Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This is a Different Packers Team

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is a Different Packers Team

    Ha Ha Clinton Dix looked faster, more confident and has always looked strong and good at tackling

    Damarious Randall looked really good. Fast, explosive, confident, aggressive

    Bahktiari looked really, really good. He just stymied his guy play after play

    Lacy is back to looking like Eddie Lacy.

    Taylor/Tretter/Lang looked good. We may have lost something with Sitton, but we gained something with Tretter's improvement. As a whole, I don't think there's much different between last years interior and this years.

    Nick Perry and Datone Jones looked active and disruptive



    I wasn't overly impressed with the WR's. I don't think Rodgers really trusts any of them at this point. The DL is thin. Let's hope we can make it till Pennel comes back. The ILB's are just guys. Joe Thomas is the only one I thought looked active.

    This team does have balance though. Rodgers is very good. Lacy is a damn good runner again. The OL is strong. The defense is strong. The ST's look solid.

    We don't really have old, declining players. Nobody who played well for us last year looks to be declining this year. The Packers do look like an improved team based on growth from within and much happening to cause decline. This looks like a very complete team. We just need a receiving weapon to emerge as a go-to guy for Rodgers and I think the Packers are looking tough to beat.
    Last edited by RashanGary; 09-12-2016, 11:44 AM.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  • #2
    Nick Perry is playing decisively, with confidence. It started last year, and seems to be continuing. Strong son of gun.

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree with the thrust of your opinion JH. There is a lot to like about this team. The defense looked very aggressive and active. I disagree about the ILB's. None of the young guys is a true "thumper," but they were all over the field. Martinez IMO is going to be a good one. Very smart. Good blitzer. Able tackler. Ryan still reminds me of a young AJ Hawk, which isn't all that bad.

      One of the biggest hurdles we have to overcome IMO is still game management. The unforced errors of calling unnecessary TO's and relying on the shaky hurry up offense is disappointing and can't be chalked up to 1st game rust. The troubles have taken up where they left off last year.

      And conservative Stubby still has more confidence in the run game than he should have. It was generally pathetic with a few exceptions. Stubby needs to get more aggressive and rely more on our MVP QB and our revived WR contingent when it comes to Red Zone scoring and making 1st downs at the end of the game.

      What's scary is we escaped with a win which just as easily could have been a loss. And if we had lost the picture we paint today would certainly be less rosy.
      One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
      John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

      Comment


      • #4
        Until Jordy proves he's back, we need a #1 receiver (the x, y, or z--whomever lines up on the line of scrimmage on the outside and consistently outmuscles the opponents on releases). And if he does, he's on the wrong side of 30. So they need an up-and-comer. In all honesty, as much as I'd like it to be eventually Janis, Adams is the only one on the roster besides Jordy to play that outside role.

        Next year, GB gunna need a big WR in the draft.
        No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

        Comment


        • #5
          Need to get Dick and Cook in the game.
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment


          • #6
            Maxie, you mentioned no thumper. Do you think that is the result of them playing so much nickel that they need more cover guys?
            "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

            Comment


            • #7
              Careful, JH, somebody's gonna call you an optimist or a homer or something. Since people usually call me that, I'm gonna do my best to point out the negative side.

              Julius Peppers didn't do crap - Datone was clearly an improvement. Clay either wasn't as active or the Jags just figured him out better in the second half. Quentin Reynolds needs to play outside, not slot corner. I'm not sure Gunter is the solution there either. Burnett made a few good plays but more bad ones. Jared Cook wasn't as good as I expected. The O Line was good because we have been conditioned to not expect much. The new punter was a little bit disappointing. Starks was a big drop off from Lacy.

              I too, of course, want to see a LOT of Janis as a receiver, without the club, maybe even with it. Abbrederis too; Montgomery not so much.
              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View Post
                What's scary is we escaped with a win which just as easily could have been a loss. And if we had lost the picture we paint today would certainly be less rosy.
                You could also say that on the road, in the heat, the team played less than their best and came away with a win.
                Originally posted by 3irty1
                This is museum quality stupidity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Carolina_Packer View Post
                  Maxie, you mentioned no thumper. Do you think that is the result of them playing so much nickel that they need more cover guys?
                  Makes sense. I wasn't saying we need a thumper, I was just saying. I think the best compromise nowadays is a guy like Luke Keukle at Carolina. Cover guy and sure tackler. This may be what we have in Martinez.
                  One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                  John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Zool View Post
                    You could also say that on the road, in the heat, the team played less than their best and came away with a win.
                    I agree with the half-full perspective here because it was a glorified preseason game. A ragged game six weeks in would be worrying. I saw no major breakdowns in any of the position groups. Inside linebackers look like new strength compared to recent years.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I will also say this was a slightly different offense.

