Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is the Packers' "Sleeper" Pick?
Collapse
X
-
I like Lowry as a sleeper because teams seemed to have allowed the short arms thing to distract them from the excellent tape the player had produced, including the amazing fact that he got those short arms on the football a total of fourteen times over his career with deflections, batted passes and picks. Not bad for a guy who could have a career in the sideshows as the Alligator Boy.
Like Martinez who went just before him, Lowry may get considerable playing time early in his rookie season and then give the coaches no reason not to give him more. He is a smart and active football player who--in a way--went where he was "supposed" to go because he has the same arm length as guys six inches shorter than he is. But the tape suggests he has the tools to be a highly productive player.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
Not eligible. "Sleepers" are to be last day draft picks, 4th round or later.Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View PostFackrell - with Matthews back on the outside and getting a lot of attention, the guy giving Peppers relief on the other side should have a golden opportunity - if in fact that's where he ends up.
Comment
-
Yeah, I suppose you could draw the line there. 6th or 7th round better yet, as those 3rd and 4th rounders are pretty much expected to be good. My standard, though, would be exceeding expectations. If you want a very low round or UDFA pick who IMO is most likely to make the team, it is Mortell, the punter. Also, a real long shot is a name I was surprised to see on the tryout list that I had a high opinion of in college: Gary Nova of Rutgers - probably just a camp QB, but IMO as likely as Callahan or Williams to be the 3rd/practice squad QB.Originally posted by Patler View PostNot eligible. "Sleepers" are to be last day draft picks, 4th round or later.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
FYI - Its not me drawing the line at 4th round and lower. In the post starting this, I referred to a series being written by NFP, in which they are looking at each teams potential "sleeper", which they defined as a Day 3 pick. They haven't gotten to the NFC North, yet, but I think it will be next for them.Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View PostYeah, I suppose you could draw the line there. 6th or 7th round better yet, as those 3rd and 4th rounders are pretty much expected to be good. My standard, though, would be exceeding expectations. If you want a very low round or UDFA pick who IMO is most likely to make the team, it is Mortell, the punter. Also, a real long shot is a name I was surprised to see on the tryout list that I had a high opinion of in college: Gary Nova of Rutgers - probably just a camp QB, but IMO as likely as Callahan or Williams to be the 3rd/practice squad QB.
Comment
-
I don't know what to think of Masthay's 2015 performance. During the season, it "felt" like he performed poorly. yet at the end of the season he had destroyed the Packers record for net punting average, beating it by a full yard. The record stood for 50 years before Masthay broke it. Kind of hard to bet against that, I think.Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MD View PostPete Mortell. I think he beats out Masthay
Comment
-
For Mortell to beat out Masthay he'll have to prove he's at least as good a holder as Masthay. The Packers will not risk losing a close game or 2 due to bad holds so that they can get a couple extra yards per punt.Originally posted by Patler View PostI don't know what to think of Masthay's 2015 performance. During the season, it "felt" like he performed poorly. yet at the end of the season he had destroyed the Packers record for net punting average, beating it by a full yard. The record stood for 50 years before Masthay broke it. Kind of hard to bet against that, I think.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Masthay is about 20th is yards per punt in his career versus his peers.
The Packers were 12th in Net Punts in 2015. He either got amazing at directionally kicking in one year or the ST punt coverage got a lot better.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Maybe both. He was 4th in punts out of bounds. He was 9th in the number of punts returned (41), but 27th in return yards allowed (174).Originally posted by pbmax View PostMasthay is about 20th is yards per punt in his career versus his peers.
The Packers were 12th in Net Punts in 2015. He either got amazing at directionally kicking in one year or the ST punt coverage got a lot better.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
This is why we have to seriously consider the impact of punting in GB. In a year when Masthay beat the Packers record for net average punt, he finished only 14th in the league. It's not like this was some insignificant record, it stood since the 1960's and no one other than Masthay had come close to beating it. He beat it by a full yard in 2015, yet finished only 14th in the league. If he had simply tied the record instead of demolishing it, he would have been 25th in the league.Originally posted by pbmax View PostMasthay is about 20th is yards per punt in his career versus his peers.
The Packers were 12th in Net Punts in 2015. He either got amazing at directionally kicking in one year or the ST punt coverage got a lot better.
Comment
-
I would describe the problem as a lack of consistency. Every fifth punt or so seemed to be of the "shank you very much" variety.Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostMasthay was the beneficiary of excellent coverage IMO. I don't have the numbers on hand, but his hang time last year was significantly worse than in the past if I remember right. So it't not like he was hitting a bunch of sky high 40 yard punts in which the returner was surrounded."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
I lean in this direction too. It seems like he was asked to punt directionally and it increased the shank average. If Masthay tends to scatter his kicks normally, he might not be an ideal directional kicker.Originally posted by Fritz View PostI would describe the problem as a lack of consistency. Every fifth punt or so seemed to be of the "shank you very much" variety.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment


Comment