trade rodgers?

[red]

how many 1st round picks do you guys think a-rod could net us?

the numbers work out, we would actually save money by trading him

the whole struggles of the offence could be due to him regressing, if thats a case, we need to sell high

now it sounds nuts at first thought, but if we can get 4 or 5 first round picks, and if he is really regressing like he looks to be

then maybe its something that needs to be thought about

[Bossman641]

No

[esoxx]

Hell no.

[Freak Out]

4 or 5 first round picks?

[King Friday]

4 or 5 first round picks?

Which Ted would promptly turn into his dream scenario...acquiring all picks in rounds 4 through 7.

[smuggler]

King Friday, you jest, but TT would be able to successfully beat-off in under 30 seconds in that scenario.

[Freak Out]

LOL

[woodbuck27]

King Friday, you jest, but TT would be able to successfully beat-off in under 30 seconds in that scenario.

Does he love fish?

[Infamous]

lol

[pbmax]

You could have 5 first round picks in consecutive years, even say they were all Top 10 and not get a Pro Bowl QB.

[Patler]

If developmentally Hundley is where Rodgers was in 2008.........................

[woodbuck27]

This may be a serious topic of conversation in 1-2 more years.

Aaron Rodgers costs the team a lot in terms of how much of the pie his pay check removes from the pie.

ARod needs to be 'the ULTIMATE LEADER'.

ARod needs the BEST attitude. He needs to treat his OL as if their a Band of Brothers. Give-give =give a lot to his OL and never piss that OL off.

[pbmax]

If developmentally Hundley is where Rodgers was in 2008.........................

A fifth round pick after one year?

[Patler]

A fifth round pick after one year?

That's my point, trading Rodgers now would be a step backward of significance. However, I have already suggested in another thread a week ago or so that three years from now, Rodgers will be at a point where there will be no dead money hit to the Packers cap if he were traded, and Hundley's contract will be expiring.

http://packerrats.com/showthread.php...-of-the-future

If Hundley looks like a legitimate starter, would you let him go for another 2 or 3 years from Rodgers?

[pbmax]

That's my point, trading Rodgers now would be a step backward of significance. However, I have already suggested in another thread a week ago or so that three years from now, Rodgers will be at a point where there will be no dead money hit to the Packers cap if he were traded, and Hundley's contract will be expiring.

http://packerrats.com/showthread.php...-of-the-future

If Hundley looks like a legitimate starter, would you let him go for another 2 or 3 years from Rodgers?

For next season? No.

The following season (Hundley's 3rd)? Maybe.