Mike Freeman article takes a LOT of shots at the wide receivers trying to replace Nelson. Not much time on their injuries.
Doesn't spend much time considering the wisdom of trying to get 1st and 2nd year players to catch up that fast. Though Rodgers did say they have returned to the basics during preparation.
I do like the Brady theory of offensive talent.
Its almost too tilted in perspective until they get to the Defensive coaches talking about the Packer WRs. Called them bottom 5 of League and that Freeman himself could cover Davante Adams one on one. Essentially making the point that tight man to man and Cover 0 is the greatest sign of disrespect to a group of WR imaginable.
Doesn't spend much time considering the wisdom of trying to get 1st and 2nd year players to catch up that fast. Though Rodgers did say they have returned to the basics during preparation.
I do like the Brady theory of offensive talent.
Its almost too tilted in perspective until they get to the Defensive coaches talking about the Packer WRs. Called them bottom 5 of League and that Freeman himself could cover Davante Adams one on one. Essentially making the point that tight man to man and Cover 0 is the greatest sign of disrespect to a group of WR imaginable.

Comment