Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Queens Get Sam Bradford

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
    Standing pat with Shaun Hill was a defeatist, unacceptable path. If you don't like Bradford, you really have to propose a better risk.
    I'd give Ted a 2 or 3 for Hundley all day long (Ted probably wouldn't do it yet but some young "undiscovered" backup with some mobility who's better than Stave and comes a lot cheaper) before a 1 and 4 for a porcelain statue behind a questionable line.

    Hell I might even detox and quarantine Johnny Football before going all in on Bradford. OK not really, but he'd be cheap, obviously has something to prove and wouldn't cost a young cheap stud who you may be able to build around for years to come. You don't know, but it's not like first round picks don't usually give great value.
    Last edited by vince; 09-03-2016, 11:16 AM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Bad move.

      Comment


      • #33
        A better risk: Offer the Iggles a third for Bradford. Then when he gets hurt in the third game of the season you haven't given up as much.

        Or find a young, up-and-coming-yet-raw rookie or 2nd year QB you can teach, get him for that first rounder, and let him dink and dunk and hand off to AP while he learns on the job.

        Or let Shaun Hill dink-and-dunk and hand off to AP, like you're going to end up doing with Bradford anyway.
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment


        • #34
          Shaun Hill career QB rating: 85.2 - and you get to keep the young cheap stud next year
          Sam Bradford career QB rating: 81.0 - sorry, no young cheap stud next year

          Comment


          • #35
            Risky move. I wonder if the Wilfs pushed the team into this decision, what with a new stadium and tickets to sell. I'm not sure that Bradford is an upgrade over Teddy; but IMO it makes the Vikings the biggest threat to GB in the division.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by run pMc View Post
              Risky move. I wonder if the Wilfs pushed the team into this decision, what with a new stadium and tickets to sell. I'm not sure that Bradford is an upgrade over Teddy; but IMO it makes the Vikings the biggest threat to GB in the division.
              The new stadium will sell the tickets, so it's not that. They feel they are close, and this was an all-in kind of year. Peterson won't be around forever. Once Peterson leaves, the need for an elite QB will increase.
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #37
                If I'm the Vikings. I play Bradford week 1. It prepares him for critical game against Packers. But they probably won't.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by vince View Post
                  Shaun Hill career QB rating: 85.2 - and you get to keep the young cheap stud next year
                  Sam Bradford career QB rating: 81.0 - sorry, no young cheap stud next year
                  That's what I said to your mother last week when she didn't pay me.

                  Sorry, Vince. I just couldn't help myself.
                  "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                  KYPack

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                    That's what I said to your mother last week when she didn't pay me.

                    Sorry, Vince. I just couldn't help myself.
                    So you're done pimping out your kid then?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      OMFG!!!!!!

                      hahahahaha

                      when are teams gonna learn that bradford is a shitty QB. STOP TRADING SHIT FOR HIM!!!!!!

                      sorry ras, that really sucks for you guys

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by run pMc View Post
                        Risky move. I wonder if the Wilfs pushed the team into this decision, what with a new stadium and tickets to sell. I'm not sure that Bradford is an upgrade over Teddy; but IMO it makes the Vikings the biggest threat to GB in the division.
                        sam bradford is not an upgrade over anyone, he's one of the worst QB's in the nfl, not to mention, THE most overpaid

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I don't see them winning the Super Bowl with him, but they might make the playoffs. Their defense is pretty good.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Suddenly I don't feel so bad about John Hadl.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by red View Post
                              sam bradford is not an upgrade over anyone, he's one of the worst QB's in the nfl, not to mention, THE most overpaid
                              I think you are down on Bradford because of his slight metrosexual characteristics. I'm keeping an open mind, he has flashed a lot in spurts, and he's still young and perhaps getting better.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X