Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Combined offense and defense effectiveness

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Combined offense and defense effectiveness

    After 6 games for each, except Atlanta:
    Team - Points for - Points against - Net points

    AZ - 203 - 115 - 88
    NE - 213 - 126 - 87
    GB - 164 - 101 - 63
    Cin- 182 - 122 - 60
    Car- 162 - 110 - 52
    NYJ- 152 - 105 - 47
    Atl - 193 - 150 - 43 (After 7 games)
    Den- 139 - 102 - 37

    Since I am confident the Packer offense will improve, I like the Packers overall position.
    As of this morning, the Packers are #1 in least points allowed and in lowest pts/game surrendered.

  • #2
    The gap from 2-3 seems pretty significant.

    The offense has been underperforming expectations. Injuries are the obvious excuse, but I wonder if play calling is contributing given the change there?

    Comment


    • #3
      Slightly distressed that the Packers have 2 more points than the Panthers.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by pbmax View Post
        Slightly distressed that the Packers have 2 more points than the Panthers.
        Slightly impressive that the Packers D has allowed 9 fewer points than the Panthers.
        But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

        -Tim Harmston

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
          The gap from 2-3 seems pretty significant.

          The offense has been underperforming expectations. Injuries are the obvious excuse, but I wonder if play calling is contributing given the change there?
          That confirms my feeling that NE and CIN are for real and I am still not sure about ARI.

          I have seen two full Patriot games and they have looked impressive. They use a dink and dunk passing game that Packer fans are complaining about this year.
          Last edited by ThunderDan; 10-26-2015, 02:44 PM.
          But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

          -Tim Harmston

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
            Slightly impressive that the Packers D has allowed 9 fewer points than the Panthers.
            That is also true. I would have lost a bet on those two conditions holding true before the season started.
            Last edited by pbmax; 10-26-2015, 05:56 PM.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #7
              Injuries. Need the WR position to be healthy and productive.

              Comment


              • #8
                Pack need Gronk!
                C.H.U.D.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Freak Out View Post
                  Pack need Gronk!
                  Gronk and Kuechly are not normal human beings.
                  I can't run no more
                  With that lawless crowd
                  While the killers in high places
                  Say their prayers out loud
                  But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                  A thundercloud
                  They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                    Gronk and Kuechly are not normal human beings.
                    you got that right. couple of beasts...especially gronk.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Kuechly? Thomas Davis is the guy too look out for. Scary dude.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                        Injuries. Need the WR position to be healthy and productive.
                        Having a gimpy Lacy hasn't helped us either.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                          Injuries. Need the WR position to be healthy and productive.
                          Originally posted by Pugger View Post
                          Having a gimpy Lacy hasn't helped us either.
                          The O-line has been banged up, too.

                          For those reasons, I think the offense will come around the second half of the season. In an ideal world, Adams will come back and move everyone other than Cobb down the WR hierarchy. They will find a way to incorporate Janis' speed and/or Abrederis' precision routes into their schemes. Lacy will get with it, or Starks will play more. Bakhtiari, Lang and Bulaga will get past their injuries, if they haven't already.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Patler View Post
                            The O-line has been banged up, too.

                            For those reasons, I think the offense will come around the second half of the season. In an ideal world, Adams will come back and move everyone other than Cobb down the WR hierarchy. They will find a way to incorporate Janis' speed and/or Abrederis' precision routes into their schemes. Lacy will get with it, or Starks will play more. Bakhtiari, Lang and Bulaga will get past their injuries, if they haven't already.

                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment


                            • #15

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X