3-0 or 0-3?

[Joemailman]

I like TPB. He's the anti-Wist.

Where is Wist? He's had plenty of opportunities to bash the Pack - or has he devolved into only bashing SprayPaintHair?

If so, he missed lots of chances to unload on Stubby or Ted.

Ah, but the season is still young.

I don't think Wist has much to say. The defense is keeping the Pack in games while the offense struggles. That's just the opposite of what Wist has always claimed the problem was.

[Fritz]

I always enjoy any critique that includes the idea that the GM or head coach simply doesn't care about some aspect of the team's performance. Imagine Ted saying "Ah, Mike, who gives a care about stopping the run? I don't."

[Harlan Huckleby]

So, the possibilities for the next three games are: 3-0, 2-1, 1-2 or 0-3? I'm impressed. Are you available for consulting work should I decide to head out to Vegas next Spring?

There is more wisdom to be attained from my statement, grasshopper. I'm suggesting that 3-0 or 0-3 are unlikely outcomes. Plus since there are no real trends to the Packer season, each game should be considered independently. If the Packers win or lose two in a row, the third game is still a 50-50 proposition. Even the competition doesn't much matter - Packers seem fully capable of losing to anybody.

[mraynrand]

I don't think Wist has much to say. The defense is keeping the Pack in games while the offense struggles. That's just the opposite of what Wist has always claimed the problem was.

I guarantee he will never admit he's wrong*








*unless to spite me!