MCGINN---NEW JSO ARTICLES..........THE BLAME FALLS ON

[pbmax]

W/O even looking guys that went into the unrestricted free agency period were Delanie Walker, Charles Clay, and Jordan Cameron.

Walker was fine ($17/4). Did Clay have a monster season or come off a monster season? He got 5 years and $38 million. He had one year cap hit of $13 million, otherwise averages nearly $7 mil per year on cap. I don't think that is in the budget.

Jordan Cameron ($15/2). Nope.

[mraynrand]

W/O even looking guys that went into the unrestricted free agency period were Delanie Walker, Charles Clay, and Jordan Cameron.

Jordan Cameron is a piece of shit for the money he's getting. 4.5 2015 and 9.5 2016 against the cap for 35 receptions and a few TDs. Much rather have Cameron Jordan.

[3irty1]

Since we've already got Dickrod who's at worst a stopgap you can win with I hope Ted swings for the fence on a TE. I want the Janis equivalent of a TE. A super freak with unlimited upside and probably a position change or learning disability. I'm imagining Lenny from Of Mice and Men.

[mraynrand]

Since we've already got Dickrod who's at worst a stopgap you can win with I hope Ted swings for the fence on a TE. I want the Janis equivalent of a TE. A super freak with unlimited upside and probably a position change or learning disability. I'm imagining Lenny from Of Mice and Men.

[pbmax]

^Also likely to be a (former) basketball player.

[Pugger]

Hmmm....maybe Jimmy Graham's available.

For JC Tretter.

I'd rather keep Tretter...

[call_me_ishmael]

Smidgeon, while it is cool to dig through games started, etc, I think it's a false step. Someone has to start every game, so that doesn't necessarily say much about quality or if the player on the Packers is significantly better than someone they could find off the street that could step in.

Without question, the odds of landing a difference maker are better the higher you pick. Frankly, the Packers have enough "guys", and could use an extra difference maker or two. I would not be mad at all if they gave up all of their lower round picks for additional rounds 1-4 picks.

[wist43]

I'll take that bet, but only if I get a coffee with it.

Theoretically our schedule is easier - so we got that going for us, but...

We finished 10-6, and 3-3 in the division - that would have been 9-7 and 2-4 but for a hail mary.

We're going to lose some good players - and TT will not go outside the organization to replace them; hence, we are likely to regress a bit. They will never change their philosophy with respect to the offensive line, so the first time someone goes down, it will be musical chairs with a bunch of non-run blocking, out of position G's attempting to play T. Translation? Rodgers will be running for his life again, and MM will get him sacked 6 times in the first half of every game until he figures out he needs to give the T's help...

It'll be the same old rerun... TT and MM are remarkably consistent.

[woodbuck27]

Since we've already got Dickrod who's at worst a stopgap you can win with I hope Ted swings for the fence on a TE. I want the Janis equivalent of a TE. A super freak with unlimited upside and probably a position change or learning disability. I'm imagining Lenny from Of Mice and Men.

" Thick as a Brick " !? mmmm

We DO...........need toughness !!

[woodbuck27]

Theoretically our schedule is easier - so we got that going for us, but...

We finished 10-6, and 3-3 in the division - that would have been 9-7 and 2-4 but for a hail mary.

We're going to lose some good players - and TT will not go outside the organization to replace them; hence, we are likely to regress a bit. They will never change their philosophy with respect to the offensive line, so the first time someone goes down, it will be musical chairs with a bunch of non-run blocking, out of position G's attempting to play T. Translation? Rodgers will be running for his life again, and MM will get him sacked 6 times in the first half of every game until he figures out he needs to give the T's help...

It'll be the same old rerun... TT and MM are remarkably consistent.

Translation: One word and TT and MM.

Here it comes from 'ONE' that knows !



L O S E R S !! !! !! !! !!

[mraynrand]

Theoretically our schedule is easier - so we got that going for us, but...

We finished 10-6, and 3-3 in the division - that would have been 9-7 and 2-4 but for a hail mary.

We're going to lose some good players - and TT will not go outside the organization to replace them; hence, we are likely to regress a bit. They will never change their philosophy with respect to the offensive line, so the first time someone goes down, it will be musical chairs with a bunch of non-run blocking, out of position G's attempting to play T. Translation? Rodgers will be running for his life again, and MM will get him sacked 6 times in the first half of every game until he figures out he needs to give the T's help...

It'll be the same old rerun... TT and MM are remarkably consistent.

So, cutting to the chase, if GB makes the NFC Championship in the 2016 season, you owe me a donut and coffee. If they lose in the Divisional or earlier, I owe you the same.

[Joemailman]

It'll be the same old rerun... TT and MM are remarkably consistent.

They're not the only ones.