Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Beefs with Ted Thompson draft choices.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    When drafting always go for the bigger guy, that what most coaches do!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by dahammer001 View Post
      When drafting always go for the bigger guy, that what most coaches do!
      You'd end up with a team full of lineman.

      Comment


      • #18
        I find it fascinating that people who don't normally visit the forum show up in droves when the Packers suffer a bad loss or two.
        No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

        Comment


        • #19
          Not true. Why do the NFL have a combine because they are looking for big fast human beings. Scenario you have two high school QB's with the same arm strength, but one qb is 6.4 220 Lbs and the other qb is 5:11 205, which player do you think has a better chance of landing a major scholarship? The big qb

          Comment


          • #20
            The talking heads on one of the pregame or post game shows earlier this season were discussing the subtle yet definite change among NFL teams to be re-emphasizing athleticism over sheer size on both lines.

            Comment


            • #21
              Who would you take an athletic 5:8 cb or athletic 6;1 cb? Always take the bigger guy.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by dahammer001 View Post
                Not true. Why do the NFL have a combine because they are looking for big fast human beings. Scenario you have two high school QB's with the same arm strength, but one qb is 6.4 220 Lbs and the other qb is 5:11 205, which player do you think has a better chance of landing a major scholarship? The big qb
                Do you really think TT would draft the smaller guy in your scenario? If it were that simple, they could hire you to do the job for a quarter of what they pay TT.

                Here's a scenario, you have 1) a 6'2" DB that had a single INT (a pass the WR deflected) through college and ran a 4.6 40; 2) a 5'10" DB that led the nation in INTs and ran a 4.4 40. Who do think has a better chance of being drafted?

                Comment


                • #23
                  2010 NFL draft - safeties order selected:

                  Eric Berry - 6'0", 211#
                  Earl Thomas - 5'10", 202#
                  Nate Allen - 6'1", 210#
                  TJ Ward - 5'10", 200#
                  Taylor Mays - 6'3", 225#

                  Do you think the Chiefs, Seahawks, Eagles or Browns regret passing on the bigger guy, Taylor Mays?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Patler View Post
                    2010 NFL draft - safeties order selected:

                    Eric Berry - 6'0", 211#
                    Earl Thomas - 5'10", 202#
                    Nate Allen - 6'1", 210#
                    TJ Ward - 5'10", 200#
                    Taylor Mays - 6'3", 225#

                    Do you think the Chiefs, Seahawks, Eagles or Browns regret passing on the bigger guy, Taylor Mays?
                    Give me Mays over Earl Thomas every day of the week and twice on Sundays.
                    Originally posted by 3irty1
                    This is museum quality stupidity.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      With the parity measures built into the NFL you've got to find value anywhere you can get it. In the draft that would mean spending your picks on players with attributes that are undervalued by the rest of the league. You're advocating the opposite.
                      70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by dahammer001 View Post
                        Not true. Why do the NFL have a combine because they are looking for big fast human beings. Scenario you have two high school QB's with the same arm strength, but one qb is 6.4 220 Lbs and the other qb is 5:11 205, which player do you think has a better chance of landing a major scholarship? The big qb
                        The fact that the Packer's don't offer scholarships probably explains the lack of blue chip prospects in Green Bay.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                          The fact that the Packer's don't offer scholarships probably explains the lack of blue chip prospects in Green Bay.
                          It could help in the cheerleading department
                          All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            i don't care if they're big or small, i just wish our guys we better

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I think some of you guys are missing the point. I knew when I started this discussion it would up in the toilet. I'm through....

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by dahammer001 View Post
                                Who would you take an athletic 5:8 cb or athletic 6;1 cb? Always take the bigger guy.
                                That's what your mom said.
                                "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                                KYPack

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X