                      McCarthy ran some receiver stacks, substituted entire personnel groups and ran a few combo routes to get guys open. Fundamentals or not, he helped his offense much more yesterday than many points last year. Still very little motion though.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by JustinHarrell View Post
                        Ha Ha Clinton Dix looked faster, more confident and has always looked strong and good at tackling

                        Damarious Randall looked really good. Fast, explosive, confident, aggressive

                        Bahktiari looked really, really good. He just stymied his guy play after play

                        Lacy is back to looking like Eddie Lacy.

                        Taylor/Tretter/Lang looked good. We may have lost something with Sitton, but we gained something with Tretter's improvement. As a whole, I don't think there's much different between last years interior and this years.

                        Nick Perry and Datone Jones looked active and disruptive



                        I wasn't overly impressed with the WR's. I don't think Rodgers really trusts any of them at this point. The DL is thin. Let's hope we can make it till Pennel comes back. The ILB's are just guys. Joe Thomas is the only one I thought looked active.

                        This team does have balance though. Rodgers is very good. Lacy is a damn good runner again. The OL is strong. The defense is strong. The ST's look solid.

                        We don't really have old, declining players. Nobody who played well for us last year looks to be declining this year. The Packers do look like an improved team based on growth from within and much happening to cause decline. This looks like a very complete team. We just need a receiving weapon to emerge as a go-to guy for Rodgers and I think the Packers are looking tough to beat.
                        how is eddy looking any better then he did last year

                        he's the same size!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                        he had a few decent runs and one nice one, but he was caught from behind again by 2 guys

                        i don't see the huge difference everyone keeps talking about non stop. "oh the packers said he lost a lot of weight, he must have"

                        and i would say peppers is an old declining player. if you needed cap space, THIS is the guy you should have cut. especially with all the depth we have at OLB

                        edit* peppers only played 29 of of 72 snaps. cm3 (53), perry(52) and datone(40) all had more. not great for a guy counting 10.5 million against our cap this year

                        our secondary had a rough day yesterday, they did not look anywhere near as good as they were suppose to be

                        joe thomas had to good plays, at the start of the game and the end, and did little else the rest of the game

                        and i thought the ILB's looked much better then they have in recent years
                        Last edited by red; 09-12-2016, 06:45 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
                          Until Jordy proves he's back, we need a #1 receiver (the x, y, or z--whomever lines up on the line of scrimmage on the outside and consistently outmuscles the opponents on releases). And if he does, he's on the wrong side of 30. So they need an up-and-comer. In all honesty, as much as I'd like it to be eventually Janis, Adams is the only one on the roster besides Jordy to play that outside role.

                          Next year, GB gunna need a big WR in the draft.
                          unfortuntly, adams seems to be picking up with the same kind of stat line he had last year

                          3 receptions off 7 targets for the game

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                            Need to get Dick and Cook in the game.
                            dickrod with 3 targets, cook with 2

                            thats not gonna cut it

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                              Careful, JH, somebody's gonna call you an optimist or a homer or something. Since people usually call me that, I'm gonna do my best to point out the negative side.

                              Julius Peppers didn't do crap - Datone was clearly an improvement. Clay either wasn't as active or the Jags just figured him out better in the second half. Quentin Reynolds needs to play outside, not slot corner. I'm not sure Gunter is the solution there either. Burnett made a few good plays but more bad ones. Jared Cook wasn't as good as I expected. The O Line was good because we have been conditioned to not expect much. The new punter was a little bit disappointing. Starks was a big drop off from Lacy.

                              I too, of course, want to see a LOT of Janis as a receiver, without the club, maybe even with it. Abbrederis too; Montgomery not so much.
                              rollins

                              he did have a rough game

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X