Is there a place to look at...

[HarveyWallbangers]

I'm undecided on Rogers. I'd say no, but we do need a veteran receiver. I'd take a chance on Tyrone Calico.

[Tony Oday]

Rogers has actually been a solid deep threat though he keeps getting hurt so Jennings you are wrong there.

[MJZiggy]

Rogers has actually been a solid deep threat though he keeps getting hurt so Jennings you are wrong there.

Just what we need: a deep threat that keeps getting hurt. There are about 30 WR that got cut yesterday. Why is everyone so interested in this one? Is he that much better than EVERY WR out there?

[RashanGary]

Tony Oday “I just think it would be easier for Rogers to stay out of trouble in GB resurect his career ala Rison and Ponder Man that guy can return Kicks!”

GregJennings
“The difference between Rison and Rogers is that Rison acctually played at a high level in the NFL through his whole career. Rogers has been junk since he got in the league. Getting Rison, you took on a good player with some character risk. Taking on Rogers would be taking on crap who also happnes to have a bad attitude. It's pretty hard to compare those two the way you just did.”

Tony Oday
Rogers has actually been a solid deep threat yeah, if you consider 1 35 yard catchin 3 years solid though he keeps getting hurt so Jennings you are wrong there.

And here is the evidence


Rodgers

2003 DET 5 22 243 11.0 33 3 13 0 0
2004 DET 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0
2005 DET 9 14 197 14.1 35 1 11 0 0

Career 15-games 36-catches 440-yards 12.2-YPC 35-LONG 4-TD's

Rison

1989 IND 16 52 820 15.8 61 4 0 0 0
1990 ATL 16 82 1208 14.7 75 10 0 0 0
1991 ATL 16 81 976 12.0 39 12 0 0 0
1992 ATL 15 93 1119 12.0 71 11 0 0 0
1993 ATL 16 86 1242 14.4 53 15 0 0 0
1994 ATL 15 81 1088 13.4 69 8 57 1 0
1995 CLE 16 47 701 14.9 59 3 38 1 0
1996 GNB 5 13 135 10.4 22 1 8 1 0
1996 JAC 10 34 458 13.5 61 2 17 0 0
1997 KAN 16 72 1092 15.2 45 7 54 0 0
1998 KAN 14 40 542 13.6 80 5 22 1 0
1999 KAN 15 21 218 10.4 20 0 11 0 0
2000 OAK 16 41 606 14.8 49 6 29 0 0

Career 186-games 743-catches 10205-yards 13.7-YPC 80-LONG 84-TD's

Rison was one of the NFL’s all time best WR’s. He started strong, played strong through his whole career and finished strong. He was healthy, explosive, reliable and most importantly, productive. He made a difference in almost every game he played. He was a HOF type player from his rookie year and on. There was only one year of his 12 year career that was less productive than Rogers combined first 3 years. You can compare TO to Rison, but don’t bring this Charles Rogers crap to the table. Rison was a great player. Rogers is crap. Ferguson has been more productive.

[Tony Oday]

Im comparing their individual attitudes not production. Rogers has a great chance to be a solid deep threat and good WR.

[RashanGary]

Im comparing their individual attitudes not production. Rogers has a great chance to be a solid deep threat and good WR.

Acctually, this is what you said "I just think it would be easier for Rogers to stay out of trouble in GB resurect his career ala Rison"

First of all, for Rogers to have to reserect his career, he'd of had to erect it first. Honestly, there is nothing you can say that would make me believe you had even a shred of crediblity in your original quote that I posted above in bold. I think you're just being stubborn.