Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charles Woodson 2 interceptions away from being #5 all-time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Charles Woodson 2 interceptions away from being #5 all-time

    I really like seeing him move up the list. He is one of my all time favorite packers. That's a big accomplishment.

    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  • #2
    Tied for 35. Terrell Buckley 50Ints 1992-2005 6Teams
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #3
      He is the only active player on this list. QBs have gotten better at not throwing INTs over the years. Of course, everyone was throwing them then, so they didn't influence results of the games as dramatically as they do now...

      Who's the next best active player?
      No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

      Comment


      • #4

        Deangelo Hall is next active player - 21 behind Woodson
        Last edited by vince; 10-16-2015, 10:09 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Great, Great Packer

          Comment


          • #6
            Really one of the most unique players I've seen. Especially in 2009-2010, you didn't know where he was going to line up. Corner, slot, safety, even linebacker sometimes.
            I can't run no more
            With that lawless crowd
            While the killers in high places
            Say their prayers out loud
            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
            A thundercloud
            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm sorry we let him walk tbh.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
                He is the only active player on this list. QBs have gotten better at not throwing INTs over the years. Of course, everyone was throwing them then, so they didn't influence results of the games as dramatically as they do now...

                Who's the next best active player?

                BS Cutler still plays.
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                  I'm sorry we let him walk tbh.
                  It does seem like an relatively uncommon mistake by TT. We've all heard the refrain "it's better to let a player go a year early than a year late" and Woodson certainly seems to be a case of a year (or two) too early. In his last season with the Pack he looked to have lost too much speed and was a liability, but TT and MM underestimated Woodson's ability to re-invent himself.
                  --
                  Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    CHUCK!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think we let him go because of the repeat collarbone injury. He's been healthy in Oakland though...

                      He has an outside chance of getting to #3, but he'll never touch Krause or Tunnell...
                      Last edited by smuggler; 10-18-2015, 08:57 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                        I think we let him go because of the repeat collarbone injury. He's been healthy in Oakland though...

                        He has an outside chance of getting to #3, but he'll never touch Krause or Tunnell...
                        Woodson doesn't tackle anymore, and I don't blame him. He already hurt his shoulder this year. He just sits deep and cleans up. I think the coaches are asking him to just spy and get INTs.
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Riley sure stands out on that list, everyone else in the top 10 is, will be (Woodson and Reed shouldn't have much trouble), or coulda been (Sharper was probably going to make it) in the HOF. Riley probably got jobed because he played for a team that had so little success and got no exposure during his career.
                          --
                          Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                            I think we let him go because of the repeat collarbone injury. He's been healthy in Oakland though...

                            He has an outside chance of getting to #3, but he'll never touch Krause or Tunnell...
                            I think money was an issue too. I think it would have cost the Packers in excess of 10 million to keep him. Paying Woodson that kind of money would have hurt the Packers elsewhere.
                            I can't run no more
                            With that lawless crowd
                            While the killers in high places
                            Say their prayers out loud
                            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                            A thundercloud
                            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                              I think money was an issue too. I think it would have cost the Packers in excess of 10 million to keep him. Paying Woodson that kind of money would have hurt the Packers elsewhere.
                              Right, I'd forgotten about that. $10M is about right, he had signed a 5yr/$55M extension a couple of years before that was pretty much pay as you go.
                              --
                              Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X