Originally posted by mraynrand
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Win or Lose? @Washington or Vs. Seattle/Minnesota for Playoffs
Collapse
X
-
You seem to be contradicting yourself. By saying we should sit our dinged up linemen and Rodgers and pointing out how a loss would be beneficial in giving us a easier schedule next season. You are not rooting for us to lose per se. But I'm not sure rooting for us to put ourselves in a position where we most certainly will lose is much different.
-
Error detected. Some of the kool-aid drinkers are with you in the Lose vote.Originally posted by Rutnstrut View PostI'm one of them. Where the fuck has winning the division gotten this team the last how many years? It's just so Kool-aid drinking homers can say stubby shouldn't be fired because he has won the division x years in a row.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
I think there is a pretty clear line here. Rest the wounded as much as possible and start backups. Even a loss, should it be suffered because of the backups, comes wth benefits down the line. In addition to a bye week for the banged up.Originally posted by yetisnowman View PostYou seem to be contradicting yourself. By saying we should sit our dinged up linemen and Rodgers and pointing out how a loss would be beneficial in giving us a easier schedule next season. You are not rooting for us to lose per se. But I'm not sure rooting for us to put ourselves in a position where we most certainly will lose is much different.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
LOSING ...JUST....SUCKS.
You never plan to lose unless YOUR A LOSER !** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment
-
Yes, there are two separate issues: 1) play to lose to deliberately or 2) rest the injured to get them healthy (and if you rest three O-linemen or more, it wold be crazy to put Rodgers out there and try to run your exact same offense).Originally posted by pbmax View PostI think there is a pretty clear line here. Rest the wounded as much as possible and start backups. Even a loss, should it be suffered because of the backups, comes wth benefits down the line. In addition to a bye week for the banged up.
The issue isn't about playing to lose or liking or hating the Vikings, it's about the best overall strategy for winning playoff games. I'm OK if people think my strategy sucks, but that's all I'm arguing for: what I think is the better strategy for playoff success.
That's why I say rest the injured, put Hundley in there, and design a game plan that is simple and takes advantage of his skills. And then launch it on Minnesota totally unexpectedly and make them adjust on the fly."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
-
I don't agree with the premise of the poll, nor your view of it.Originally posted by esoxx View PostExactly. Fuck losing and the losing losers that voted lose in this god damn nonpublic poll.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
I know, I was just trying to get esoxx riled upOriginally posted by pbmax View PostError detected. Some of the kool-aid drinkers are with you in the Lose vote.
I don't want the Pack to lose, ever. But if some of the players could get a bit more healthy by resting Sunday. I'm all for that. If they play as flat as they have been, it won't matter who is on the field Sunday night.
Comment
-
I don't disagree with your strategy completely. I was just surprised it came from you. Again, why was it "unnacceptable" for me to root for Minny to beat Seattle, yet ok in your eyes if we purposefully don't field our best players that may be not 100%, and lose to the Vikings. That's what I don't get. I too was motivated by what I thought gave my favorite team the best chance at playoff success.Originally posted by mraynrand View PostYes, there are two separate issues: 1) play to lose to deliberately or 2) rest the injured to get them healthy (and if you rest three O-linemen or more, it wold be crazy to put Rodgers out there and try to run your exact same offense).
The issue isn't about playing to lose or liking or hating the Vikings, it's about the best overall strategy for winning playoff games. I'm OK if people think my strategy sucks, but that's all I'm arguing for: what I think is the better strategy for playoff success.
That's why I say rest the injured, put Hundley in there, and design a game plan that is simple and takes advantage of his skills. And then launch it on Minnesota totally unexpectedly and make them adjust on the fly.
Comment
-
I see where you're coming from. Probably in your example about the Vikings and Seattle, I was just being too extreme. I generally have the same wishes when rivals play each other - to get the outcome best for the Packers. If the Vikings play the Bears for example, I'll want both teams to look horrible, and have the home team win, unless the home team is closer than the other team to the Packers in the standings. Probably my reaction to the Vikings Seattle game (is that the one?) was just a visceral reaction to the idea of 'rooting for' the Vikings.Originally posted by yetisnowman View PostI don't disagree with your strategy completely. I was just surprised it came from you. Again, why was it "unnacceptable" for me to root for Minny to beat Seattle, yet ok in your eyes if we purposefully don't field our best players that may be not 100%, and lose to the Vikings. That's what I don't get. I too was motivated by what I thought gave my favorite team the best chance at playoff success.
I want the Packers to play to win this weekend, but if it makes more sense to keep some injured guys out to better their playoff chances, I'm OK with it."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Do what you need to do to avoid Seattle; I can't stomach being their bitch again.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
This team has sucked all optimism out of me; If you could give me a playoff win regardless of circumstance I really don't care.
I will admit that I also cheered for GB to lose at the end of their season when they ended up with the second pick in the draft. I was pissed when we won our last game and lost out on Troy Aikman. Then I was more pissed when they drafted Tony Mandarich over Derrick Thomas (my preference) and Barry Sanders (my second choice). Deon Sanders was the 5th pick that year. We really got boned with our pickTERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment
-
Originally posted by esoxx View PostExactly MadScientist. Fuck losing and the losing losers that voted lose in this god damn non-public poll.
** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment

Comment