slow, disorganized, unemotional and unprepared against Kelly's Philadelphia Eagles, as coach Mike McCarthy's Green Bay Packers did Saturday night at Lambeau Field, and you'll get taken to the proverbial woodshed.
                  It was the third preseason game. It was the dress rehearsal for most teams, even the Packers on defense. Exactly what is it about Chip Kelly that made the difference yesterday? Was it his disregard for traditions and orthodoxy? No, he played it straight and he torched an underperforming defense that had its normal 11 out there for the first time in preseason.

                  This game was evidence of Chip's ORTHODOXY Bob. Writing on deadline doesn't lend itself to deep arguments. These two paragraphs read like click bait. And only one of them applies to the game.
                  Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I think Chip Kelly treated it as regular season game; we treated it as a preseason game.

                    Most of our looks and play-calling were straight-up vanilla. MM and DC are not going to show anything even if it is the so-called dress rehearsal for the season.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Scoops McGinn
                      Show up soft, slow, disorganized, unemotional and unprepared against Kelly's Philadelphia Eagles,
                      Show up with mouth-breathing histrionics, and the players will never talk to you.
                      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                        I think Chip Kelly treated it as regular season game; we treated it as a preseason game.

                        Most of our looks and play-calling were straight-up vanilla. MM and DC are not going to show anything even if it is the so-called dress rehearsal for the season.
                        Actually, the Packers use cards and do scout team work for preseason games. Not all teams even do that much game planning.

                        But I do think Chip was all in with his starters in the game. But the game plan was to keep Bradford out of the hospital.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          Actually, the Packers use cards ...
                          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                            Is that the Cobb catch in Chicago in the signature?
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                              Is that the Cobb catch in Chicago in the signature?
                              Indeed. 12to18W.
                              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                                Originally posted by Scoops McGinn
                                Show up soft, slow, disorganized, unemotional and unprepared against Kelly's Philadelphia Eagles,
                                Show up with mouth-breathing histrionics, and the players will never talk to you.
                                That's writing - full of verve. Inspired.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X