Originally posted by wist43
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everything you need to know about TT's Pick @ NO. 27 - DT Kenny Clark Fr. UCLA
Collapse
X
-
I know you're being facetious, but in terms of his build and movement - he does remind me of Justin Harrell.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostLet's not forget Cledius Hunt and Jerel Worthy and Jamal Reynolds.
At least we got one good season out of Hunt...
I'm thinking 1265 should just give up trying to draft DL in the 1st round... they're just not very good at it.wist
Comment
-
Just as I'm sure were having similar conversations about Harrell, Sherrod, Datone, etc.....Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostMcGinn actually goes off what the scouts he has access to say (and his network of scouts probably extends further than any media folks). Bob doesn't do the evaluations himself. Most of the "scouts" you speak of aren't scouts that have an NFL job, and there's a lot of group think.
I think we were having this same converation last year regarding Damarious Randall.
Hope it works out, but it's fair to be skeptical.
Comment
-
I am wishing they'd have traded back, maybe with Denver, and gotten that extra third that Seattle did. They still could've gotten a good defensive lineman at that spot.
But it's all just speculation. We can pronounce all we want, but nobody will really know for a couple years for sure."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
I wish. He's three inches shorter than Harrell. Harrell was a super large man, even if his weight was around 300. Just couldn't get past the injuries.Originally posted by wist43 View PostThe Packer player he most reminds me of is Justin Harrell...."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
I think at least it shows that they didn't have him rated the same as the tackles taken by AZ or Carolina. IF they did, they probably trade back. But trades take two to tango - I assume Denver contacted the Packers, but maybe not.Originally posted by Fritz View PostI am wishing they'd have traded back, maybe with Denver, and gotten that extra third that Seattle did. They still could've gotten a good defensive lineman at that spot.
But it's all just speculation. We can pronounce all we want, but nobody will really know for a couple years for sure.
What would have been funny is if Dallas had traded with GB before they knew the Broncos moved up.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
What Harvey said.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostMcGinn actually goes off what the scouts he has access to say (and his network of scouts probably extends further than any media folks). Bob doesn't do the evaluations himself. Most of the "scouts" you speak of aren't scouts that have an NFL job, and there's a lot of group think.Originally posted by yetisnowman View PostWell those are McGinn's rankings. It's just my opinion. I don't think he's a first round talent. Most scouts had several tackles ranked higher than Clark that were still on the board. Would love to be wrong.Originally posted by Patler View PostI'm not sure how you can call it a reach when McGinn's ranking puts Clark as the #2 DT, behind only Reed and ahead of the likes of Robinson, Rankins, Billings, etc.
I am not a fan of McGinn's own opinion pieces, but I have always respected what he does concerning the draft. It seems that over the years he as managed to gather enough dirt or something on actual team scouts that they are willing to give him rather detailed opinions, and he filters through their conflicting remarks to achieve a combined analysis that has earned him great respect in the media. ESPN and other places refer to his draft pieces quite regularly, and he has won many awards for having the most accurate first round predictions.
As much as I dislike the bulk of McGinn's work, he really shines for a couple weeks before the draft, when he is not using his own analysis but the combined works of an apparently large and quite competent network of individuals who scout the college players for a living.
Comment
-
...The Packers fielded calls from teams looking to acquire their choice. "We didn't ever get into a position where we wanted to pursue that," said Thompson."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Clark is listed at 6' 3" or 6' 2 1/2" depending on where you look, ... you're saying Harrell was 6' 5 1/2"??Originally posted by mraynrand View PostI wish. He's three inches shorter than Harrell. Harrell was a super large man, even if his weight was around 300. Just couldn't get past the injuries.wist
Comment
-
yeah, I think so. At least 6'5" I thought Clark was 6'2"Originally posted by wist43 View PostClark is listed at 6' 3" or 6' 2 1/2" depending on where you look, ... you're saying Harrell was 6' 5 1/2"??
Harrell always looked huge around the other linemen."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
We're desperate for DL help, so Clark will get on the field immediately... he'll be a servicable player, but given that Billings, Robinson, Butler, Dodd, and Ragland were all still there, it's an underwhelming pick.
I liked all of those guys better than Clark.wist
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wist43 View PostHarrell was listed at 6'4, and Clark is listed at 6'3... 3-4=3?? The new math??
I'm glad Clark is 6'3""Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
With his heart issue I can understand why Ragland wasn't taken in the first by anyone.Originally posted by wist43 View PostWe're desperate for DL help, so Clark will get on the field immediately... he'll be a servicable player, but given that Billings, Robinson, Butler, Dodd, and Ragland were all still there, it's an underwhelming pick.
I liked all of those guys better than Clark.
Comment
-
The Packers and NFL both listed Harrell at 6'4...Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
To me, Clark and Harrell look very similar in how they move. Similar body type, neither possessing any special traits. Clark will be a decent player; but, I liked at least 5-6 other guys better.wist
Comment

Comment